Cass Sunstein steps dow ( good news ! ) .... replacement seems like a Bolshevik though .....The enemy ( Al Qaeda ) of my enemy ( Al Qaeda ) is my friend ?

http://www.infowars.com/obamas-authoritarian-adviser-sunstein-steps-down/

Obama’s Authoritarian Adviser Sunstein Steps Down

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 3, 2012

Cass Sunstein, Obama’s administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget, has announced his departure. He will leave later this month and return to Harvard Law School.

Sunstein gained notoriety on a number of fronts. He called for dispatching government agents to sabotage individuals and groups opposed to government – most notably those at odds with the official 9/11 narrative – and suggested thegovernment hold people responsible for the information they post on the internet.

In May of 2011, former president Bill Clinton adopted Sunstein’s idea of creating an internet Ministry of Truth.

“Couching the idea in the kind of doublespeak rhetoric that would make George Orwell roll in his grave, Clinton said that the agency would have to be ‘independent’ and ‘transparent,’ but that it would be created and run by the federal government – a complete oxymoron,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote at the time.

In addition to proposing a new COINTELPRO to attack enemies of the state on the internet, Sunstein worked to craft minutiae of the emerging globalist order. In April of this year, he penned a piece for the Wall Street Journal calling for an attack on national sovereignty. He wrotethat “unnecessary regulatory differences across nations” are harmful to the “interdependent global economy,” in other words the globalist dream of a one-world economic dictatorship driven by the elite and their unelected apparatchiks.

“President Obama has worked closely with his Canadian and Mexican counterparts to create High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Councils with both countries,” Sunstein wrote, lauding the effort to fashion a North American Union. “The councils are developing and implementing plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary burdens on cross-border trade, streamline regulatory requirements, and promote greater certainty for the general public and for businesses in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology and other areas.” He also noted that work continues to “harmonize” one world government in partnership with the European Union.

Boris Bershteyn, the budget office’s general counsel, will replace Sunstein as acting director. Bershteyn is a natural choice. He was born in the Soviet Union, earned his law chops at Yale, and was selected as a “fellow” by the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans. Paul Soros is the elder brother of the notorious globalist and darling of the financial class, George Soros.

and ...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-post-should-obama-and-congress-be-arrested-under-ndaa

Guest Post: Should Obama And Congress Be Arrested Under The NDAA?

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/04/2012 21:04 -0400

• Guest Post
 
• John McCain
 
• Obama Administration
 
• President Obama
 
• Reality

Submitted by John Aziz of Azizonomics

Should Obama And Congress Be Arrested Under The NDAA?

Should President Obama (alongside Lindsay Graham and John McCain) be wearing an orange jumpsuit?

Welcome to the beautiful and surreal reality of life under American corporatism, under a Congress that churns out thousands  and thousands of pages of (often contradictory) legislation a year.

If providing material assistance to al-Qaeda is illegal under the National Defence Authorization Act (2012), and Obama and Congress are sending $25 million of aid to al-Qaeda-affiliated Syrian opposition, aren’t Congress and President Obama violating their own law? Should Obama (or at least the Justice Department) not be using “all necessary and appropriate force” including “the power to indefinitely detain” to prevent Obama and Congress from assisting al-Qaeda? Did anyone in Congress or the Obama administration even bother to read the law that they were signing? Do Federal laws no longer apply to lawmakers?

The only question left from this abrupt and absurd turnaround — from funding bin Laden’s mujahideen thirty years ago, to ten years ago declaring war on al-Qaeda, to today sending them material assistance — would appear to be whether or not Obama will pull a 1984 and claim that “we have always been at war with Eurasia“.

and.....




http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-08-03/should-we-arrest-dc-politicians-supporting-al-qaeda

Should We Arrest D.C. Politicians for Supporting Al Qaeda?

Submitted by George Washington on 08/03/2012 13:12 -0400

• Iran

In the name of "fighting Al Qaeda or associated forces" or those who "support" those bad guys, the U.S. government has authorized:

• Assassinating people anywhere in the world without due process or even a legal charge . . .

• including U.S. citizens living on American soil

• Indefinitely detaining any American - without trial (and seethis)

• Torturing people . . .

• including Americans living on American soil

• Labeling virtually any American as a "terrorist"

In other words, the government has shredded our constitution and destroyed our freedom and liberties in order to fight Al Qaeda and associated forces.

And yet the government is itself supporting - with money, arms, and logistical support - Al Qaeda and associated forces in a number of nations.

The U.S. is supporting Al Qaeda and other terrorists in Syria. America funds terrorist groups within Iran. And we supported Al Qaeda terrorists in Libya (and here).

Does that mean that American military and law enforcement personnel should arrest, indefinitely detain, label as "terrorists", torture or assassinate those in D.C. who are authorizing the support?

and...

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/u-s-fighting-on-the-same-side-as-three-terrorist-groups-in-syria.html

U.S. Fights Side-By-Side With Three Terrorist Groups In Syria

Al Qaeda is supporting the Syrian opposition.

So is the Muslim Brotherhood.

And Hamas.

This is curious, given that the U.S. is supporting the Syrian opposition (and see this), considering military options for ousting the Syrian government, American allies Britain and Qatar allegedly already have foreign troops inside Syria, and the U.S. has been planning regime change in Syria for over 50 years.

I thought Al Qaeda, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood were America’s mortal enemies. Why are we backing terrorists?

If Hezbollah joins the opposition, it will be a clean sweep.