http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-02/air-force-grounds-squadrons-fighter-jets-drones-due-shut-down
( Paging Al Qaeda....... )
Air Force Grounds Squadrons Of Fighter Jets, Drones Due To Shut Down
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/02/2013 21:28 -0400
Hopefully Great Britain doesn't get the idea of finally reclaiming its rebellious colonies lost over two hundred years ago, because the US certainly is making it easy. As part of the numerous non-essential services shut down in the current government funding crisis, Foreign Policy reports that the Air Force's Air Combat Command (ACC) - home to the service's fighter jets, B-1 bombers and most of its drones and spyplanes -- has grounded squadrons that are not set to deploy abroad after January.
"If you're on to the hook to deploy before January, we're saying go ahead and train," ACC spokesman Lt. Col. Tadd Sholtis told FP. However, if a unit is waiting until after that, its aircraft will remain on the ground. A striking example of this can be found at Mountain Home Air Force Base in Idaho. None of the 366th Fighter Wing's squadrons of F-15E Strike Eagles are slated to deploy before January. This means the only fighters based at Mountain Home flying this fall are the F-15SGs of the Singaporean air force that are permanently stationed there. Interestingly, German and Canadian air force jets are also flying out of the Idaho base on training deployments of their own.
While the Canadians are relatively safe, one may want to keep an eye on those Germans. Because somehow it makes sense that a tiny fraction of the NSA's homeland espionage "introverts" may be furloughed, but a whopping 75% of the ACC civilians are now forced to sit at home, twiddling their thumbs. There is a silver lining though: drone command crews have also been grounded which means America's spreading of US moral superiority and liberating of various natural resource assets around the world by remote control, may be paused.
In addition to squadrons set to deploy, ACC squadrons that train F-22 Raptor, MC-12 Liberty and the command's various drone crews will remain airborne. Of ACC's 10,000 civilians, 7,500 are at home. Given the fact that the command is still providing fighters, bombers and spyplanes around the globe, it may have to find a way to bring some of these people back to work if the shutdown continues for too long."There continues to be a high demand for combat airpower during the shutdown, and unfortunately we have fewer people supporting only moderately reduced operations," said Sholtis. "Should the current shutdown persist, we may need to bring additional personnel back to work in order to continue to support operational requirements."
Mountain Home AFB is not the only one to be impacted. As BND reports, Scott Air Force Base in Illinois is also feeling the brunt:
More than 3,400 civilian workers were sent home Tuesday on unpaid furlough from the air base as a result of the partial government shutdown that took effect at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.About 1,800 civilian workers, whose work is deemed mission critical, showed up for work, but won't be paid the money they are owed until the shutdown ends....A reduction in training hours caused by the government shutdown led the 126th Air National Guard Refueling Wing on Tuesday to ground its eight KC-135 Air Stratotankers for the time being, according to Col. Pete Nazamis, the wing commander.Since Congress has not passed a 2014 fiscal year budget, "right now we don't have any flying hours, so we can't even do training sorties because there's no budget, there's no appropriation," Nezamis said. "We can't fly just normal training missions every day because we don't have an appropriation for training for this fiscal year. ... All training has been terminated until further notice."Also as a result of the goverment shutdown, the wing gave unpaid furloughs to about 200 civilian employees Tuesday morning. As with other units at the base, exemptions were made for nearly 108 fulltime fulltime national guard members deemed critical to the wing mission, Nezamis said.However, the KC-135s may be deployed to fly critical missions to support national security, "then we could be asked to fly in support of contingency operations or critical missions, things like that," he said.
Well, if anyone ever needed a window of opportunity to attack the US, be it the US "allies" in the failed attempt to overthrow the Syrian government or the domestic, tea-party types, or if the media needed a credible narrative in which to frame just such an event, now is the perfect time.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-02/house-republicans-plan-link-debt-limit-and-shutdown-one-fiscal-fight
( I bet Obama folds especially if Wall Street doesn't help out without a market TARPesque crash.... And as I thought , the shutdown will go into next week - that is when we should start to see " reactions " ! )
House Republicans Plan To Link Debt-Limit And Shutdown Into One Fiscal Fight
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/02/2013 20:26 -0400
Nancy Pelosi tried hard this evening (in the post WH meeting presser) to position the Democrats in order to disavow the inevitable but now Bloomberg is reporting that:
- *HOUSE REPUBLICAN PLAN WOULD LINK SHUTDOWN, DEBT-LIMIT FIGHTS
House Republican leaders plan to bring up a measure to raise the U.S. debt-limit as soon as next week as part of a new attempt to force President Barack Obama to negotiate on the budget by merging the disputes over ending the government shutdown and raising the debt ceiling into one fiscal fight. This is not what most sell-side strategists expected as a base-case; in fact it is close to a worst-case for many - especially given Obama's apparent unwillingness to negotiate.
