Info wars....
Ron Paul: The Ukraine Fuse Has Been Lit
Daniel McAdams
lewrockwell.com
lewrockwell.com
Ron Paul and Charles Goyette discuss the ongoing crisis in Ukraine, including a new Senate bill that seeks to push the US to the very brink of war with Russia. In addition to ramping up NATO’s military presence on Russia’s borders, the bill will appropriate $10 billion to push regime change in Russia!
In this podcast, Ron Paul chides supporters of the Senate bill, saying: “many of the warmongers in the Senate who sign on to this bill are so-called conservatives, but I’ve never understand how those who call themselves conservative can be so liberal with other people’s money when it comes to war overseas. They may vote against food for the poor and say ‘well I am a real hero and a Constitutionalist,’ but at the same time they never challenge the military industrial complex and the wars overseas.”
Listen to the podcast here.
Itar Tass....
Next “roundtable for national unity” may be held in Cherkassy May 21
May 17, 19:25 UTC+4
On May 14, the first roundtable in the Verkhovna Rada discussed settlement in the troubled Donbass, constitutional reform, decentralisation of power and fight against corruption
On May 14, the first roundtable in the Verkhovna Rada discussed settlement in the troubled Donbass, constitutional reform, decentralisation of power and fight against corruption
KIEV, May 17, 18:49 /ITAR-TASS/. Ukraine’s former president Leonid Kravchuk has said the third “roundtable for national unity” over the settlement in the south-east of Ukraine may take place in Cherkassy, central Ukraine, on Wednesday, May 21.
Kravchuk spoke upon completion of the “second roundtable for national unity”, held in the eastern city of Kharkov on Saturday amid continuing armed operation in the country’s east.
Discussions in Kharkov were more open than in Kiev. “We’re trying to improve our work. This ‘roundtable’ was opener and included more issues. It involved representatives of the opposition and regions, including of the Lugansk region,” Kravchuk said.
Lots of high-profile politicians and officials participated in the discussions, in particular Ukraine’s former presidents Leonid Kravchuk and Leonid Kuchma, parliament-appointed interim Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk, Minister for Regional Construction and Housing Vladimir Groisman and Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, Acting Foreign Minister Andrei Deshchitsa, Vice-Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s national parliament, Ruslan Koshulinsky, lawmakers and representatives of local self-rule bodies, religious and public organisations.
On May 14, the first roundtable in the Verkhovna Rada discussed settlement in the troubled Donbass, constitutional reform, decentralisation of power, and fight against corruption among other issues.
Certain politicians claimed that the dialogue failed then as the participants again turned a deaf ear to the east of the country. A lawmaker of the Party of Regions, Nestor Shufrich, said that those who were openly opposing the authorities in the east should have been invited. The Ukrainian communists were not there, either, he said.
“Without their participation - immediate or tentative - all the roundtable debates are declarative,” he said adding “there is no place at the table for those whose hands are in blood.”
The authorities are tasked with decentralisation and transfer of power to the regions and a status of the Russia language, he said. Shufrich is confident that “the parliament must find the stamina and settle the issue once and for all.
Russia insists on immediate ending of combat actions in southeastern Ukraine
May 17, 14:59 UTC+4
Moscow hopes that the West will exert energetic impact on the Kiev authorities to ensure the start of practical efforts
Moscow hopes that the West will exert energetic impact on the Kiev authorities to ensure the start of practical efforts
May 17, 14:59 UTC+4
Moscow hopes that the West will exert energetic impact on the Kiev authorities to ensure the start of practical efforts
Moscow hopes that the West will exert energetic impact on the Kiev authorities to ensure the start of practical efforts
MOSCOW, May 17, 14:05 /ITAR-TASS/. Russia insists on an immediate ending of Kiev-led combat actions in southeastern Ukraine, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement Saturday.
Moscow hopes that the West will exert energetic impact on the Kiev authorities to ensure the start of practical efforts towards the settling of the situation in the southeastern regions of the country.
Continuation of the punitive operation in the area of Slavyansk testifies to the hypocrisy of the government in Kiev, which is make deceitful claims about its readiness to act in line with provisions of the statement by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) regarding its roadmap.
Russia has grave doubts that an election held to the accompaniment of cannonades matches the democratic norms of the electoral process, which is underway in Ukraine, the ministry said.
