http://www.debka.com/article/22364/Exclusive-Iran-arrests-3-Fordo-sabotage-suspects-who-entered-from-Azerbaijan
http://oilprice.com/Interviews/Can-Syrias-Rebels-Overthrow-Assad-An-Interview-with-Jellyfish-Operations.html
Bagley: The US has a tendency to temporarily befriend enemy jihadists, let them serve their purposes and then turn against them, creating even more vehement enemies in the process. This is what went horribly wrong in Libya last week. The rebels have already lost control of their Salafi jihadist elements, and along with that, the “hearts and minds” of the citizens who would otherwise have supported them wholeheartedly. Now that support is based on fear as much as it is on love—fear of the extremists. There has already been one rather high-profile assassination of a key jihadist commander, but this is not a realistic solution to the problem. The only way the rebels will defeat the jihadists is to defeat Assad on their own terms.
Alic: On Sunday, Syria’s Foreign Ministry, in a letter to the UN Security Council and Secretary-General Bank Ki-Moon, accused Turkey of allowing al-Qaeda fighters to cross into Syria. According to Syria, their numbers are in the thousands. How would you respond to this?
Bagley: Yes, the strategy is most unfortunate also because it gives Assad ammunition in the UN Security Council. Assad has always accused the rebels of being “terrorists”, even when the conflict first flared up and before “foreign fighters” were allowed to hijack the genuine rebel movement. Now Assad is being legitimized in a way that no one wants to see.
Assad is attempting, successfully, to foment worsening relations among the various sects in Syria to ensure there can be no united rebel force strong enough to affect his defeat. Not only are we dealing with “foreign fighters”, but criminal interests are stepping in to take advantage of the situation, and the population is being divided along sectarian lines, which will only be further exacerbated by the developments that began in Libya last week and quickly spread across the region.
Alic: What do you make of reports of the formation of a new rebel group call the Syrian National Army, apparently supported by Turkey, France and the US?
Bagley: This is more or less the revolution “Take II” and hopefully lighter on the jihadist element. It’s the Western powers trying to right a wrong, to undo the ill-conceived strategy that they started out with. What is disturbing is that this signals that the Free Syrian Army has failed and that there is a need to start over, which will result in a serious loss of momentum, and possibly another conflict front that buys into Assad’s overall plan to weaken the rebels. The “new” rebel group is not in itself a bad development and its commander, defected Major General Muhammad al-Haj Ali purportedly is against international intervention in the form of the establishment of a no-fly zone, and he is correct in this at this point because Assad has blurred the lines too much to make a no-fly zone effective.Alic: Why will this new group be more effective?
Bagley: It may not be. I think what is most important to understand, is that groups like the Free Syrian Army and this new Syrian National Army are by no means the backbone of the revolution. These groups largely are represented by exiled opposition leaders or defected military figures, who are not cohesive. Most of them are in Turkey and Jordan. On the ground, though, there are smaller rebel groups who have managed to establish their own organizational structures and who have been successful in replacing the regime, but not on a national level, only in small areas that are easier to control. It is this momentum upon which we need to build, and it is these smaller groups that the new Syrian National Army should focus on organizing into a national undertaking. If, from exile, the Syrian National Army can coordinate the efforts of these smaller groups instead of attempting to usurp them, they will be successful.
Alic: Assuming the rebels can re-take the revolution, so to speak, from the jihadist elements and overcome their own disunity, what shifts in strategy do they need to adopt in order to gain momentum?
Bagley: The rebels are attempting to change their strategy, demonstrated by the shooting down of a regime helicopter and the targeting of a military base recently. Overall, the rebels need to move away from ad-hoc guerilla warfare and adopt a more conventional military approach, focusing in military targets and hitting at Assad’s capacity to launch air raids that take out civilians in areas where the regime is tracking rebel concentrations. They need to go on the offensive against the regime’s capabilities, not engage in street battles with regime soldiers. For this they need heavy weapons, RPGs and MANPADS, for instance, and a great deal more high-tech equipment than they currently have.
They also need to hit at the sources of the regime’s weapons. They need a much bigger picture strategy in order to protect civilians, which is at the heart of their overall agenda, and they need to be viewed as “protectors” if they are to succeed. For starters, they need to stop shipments of weapons coming in from Iran via Iraq. To do this, they need intelligence.
