Tepco just can't get out of their own way wih their lies.....

http://enenews.com/report-tepco-reveals-damage-to-area-near-photoshopped-location-at-fukushima-unit-4-photo

Title: TEPCO Soundness Report On Unit 4 Admits Larger Failures
Source: SimplyInfo
Date: Sept 5, 2012

TEPCO released two reports in Japanese last week on order of NISA to explain the soundness of unit 4.

[...]

The new reports make some key admissions. The west and south walls are degrading and also may have been worse than TEPCO had previously admitted. Floor damage is also expanded from what was previously reported. Cracks on the inside of the west wall was also reported for the first time. It appears some of this is building degradation and some is new findings as they gain access to more areas of the building for closer inspections.

[...]

The August 2012 report in Japanese shows the west wall [...] 4th floor as failed with the entire 3rd floor now failed with half of the 2nd floor now partially failed. In May 2011 the 2nd floor was assumed sound. This newly declared partially damaged area is above the garage door opening TEPCO has attempted to photoshop out of recent images.

and......







http://enenews.com/tepco-admits-we-replaced-photo-for-physical-protection-of-nuclear-materials

First, Tepco released the badly altered photo, which was deleted and replaced with an alteration of the original alteration. Now Tepco has altered their original statement on the alterations.

Perhaps they will elaborate on what ‘nuclear materials’ are visible in that area around Unit 4, and why the materials need ‘physical protection’.

Title: Results of the Second Soundness Inspection of Unit 4 Reactor Building at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
Source: TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY – Photos and Videos Library
Date: September 4, 2012

(5)West wall (Exterior wall)

Photo taken on August 22, 2012

We replaced the photo for physical protection of nuclear materials.

Original Statement:

(5)West wall (Exterior wall)

Photo taken on August 22, 2012

We had fabricated a part of the photo in terms of physical protection. We replaced the photo of which the fabrication may be taken inappropriate.