RIA Novosti.......
Russian Diplomat Says OSCE Report on Ukraine Ignores Govt's Violation of Human Rights
Russian Diplomat Says OSCE Report on Ukraine Ignores Govt's Violation of Human Rights
© Photo OSCE/Mikhail Evstafiev
18:59 16/05/2014
MOSCOW, May 16 (RIA Novosti) – An OSCE report on Ukraine ignores the Kiev government’s violations of human rights, as well as the rise of neo-nationalist and xenophobic sentiments in the society, a senior Russian diplomat said.
“[The report] ignores facts of blatant violations of basic human rights – such as the right to express opinions freely – by the de-facto authorities in Kiev with support from the West. It also lacks information about the rise of neo-Nazi, xenophobic, ultranationalist and anti-Semitic sentiments in Ukraine,” Konstantin Dolgov, Russian Foreign Ministry's Special Representative for Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, said in his Twitter blog.
He also said the report fails to mention “the destructive role of Maidan activists,” whose violent actions against law enforcement officers, including the use of firearms against them, have resulted in a state coup that brought neo-Nazis and ultranationalists to power.
“The OSCE also showed little interest in the punitive operation against residents of the southeast [who question the legitimacy of the interim Kiev government],” Dolgov said.
“Instead, the authors point at alleged violations of human rights in Russia’s Republic of Crimea and in southeastern regions of Ukraine, offering no proof. We call on the OSCE leadership and its special mission in Ukraine to give a full and comprehensive assessment of the disastrous human rights situation in the country,” the diplomat said.
A state coup took place in Ukraine of February 22, when erstwhile opposition, supported by violent protests in the streets of the capital Kiev, seized power, ousted President Viktor Yanukovych and appointed elections for May 25. Moscow says doubts the legitimacy of the incumbent government and says its legitimacy will depend on the transparency of the political process in Ukraine and the respect for interests of regions.
The coup-imposed government launched a military operation in Ukraine’s eastern and southeastern regions on April 15 with an aim to crush dissent among residents who refuse to recognize the legitimacy of central and regional authorities. Protesters want broader autonomy for their regions and demand to treat the linguistic and cultural peculiarities of their regions with respect.
Russia Today.....
Kiev proclaims post-referendum Donetsk, Lugansk regions ‘terrorist organizations’
New authorities in post-coup Kiev have listed the self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Lugansk as terrorist organizations. The two regions proclaimed themselves sovereign states after the controversial May 11 referendums.
“The two so-called 'people’s republics' in Donetsk and Lugansk regions are terrorist organizations, which have a clear hierarchy, financing, and channels of weapons supplies,” Ukraine’s deputy prosecutor general, Nikolay Golomsha, said.
The statement confirmed a similar statement made by Ukraine's minister of justice, Pavel Petrenko. The minister said the two “were created for assaulting people, intimidation, sabotage, terrorist attacks, beatings, and murder of our citizens.”
Criminal cases have been launched to investigate the “formation of the terrorist organizations.”
On Friday, Golomsha stressed that the General Prosecutor's Office has managed to reveal channels through which weapons are being supplied to Donetsk and Lugansk.
On May 11, the Ukrainian regions held referendums and voted for self-rule. Kiev and Western countries condemned the ballots, calling them illegal.
Kiev has intensified its military crackdown in the region, deploying tanks, APCs and helicopters. It formed paramilitary forces which are now on the ground in Donetsk and Lugansk regions as part of an “anti-military operation.”
The self-proclaimed republics are demanding the withdrawal of Kiev fighters which continue to clash with local self-defense units.
The deadline for an ultimatum issued by the Donetsk People's Republic, which demanded that Kiev pull out its troops, passed on Friday.
A deputy commander of the pro-autonomy militia of Donbass, Sergey Zdrilyuk, said on May 15 that all Ukrainian armed forces had 24 hours to withdraw their armored vehicles and checkpoints from around “Donetsk, Mariupol, and other cities.”
He threatened to “destroy and burn down all of this” if the demand was not met. However, Kiev's forces still remain in the region. According to the Donetsk People's Republic, the troops were enlarged following the ultimatum.
Reuters....