Alic: And who is going to arm the rebels?
Bagley: That would be the million-dollar question. The US will not intervene directly ahead of presidential elections. Europe cannot intervene. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are more interested in Salafi jihadists getting the upper hand over the “original rebels”. The US is openly calling essentially for private donations to enable the rebels to buy weapons. In the end, they will be armed by the private sector, but so far the money is not there. It’s possible that donors are waiting to see what kind of strategy the rebels can come up with. But Iran may unwittingly force the hand of the “donors” to move more quickly. Alic: On Sunday, the commander-in-chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps made a public statement to the effect that Iran is assisting Syria militarily and may become directly involved if they feel the regime is truly threatened by external forces.
Bagley: Yes, this was interesting as it was the first time Iran has publicly admitted its assistance to Syria. However, there are also some internal Iranian politics to consider here; specifically that this statement came from the Revolutionary Guards and not from Tehran.
There seems to be a difference of opinion among Iranian power-brokers as to how to handle the situation in Syria. The Revolutionary Guards would like to play a more active role in the conflict, while the Iranian Supreme Leader is playing things more cautiously. What is significant here is that the Guards report directly to the Supreme Leader, and for the first time the Guards seem to be overstepping their bounds.
Alic: Thank you for taking the time to speak with us Michael. To find out more about Jellyfish Operations and how they can help your company with intelligence gathering, discovering new opportunities and mitigating operational risk – please visit their website: http://www.jellyfishoperations.com
Exclusive: Iran arrests 3 Fordo sabotage suspects who entered from Azerbaijan
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report September 18, 2012, 9:27 PM (GMT+02:00)
Reconstruction of explosion that cut Fordo power lines
Iran is holding three suspects who entered the country from Azerbaijan under intense grilling to discover their role in the mid-August explosion of the power lines to the underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo, DEBKAfile’s exclusive Iranian sources reveal. Tehran is also questioning the engineers, planners and company heads who built the facility to find out why it was not provided with an independent power generator.
Fordo was forced to be idle for several days until the Revolutionary Guards were able to set up an alternative electrical network at top speed. Iranian investigators suspect that local builders of Fordo may have been bribed by Israeli and American agents to omit this back-up system and so leave the enrichment plant vulnerable to external attack that would interrupt its continuous operation. Their inquiries have even reached the Atomic Energy Commission inspectors who supervised construction, some of them very close to the commission’s chairman Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani, and demanded explanations for letting the omission stand.
The act of sabotage showed Iran how simple it would for aggressors to bring the Fordo plant to a total standstill simply by cutting its 40- kilometer power link to the Qom power station. An electricity cut would additionally disarm the facility’s security system, including the radar and air defense batteries guarding it.
According to DEBKAfile’s sources, the Iranians have kept the three arrests under tight blackout in the hope of rounding up the rest of the team suspected of responsibility for the explosion and, above all, identifying the hand behind it. Their main suspect is Israel.
Fordo was forced to be idle for several days until the Revolutionary Guards were able to set up an alternative electrical network at top speed. Iranian investigators suspect that local builders of Fordo may have been bribed by Israeli and American agents to omit this back-up system and so leave the enrichment plant vulnerable to external attack that would interrupt its continuous operation. Their inquiries have even reached the Atomic Energy Commission inspectors who supervised construction, some of them very close to the commission’s chairman Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani, and demanded explanations for letting the omission stand.
The act of sabotage showed Iran how simple it would for aggressors to bring the Fordo plant to a total standstill simply by cutting its 40- kilometer power link to the Qom power station. An electricity cut would additionally disarm the facility’s security system, including the radar and air defense batteries guarding it.
According to DEBKAfile’s sources, the Iranians have kept the three arrests under tight blackout in the hope of rounding up the rest of the team suspected of responsibility for the explosion and, above all, identifying the hand behind it. Their main suspect is Israel.
Our Iranian sources have discovered that the three detainees hail from Tehran, Tabriz in the north and Zahedan in the southeast. They are all in their twenties. According to our intelligence sources, the Iranian inquiry so far points to their having trained at a secret military base in Azerbaijan 25 kilometers south of Baku and infiltrated Iran shortly before the operation.
It was to this attack Abbasi referred Monday, Sept. 17, when he stood up at the nuclear watchdog’s annual meeting in Vienna and flatly accused the IAEA of being infiltrated by“terrorists and saboteurs” and of foreknowledge of the explosion.
It was to this attack Abbasi referred Monday, Sept. 17, when he stood up at the nuclear watchdog’s annual meeting in Vienna and flatly accused the IAEA of being infiltrated by“terrorists and saboteurs” and of foreknowledge of the explosion.
Already, Iranian officials have turned the incident into a propaganda tool.
Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi used his first ever Egyptian television interview Tuesday, Sept. 18 to comment: “Israel can’t carry out an attack against such a big country [like Iran], and it knows that.” He called Israeli warnings about a possible strike “empty.”
Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi used his first ever Egyptian television interview Tuesday, Sept. 18 to comment: “Israel can’t carry out an attack against such a big country [like Iran], and it knows that.” He called Israeli warnings about a possible strike “empty.”
Salehi also said (apropos of nothing) that his “country’s neighbor, Azerbaijan, would not assist Israel in carrying out any attack on Iran.”
DEBKAfile: The Iranian foreign minister’s show of contempt for Israel was meant to dull the huge impact the explosion at the Fordo plant has had inside Iran and across the Arab world, whereas his remark on Azerbaijan was a signal to Baku that it is under heavy Iranian suspicion of complicity in the blowing up of the power line.
DEBKAfile: The Iranian foreign minister’s show of contempt for Israel was meant to dull the huge impact the explosion at the Fordo plant has had inside Iran and across the Arab world, whereas his remark on Azerbaijan was a signal to Baku that it is under heavy Iranian suspicion of complicity in the blowing up of the power line.
and an interesting theory - was Harry the target after all......
http://www.infowars.com/cia-sponsored-taliban-attack-camp-bastion-with-orders-to-kidnap-or-kill-prince-harry/
CIA-Sponsored Taliban Attack Camp Bastion With Orders to Kidnap or Kill Prince Harry
Susanne Posel
Infowars.com
September 18, 2012
Infowars.com
September 18, 2012
An attack on Camp Bastion that led to the deaths of two US Marines is being reported as a botched “attempt to kidnap Prince Harry during his four-month tour of duty.”
Prince Harry, an Army captain, was stationed at the compound at Camp Bastion for his second tour of duty.
The plan called “Harry Operations” was carried out by the CIA-creation, the Taliban, who sent insurgents onto the military base in Afghanistan. A Taliban spokesperson confirmed that they “attacked that base because Prince Harry was also on it and so they can know our anger.” He asserted that “thousands more suicide attackers are ready to give up their lives.”
British propaganda media explain that Prince Harry had his pistol in hand and was ready to fight when he was “whisked to safety by SAS bodyguards as the Taliban launched its deadly attack on Camp Bastion.”
An anonymous insider at the base said that “if anything happened to [Prince Harry] it would have been disastrous.”
The Taliban was successful in destroying 3 refueling stations, 6 American Harrier jets and 6 aircraft hangers before being stopped. They dressed in clothing indicative of the locals’ which fooled check point security. The Taliban insurgents then gathered weapons and uniforms to infiltrate the base with AKA47 rifles and rocket-propelled grenades.
Sources in the British Ministry of Defense explained that the anti-Islamic film produced by the US government and released by FBI informant Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a.k.a. Sam Bacile, was the cause of the riot at the base that sparked the attack.
Mainstream media is reporting that the FBI informant Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a.k.a. Sam Bacile, has been taken for questioning. After Nakoula was imprisoned in 2009 for banking fraud, he was employed as an informant for the FBI just before he was used as a patsy in the making of the film Innocence of Muslims that the US government is claiming they had no hand in producing. In order to cover their tracks, and facilitate the psy-op that convinces the American public that Islam and al-Qaeda are legitimate terrorists, the FBI is holding Nakoula for questioning.
At first, the Zionist-controlled Israeli government tried to assert that Nakoula was not an Israeli citizen and according to their intelligence, there was no record of Nakoula being in California.
Now the story has changed and Nakoula is a real person who can be used as a patsy to be condemned by the US government to justify their “official” version of what is happening. As they create a fake revolution in the Islamic world with the aid of their fake terrorist group al-Qaeda, Nakoula is playing his part in the theater of lies.