Energy sanctions against Russia would be 'inappropriate', EU says
ATHENS
(Reuters) - European Energy Commissioner Guenther Oettinger said on Friday that Russia is Europe's main trading partner in natural gas and that there should be therefore no sanctions against Moscow's energy sector over the crisis in Ukraine.
Sanctions against the Russian energy sector are "something that is inappropriate," Oettinger told reporters through an interpreter after a meeting of EU energy ministers in Athens.
Anti - War ...
Russia to Ukraine: We’ll Talk Gas Discount If You Pay Off Debt
Energy Minister: Pay Everything Through April 1
by Jason Ditz, May 16, 2014
Ukraine’s interim government may have lost the long-standing natural gas discount they were getting from Russia in the past, but negotiations for a new one are possible, according to Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak.
According to Novak, the Russian government is willing to discuss a new price discount provided Ukraine actually starts making good on its payments for gas delivered under the old discount program, through April 1.
That’s $2.237 billion in back payments, just to get them current through the first of April, and reflects how long it’s actually been since Ukraine was paying for its gas, no matter what price was being charged on paper.
Russian officials announced yesterday that Gazprom, the world’s largest natural gas company, will insist on up-front payment before any future deliveries to Ukraine. Though this makes sense on the surface, the situation is more complicated than that.
That’s because a lot of Russia’s paying customers are in central Europe, and that gas goes through the pipeline into Ukraine. Cutting off gas to Ukraine risks them trying to syphon off those supplies, or making shipments to Europe completely impossible. It’s the desire to protect those markets that has Russia interested in cutting a deal with Ukraine, though with the interim government so far unwilling to pay its bills a deal may be hard to broker.
Sydney Morning Herald....
Ukraine crisis: A city in shock, but who is in control of Mariupol?
Attacked: Men inspect the ruins of the central police station in Mariupol. Photo: Kate Geraghty
Mariupol: This is a city in dazed shock. We drive in gingerly, not sure about who, if anyone, is in control of a sprawling industrial centre that erupted in anger when Ukrainian national military forces turned their guns on the main police station last week.
We walk up Metalurhiv Avenue, named in honour of the local steel workers, to where it intersects with Ilyich Avenue, celebrating the Russian revolutionary leader Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.
Tracked military machines have gouged the bitumen where these two roads intersect. A teenage boy, masked and wielding a police riot shield and a club, sits on an abandoned armoured personnel carrier. There's a tangle of fire hoses and, off to one side, a woman nurses a plastic crate filled with petrol bombs. The intersection is barricaded with an assortment of tyres and upended industrial-size wheelie bins.
Sifting through debris: A man in a burnt-out bank in Mariupol. Photo: Kate Geraghty
"Where is the police chief?" we ask the woman. "He killed himself," she answers vacantly. In the darkened shell of a burnt-out bank, a man scavenging in the debris unearths a silver coin from the ashes. "I'm an archaeologist," he insists, as though scavenging is beneath him.
Advertisement
We fall in with a 67-year-old woman who wields a bunch of red roses. She refuses to identify herself, but she says: "Come, I'm going to the police station."
She is not alone. Dozens arrive, adding to a small mountain of flowers on the steps to what is left of the police station after an assault in which the Kiev government claims to have killed at "least 20 terrorists". But, after a tour of local hospitals, Human Rights Watch researcher Anna Neistat concludes that "at least seven" were killed – only one of whom was of the security forces – and more than 40 injured, six of whom were of the security forces.
Charred remains: Two burnt police helmets among flowers left at the entrance of the police station in Mariupol. Photo: Kate Geraghty
Instructions to the city's medics not to release any information incite wild unsubstantiated claims that many more were killed and their bodies spirited away from the town. The woman with the roses is adamant: "They killed 300 as if we were insects; they dropped bombs from aircraft."
A man in the crowd explains to a small audience that hundreds of locals are being "disappeared" – taken to Kiev where they are killed before their bodies are harvested of organs for sale on the European black market. Really?
Pointing to where big chunks of the police station's walls are missing and disembowelled airconditioning units hang precariously, another man demands: "And they want us to believe that Molotov cocktails did that?"
At a military checkpoint: Lieutenant Igor Dumbrovsky in Mariupol. Photo: Kate Geraghty
Where do we find whoever is in charge? He directs us to the town's administrative centre, control of which has changed several times during the crisis. Now it is gutted and the rank and file of the separatist movement conduct their business in the forecourt – here a dispensary table, laden with a range of drugs; there the galley tables, stocked with food; and over there the treasury, where locals queue to make cash donations.