According to Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, the Taliban is a “construct of the CIA and was armed by the CIA.” Rohrabacher said that the CIA-created Taliban served the US interests against the Russians in Afghanistan and have continued to be used even up-and-to the current presidential administration.
Roharbacher spoke during a House Committee on Foreign Affairs meeting where he named Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State was part of the ruse that is the Taliban. Clinton’s husband, during his presidency formed the Taliban with the assistance of the Saudi Arabian government and Pakistan.
Selig Harrison, speaking at the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars held a presentation entitled “Terrorism and Regional Security: Managing the Challenges in Asia.” Harrison said that the “CIA made a historic mistake in encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan.”
In creating the fake Islamic extremist groups and insurgents to be used for the proxy wars the US government wanted to fight subversively, $3 billion was invested into fake revolutionaries like the Taliban.
As the CIA funded and trained the Taliban for false flag operations wherein they would be used to attack key locations and cause havoc in pre-determined regions around the world, the ideology and perception of Islam as a radical religion began to take root.
Mainstream media reports that the Taliban and al-Qaeda are “infiltrated” by the CIA for understanding of the terrorist networks. However, intelligence gathering in their own faction simply enhances their success. The CIA, from sources within the federal agency, say that al-Qaeda is equipped with chemical, nuclear and biological weapons provided to them by the CIA.
In 2009, the Obama administration was working with the CIA-controlled Taliban to carry out attacks on targets for the US government. With the use of drones and air support to aid the Taliban in driving back the Pakistani forces during the early part of 2009, Obama followed in the footsteps of the other globalist puppets before him – using a fake terrorist organization with the intention of using terrorism against strategic nations without being obvious.
In August, Prince Harry was exposed, literally, when nude pictures of him participating in an orgy in Las Vegas circulated on the internet. Palace officials tried to downplay the embarrassment by saying that “Prince Harry has been on a private holiday before he resumes his military duties.
This latest incident is not the first time Prince Harry has been caught in a compromising position. In 2002, he was accused of under-age drinking and smoking pot. Prince Harry was 16 years old at the time of the allegation. In response, Prince Charles took Prince Harry to a rehabilitation center for drug abuse.
Prince Harry was photographed in 2005 wearing a Nazi soldier uniform at a party which made the cover of British tabloid newspapers.
Why would the US government use one of their fake terrorist factions to attack a base in Afghanistan and specifically target Prince Harry who is stationed there? Are there plans for a false flag involving Prince Harry and a CIA-controlled Islamic extremist group to further the global Elite’s forward march toward WW III?
and back to Syria and those chemical weapons - false flag desperation ......
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/syria-tested-chemical-weapons-in-desert-in-august-eyewitnesses-say-a-856206.html
09/17/2012
Shells in the DesertSyria Tested Chemical Weapons Systems, Witnesses Say
The Syrian army is believed to have tested missile systems for poison gas shells at the end of August, statements from various witnesses indicate.
The tests took place near a chemical weapons research center at Safira east of Aleppo, witnesses told SPIEGEL. A total of five or six empty shells devised for delivering chemical agents were fired by tanks and aircraft, at a site called Diraiham in the desert near the village of Khanasir.
Iranian officers believed to be members of the Revolutionary Guards were flown in by helicopter for the testing, according to the statements.
The Safira research center is regarded as Syria's largest testing site for chemical weapons. It is officially referred to as a "scientific research center."
Hoping for US Troops
Scientists from Iran and North Korea are said to work in the expansive, fenced-off complex. According to Western intelligence agencies, they produce chemical agents such as sarin, tabun and mustard gas and test them on animals.
In recent months, the guards have been replaced and reinforced by more than 100 elite troops from the 4th Tank Division. In addition, power generators and large supplies of diesel have recently been brought to the plant to safeguard the supply of electricity in the event of an attack by rebels, reports say.
But the rebels don't plan to take the site. "We hope American troops will secure the plant," said one former army officer who deserted and joined the Free Syrian Army. "We don't want the regime to be able to use the weapons, but neither do we want them to fall into the hands of radicals after the downfall (of the regime)."
Syria is believed to have one of the world's largest arsenals of chemical weapons.
analysis on Syria and not from Stratfor.....
Can Syria's Rebels Overthrow Assad? An Interview with Jellyfish Operations
As rebels attempt to regroup in advance of a new strategy to overpower Assad, and Western powers try to start from scratch with a new rebel formation that is presumably devoid of Salafi Jihadists, the US is calling on third party, non-state actors to arm the rebels in order to avoid becoming embroiled in a geopolitically sensitive conflict just ahead of presidential elections. As attentions turn to the chaos breaking out across the Middle East and North Africa (and even further afield), what chance do the rebels have of pushing Assad to his limits? Michael Bagley, President of the Jellyfish Operationsprivate intelligence boutique, which has adopted an approach that is contrary to the typical “yes-man” characteristics of its competitors, calls a spade a spade.
In the interview, Michael discusses:
• Can the rebels defeat Assad
• What strategy the rebels need to adopt to be successful
• Why Al-Qaeda’s growing presence benefits Assad
• Why Assad’s strategy to weaken the rebels is working
• Who is going to arm the rebels
• Why the U.S & Europe can’t intervene
• Why the U.S. can’t make the same mistakes they made in Libya
• How to rid the rebels of extremist forces
In the interview, Michael discusses:
• Can the rebels defeat Assad
• What strategy the rebels need to adopt to be successful
• Why Al-Qaeda’s growing presence benefits Assad
• Why Assad’s strategy to weaken the rebels is working
• Who is going to arm the rebels
• Why the U.S & Europe can’t intervene
• Why the U.S. can’t make the same mistakes they made in Libya
• How to rid the rebels of extremist forces
Jen Alic: Let’s just start out with the biggest question on everyone’s mind. Can the rebels defeat Assad?
Michael Bagley: Certainly, they can, but to fully answer this question we have to look backwards and forwards. It was a grave mistake for the US and its Arab allies to purposefully facilitate an influx of foreign fighters, namely Salafi jihadists, into Syria through the Turkish border to boost the ranks of the Syrian rebels. Now the rebels are in a tough position, and clearly everyone is having second thoughts about this disastrous strategy, not least the true rebels themselves. This temporary solution to the rebels’ inadequate manpower is now a not-so-temporary setback. This is the first problem that must be resolved.Alic: The next obvious question, then, is how does one get rid of extremist forces it has welcomed into its ranks?
Michael Bagley: Certainly, they can, but to fully answer this question we have to look backwards and forwards. It was a grave mistake for the US and its Arab allies to purposefully facilitate an influx of foreign fighters, namely Salafi jihadists, into Syria through the Turkish border to boost the ranks of the Syrian rebels. Now the rebels are in a tough position, and clearly everyone is having second thoughts about this disastrous strategy, not least the true rebels themselves. This temporary solution to the rebels’ inadequate manpower is now a not-so-temporary setback. This is the first problem that must be resolved.Alic: The next obvious question, then, is how does one get rid of extremist forces it has welcomed into its ranks?
Bagley: The US has a tendency to temporarily befriend enemy jihadists, let them serve their purposes and then turn against them, creating even more vehement enemies in the process. This is what went horribly wrong in Libya last week. The rebels have already lost control of their Salafi jihadist elements, and along with that, the “hearts and minds” of the citizens who would otherwise have supported them wholeheartedly. Now that support is based on fear as much as it is on love—fear of the extremists. There has already been one rather high-profile assassination of a key jihadist commander, but this is not a realistic solution to the problem. The only way the rebels will defeat the jihadists is to defeat Assad on their own terms.
Alic: On Sunday, Syria’s Foreign Ministry, in a letter to the UN Security Council and Secretary-General Bank Ki-Moon, accused Turkey of allowing al-Qaeda fighters to cross into Syria. According to Syria, their numbers are in the thousands. How would you respond to this?
Bagley: Yes, the strategy is most unfortunate also because it gives Assad ammunition in the UN Security Council. Assad has always accused the rebels of being “terrorists”, even when the conflict first flared up and before “foreign fighters” were allowed to hijack the genuine rebel movement. Now Assad is being legitimized in a way that no one wants to see.