Men are sleeping soundly on couches salvaged from the building while five grandmothers perch on steel-framed chairs watching the passing parade – couples posing for family snaps in from the abandoned APC; a crowd of about 100 waiting patiently in what appears to be an orderly run on the institution. They are allowed to enter another bank one at a time.
Can we speak to whoever is in charge? "We're all in charge – this is a collective," a man says as smoke rises from tyres that are still burning on a barricade.
Can we speak to whoever is in charge? "We're all in charge – this is a collective," a man says as smoke rises from tyres that are still burning on a barricade.
In the street, we spy three policemen and ask who is their new boss.
Pro-Russian: A rebel in front of the Mariupol council building. Photo: Kate Geraghty
"We don’t know," one replies sheepishly.
Later, we are informed that indeed there is an acting police chief. Can we talk to him? "No."
His name is Oleg Margon and his men are still in Mariupol, but they are hunkering behind sandbags and bolted doors at a police station in the suburbs.
Click for more photos
Eastern Ukraine
Ukrainian national army Lt Igor Dombrovsky at a Ukrainian military checkpoint on the northern perimeter of the city of Mariupol in Eastern Ukraine. Photo: Kate Geraghty
When two young shopkeepers, Ivan Kurilov and Vitali Lukin, show up there to complain that 21 shops on their street have been looted, they are told through a crack in the door: "Come back later, we're too busy."
Through the same crack, we ask for information on the fate of the former police chief who, reportedly, is dead. "His name was Valeriy Andrushko – we have no information about him," we are told.
A helpful local journalist explains that all phone calls to the police in Mariupol are being re-routed to the police at Donetsk, the regional centre, about 110 kilometres to the north.
There is a small military base in the city but, when we attend there, it has been abandoned and looted.
So who is keeping the peace in Mariupol? We are told that the owner of one of the local steel plants, who happens to be the country's richest man, has ordered his tradesmen and labourers into the streets to quiet things down.
We still could not be sure who was in control. But, driving away, we chanced upon Lieutenant Igor Dumbrovsky, of the Ukrainian National Army, during a tense moment at a checkpoint on the city's northern limit.
As we pulled up, about half a dozen men in the uniform of the special operations wing of the Ukrainian National Guard had their guns drawn, yelling at a truck driver whose slow response to their instruction to alight from his vehicle had aroused their suspicion.
Pulling us into the cover of a clump of roadside trees, Lieutenant Dumbrovsky cradled his weapon as he, refreshingly, gave a candid account of security in Mariupol. It went like this:
Question: Who controls Mariupol?
Till yesterday evening, the police had lost control.
Till yesterday evening, the police had lost control.
What about the National Guard?
They were there, but they've left the town. They retreated to a military base next to the airport.
They were there, but they've left the town. They retreated to a military base next to the airport.
The separatists are in control?
Yes. They have declared themselves to be the local government.
Yes. They have declared themselves to be the local government.
But some of the police are still there. We saw them – are they working with the separatists or with the Kiev government?
I don't know. Before the military assault on the police station at Mariupol, the police were here, working this checkpoint with us. But, after the blow-up, they left us. There was anarchy in the city – looting and fighting. I don't know who's in control.
I don't know. Before the military assault on the police station at Mariupol, the police were here, working this checkpoint with us. But, after the blow-up, they left us. There was anarchy in the city – looting and fighting. I don't know who's in control.
Interfax - Ukraine ......
LATEST NEWS
Russia's attitude to Ukraine's presidential elections to affect EU's possible sanctions, says Fule 11:35
Poland hopes visa-free travel between Ukraine, EU will begin in mid-2015, says PM 16:49
Kiev Post ...... Kiev slaps at West and in particular France , Germany and the UK !
It's all about the money
More than two months after Russia destroyed the post-Cold War order by invading and annexing Crimea, European Union heavyweights France, Germany and even Great Britain continue to dither in the face of Vladimir Putin’s aggression.
Their weakness has shown that business lobbies in the three nations are willing to turn a blind eye to Moscow’s war crimes as long as their companies are making money. Now we understand better why two world wars started in Europe and the dangers of appeasement.