Assad is attempting, successfully, to foment worsening relations among the various sects in Syria to ensure there can be no united rebel force strong enough to affect his defeat. Not only are we dealing with “foreign fighters”, but criminal interests are stepping in to take advantage of the situation, and the population is being divided along sectarian lines, which will only be further exacerbated by the developments that began in Libya last week and quickly spread across the region.
Alic: What do you make of reports of the formation of a new rebel group call the Syrian National Army, apparently supported by Turkey, France and the US?
Bagley: This is more or less the revolution “Take II” and hopefully lighter on the jihadist element. It’s the Western powers trying to right a wrong, to undo the ill-conceived strategy that they started out with. What is disturbing is that this signals that the Free Syrian Army has failed and that there is a need to start over, which will result in a serious loss of momentum, and possibly another conflict front that buys into Assad’s overall plan to weaken the rebels. The “new” rebel group is not in itself a bad development and its commander, defected Major General Muhammad al-Haj Ali purportedly is against international intervention in the form of the establishment of a no-fly zone, and he is correct in this at this point because Assad has blurred the lines too much to make a no-fly zone effective.Alic: Why will this new group be more effective?
Bagley: It may not be. I think what is most important to understand, is that groups like the Free Syrian Army and this new Syrian National Army are by no means the backbone of the revolution. These groups largely are represented by exiled opposition leaders or defected military figures, who are not cohesive. Most of them are in Turkey and Jordan. On the ground, though, there are smaller rebel groups who have managed to establish their own organizational structures and who have been successful in replacing the regime, but not on a national level, only in small areas that are easier to control. It is this momentum upon which we need to build, and it is these smaller groups that the new Syrian National Army should focus on organizing into a national undertaking. If, from exile, the Syrian National Army can coordinate the efforts of these smaller groups instead of attempting to usurp them, they will be successful.
Alic: Assuming the rebels can re-take the revolution, so to speak, from the jihadist elements and overcome their own disunity, what shifts in strategy do they need to adopt in order to gain momentum?
Bagley: The rebels are attempting to change their strategy, demonstrated by the shooting down of a regime helicopter and the targeting of a military base recently. Overall, the rebels need to move away from ad-hoc guerilla warfare and adopt a more conventional military approach, focusing in military targets and hitting at Assad’s capacity to launch air raids that take out civilians in areas where the regime is tracking rebel concentrations. They need to go on the offensive against the regime’s capabilities, not engage in street battles with regime soldiers. For this they need heavy weapons, RPGs and MANPADS, for instance, and a great deal more high-tech equipment than they currently have.
They also need to hit at the sources of the regime’s weapons. They need a much bigger picture strategy in order to protect civilians, which is at the heart of their overall agenda, and they need to be viewed as “protectors” if they are to succeed. For starters, they need to stop shipments of weapons coming in from Iran via Iraq. To do this, they need intelligence.
Alic: And who is going to arm the rebels?
Bagley: That would be the million-dollar question. The US will not intervene directly ahead of presidential elections. Europe cannot intervene. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are more interested in Salafi jihadists getting the upper hand over the “original rebels”. The US is openly calling essentially for private donations to enable the rebels to buy weapons. In the end, they will be armed by the private sector, but so far the money is not there. It’s possible that donors are waiting to see what kind of strategy the rebels can come up with. But Iran may unwittingly force the hand of the “donors” to move more quickly. Alic: On Sunday, the commander-in-chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps made a public statement to the effect that Iran is assisting Syria militarily and may become directly involved if they feel the regime is truly threatened by external forces.
Bagley: Yes, this was interesting as it was the first time Iran has publicly admitted its assistance to Syria. However, there are also some internal Iranian politics to consider here; specifically that this statement came from the Revolutionary Guards and not from Tehran.
There seems to be a difference of opinion among Iranian power-brokers as to how to handle the situation in Syria. The Revolutionary Guards would like to play a more active role in the conflict, while the Iranian Supreme Leader is playing things more cautiously. What is significant here is that the Guards report directly to the Supreme Leader, and for the first time the Guards seem to be overstepping their bounds.
Alic: Thank you for taking the time to speak with us Michael. To find out more about Jellyfish Operations and how they can help your company with intelligence gathering, discovering new opportunities and mitigating operational risk – please visit their website: http://www.jellyfishoperations.com
No comments:
Post a Comment