The EU still hasn’t grasped the reality that Russia is not a partner but rather a great threat to world peace, with the Kremlin richly deserving isolation and the harshest economic sanctions for its assault on Ukraine. This means the West should punish Russia’s energy, finance, military and hi-tech sectors – all of which the three nations play key parts in feeding.
What else besides greed and denial of reality would explain France’s willingness to arm Russia, as it is poised to do in October when it is scheduled to deliver the first of two modern Mistral warships to the Kremlin? The $1.6 billion contract, shockingly, was entered into two years after Russia’s dismemberment of Georgia. The attack ships are capable of menacing all of Russia’s threatened neighbors.
France’s argument for going through with the deal boils down to two unjustifiable points: We need the money and nobody else is sacrificing. French leaders are right about the lack of sacrifice, but that does not excuse their cowardly actions.
Germany is playing a dangerous game of self-delusion by thinking that it somehow stands between the West and East. Some of the German news media have latched on to the Kremlin propaganda that Ukraine is part of a new U.S.-Russia showdown and that Ukraine is now run by “fascists.” The recent “peace” mission of German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who represents the loathsome Russophile wing once led by the morally bankrupt Putin shill Gerhard Schroeder, underscores Germany’s lack of leadership. If any people should know what it’s like to live under the jackboot of fascist, mentally unstable dictators, it’s Germany.
Great Britain, meanwhile, talks a tough game, but continues to protect London’s status as money launderer for Putin’s kleptocracy.
These three powers could cripple Russia’s energy and finance sectors, as well as hurt its military sector. France is correct in saying that U.S. President Barack Obama’s weak response to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s use of chemical weapons against his own people encouraged Putin. But it is, again, no excuse for France’s dangerous military sales.
The United States and the EU are focused on walking in lockstep to the detriment of making forward progress. The West should prove the Kremlin wrong by staying united yet showing a willingness to sacrifice collectively and act quickly to secure world peace and Ukraine’s future.
Arming the enemy
May 17, 2014, 10:16 a.m. | Ukraine — by Isaac Webb
The Vladivostok warship, a Mistral class LHD amphibious ship, is in a shipyard in France’s Saint-Nazaire. France’s planned sale of two attack warships to Russia for $1.6 billion has triggered alarm in the West following the Kremlin’s military invasion and annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula, as well as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s support for separatists in eastern Ukraine. (AFP)
The sale of two French Mistral class warships to Russia is making waves on both sides of the Atlantic.
When the French government signed a $1.6 billion contract in 2010 to sell Russia the two amphibious assault ships, no one envisaged that Russia would annex Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula and threaten a deeper military invasion of the nation.
U.S. officials, however, have warned about the sale for years.
Former U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates noted in February 2010 that the sale “would send the wrong message to Russia and to our allies in Central and East Europe.”
The ships put dangerous weapons into the hands of an increasingly militaristic and expansionist Russia under President Vladimir Putin, who sounds determined to reclaim former Soviet lands. The ships pose a grave danger especially to Russia’s neighbors, especially in the Black Sea.
U.S. Senator Mark Warner, the Virginia Democrat who serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee, noted in a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama that each of the ships would be able to carry 16 helicopters, four landing craft, 60 armored vehicles, 13 tanks and up to 700 soldiers, according to The New York Times.
Following the Russian invasion of the Georgian provinces of South Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2008, Russian navy chief Vladimir Vysotsky said that Russia could have completed the operation in “40 minutes, instead of 26 hours” if it had ships like the Mistral.
Speaking to National Public Radio, Georgia’s Ambassador to France Ecaterine Siradze-Delaunay said countries have a “moral responsibility” not to assist countries that occupy parts of other nations.
When asked whether the U.S. and France are on the same page in an interview with CNN on May 12, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius responded, “I think so, provided that everybody makes the same sacrifices.”
The Mistral controversy is just one part of the sanctions debate against Russia.
So far, the U.S. and the European Union have imposed relatively mild sanctions that target individuals and a few companies. There is fierce resistance among Western companies about imposing sectoral sanctions against Russian banking, energy and other interests.
But such collective action and sacrifice are required for sanctions to be effective against Russia, whose economy is slipping into recession.
In a May 7 op-ed for the Financial Times, Markus Kerber, the director-general of the Federation of German Industries argued that it is German industry’s “responsibility to try to help end” the crisis in Ukraine, even if that cuts into corporate profits.
Kerber’s opinion comes as executives from Siemens, Adidas, Volkswagen, and other major German corporations have expressed their opposition to more severe economic sanctions on Russian corporations. They are touting reports that deeper sanctions could cut German economic growth by 0.9 percent this year and 0.3 percent next year.
Because the EU trades much more with Russia than the U.S., it has more influence – and stands to gain and lose more, also. U.S.-Russia bilateral trade totaled only $38 billion in 2013, whereas EU-Russia bilateral trade was $461 billion.
Fabius, the French foreign minister, emphasized that sanctions should not cripple the European economy: “It is not sanctions against Europe, but Russia. Let’s not forget that.”
Yet Kerber conceded that “economic sanctions may be the one way to make Russia feel the strength of Western determination.”
Skirting St. Petersburg
Though the U.S. has been keen to isolate Russia, some American companies have circumvented sanctions and are continuing to do business with blacklisted Russians.
Since 1997, the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, scheduled for May 22-24 this year, has brought global business leaders together to promote economic growth.
Because American sanctions prohibit U.S. citizens from conducting business with sanctioned Russian officials, many top executives, including those at Morgan Stanley, IHS, and Goldman Sachs, have decided to skip the forum this year. The decisions came after top White House officials pressured American CEOs not to participate in the Putin-sponsored forum.
However, since U.S. sanctions affect only U.S. citizens and not companies, CEOs can still send representatives.
A spokesperson from Goldman Sachs told the Kyiv Post that it was “highly unlikely that [Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd] Blankfein would attend the St. Petersburg Forum,” but that it was likely that someone from their Moscow office would attend.
Mark Weinberger, the CEO of Ernst & Young and an American citizen, has also been removed from the list of forum participants, according to a statement released by the company. He has been replaced an executive from South Africa.
International Paper CEO John Faraci has decided not to attend the conference, although a spokesperson from the company told the Kyiv Post that International Paper will be represented by “high level executives.”
Caterpillar spokesperson Rachel Potts said that the company plans to send a representative to the event, but declined to say whether President Donald James Umpleby III, whose name is on the list of participants, will attend.
Although some American corporations have skirted the sanctions, others may profit from them. SpaceX, which specializes in private space flight, is one such corporation.
The company has objected to the federal government awarding a single-source contract to United Launch Alliance for military-satellite launches. United Launch Alliance is a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin that uses rocket engines produced by a Russian company connected to Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was added to the American list of sanctioned officials following the Russian annexation of Crimea in March.
A federal judge issued then lifted an injunction that prevents United Launch Alliance from working with NPO Energomash, the company with which Rogozin is affiliated. However, if the Treasury and State Department make an “affirmative determination” about Rogozin’s relationship with NPO Energomash, another injunction could be issued.
Rogozin later threatened to prevent the export of Russian engines for use in American military launches. If Rogozin follows through on this threat, United Launch Alliance would be forced to find a new supplier and SpaceX would be poised to step in.
On May 12, the EU lengthened its list of sanctioned individuals connected to the crisis in Ukraine, adding 13 Russians and Ukrainians, including Russian President Vladimir Putin’s first deputy chief of staff Vyacheslav Volodin. The sanctioned individuals will face travel bans and asset freezes.
The sanctions, which were levied because of “the absence of any steps towards de-escalation” include Crimean gas company Chornomornaftogaz and Feodosia, a Crimean oil supply company, both of which were owned by the Ukrainian government before being taken over by Crimean authorities since Russia annexed the peninsula in March. Chornomornaftogaz’s and Feodosia’s assets in the EU will be frozen as a result of the sanctions.
Though the EU sanctioned more people and firms, it would’ve been further expanded if not for interference from European oil and gas executives. According to Russian business newspaper Vedomosti, top European energy officials worked hard to prevent Alexey Miller, the head of Russian state-owned energy giant Gazprom, from being added to the list.
More sanctions may be on the way, however. Western officials have signaled that Russian interference in Ukraine’s May 25 presidential elections will trigger deeper sanctions.
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said on May 13 that the EU has “to be prepared for what to do if someone prevents the elections on May 25...If that is going to happen ... then we have to think about further sanctions.”
No comments:
Post a Comment