Via Bloomberg,
House Republican leaders plan to bring up a measure to raise the U.S. debt-limit as soon as next week as part of a new attempt to force President Barack Obama to negotiate on the budget, according to three people with knowledge of the strategy.The approach would merge the disputes over ending the government shutdown and raising the debt ceiling into one fiscal fight.“I’d like to get one agreement and be done,” House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy told reporters today without offering details.Republican leaders are attempting to pair their party’s priorities with a debt-limit increase, a plan they shelved last month to focus on a stopgap measure to fund the government in the new fiscal year.The goal is to have a bill ready in coming days, even without resolving the partial government shutdown, according to a Republican lawmaker and two leadership aides who asked not to be identified to discuss the strategy.
So... uh...
The President made clear to the Leaders that he is not going to negotiate over the need for Congress to act to reopen the government."But the Republicans plan to link the debt ceiling to the re-opening of government...
It seems - as President Obama warned - this time is different (no matter how much the Fed tries to do, we suspect the politicians 'need' a crash to get something done)...
but the President's state position remains ......
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-02/obama-issues-statement-not-going-negotiate-after-all
Obama Issues Statement, "Not Going To Negotiate" After All
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/02/2013 20:17 -0400
Earlier, on CNBC, Obama said he is "prepared to negotiate." As it turns out, he may have been confused about the meaning of the bolded word because less than four hours later, the White House issued a statement in which "The President made clear to the Leaders that he is not going to negotiate over the need for Congress to act to reopen the government."
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 2, 2013Readout of the President’s Meeting with Congressional LeadershipTonight, the President hosted a meeting with the members of the Congressional Leadership that lasted for over an hour. The President made clear to the Leaders that he is not going to negotiate over the need for Congress to act to reopen the government or to raise the debt limit to pay the bills Congress has already incurred. The President reinforced his view that the House should put the clean government funding bill that has been passed by the Senate up for a vote – a bill that would pass a majority of the House with bipartisan support. The House could act today to reopen the government and stop the harm this shutdown is causing to the economy and families across the country. The President remains hopeful that common sense will prevail, and that Congress will not only do its job to reopen the government, but also act to pay the bills it has racked up and spare the nation from a devastating default. The President is glad that the Leaders were able to engage in this useful discussion this evening.
And since we are discussing Obama's linguistic capacity, perhaps another word he may wnat to loo up is "prevent. As in the following:
President Barack Obama said on Wednesday his selection of a nominee to head the Federal Reserve when Chairman Ben Bernanke's term ends in January will prevent asset bubbles from forming but will also try to lower a high jobless rate. "They're going to be making sure that they keep an eye on inflation, that they're notencouraging some of the bubbles that we've seen in our economy that have resulted in busts," Obama said in an interview on CNBC. "But they're also going to stay focused on the fact that our unemployment rate is still too high."
It's been a long day, but we are fairly confident not even the world's greatest thesaurus lists "actively promotes and carefully cultivates" as a synonym to "prevent."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-02/white-house-meeting-ends-failure-boehner-says-obama-reiterated-he-will-not-negotiate
White House Meeting Ends In Failure: Boehner Says Obama "Reiterated He Will Not Negotiate"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/02/2013 19:04 -0400
Any hopes that tonight's meeting between the president and members of Congress, which lasted about an hour, would yield results just went up in smoke:
- BOEHNER SPEAKS AFTER MEETING WITH OBAMA AT WHITE HOUSE
- BOEHNER SAID OBAMA REITERATED HE WILL NOT NEGOTIATE
- BOEHNER SAYS TIME FOR SENATE TO APPOINT NEGOTIATORS
Reid chimes in:
- REID SAYS BOEHNER HAS TO ACCEPT `YES FOR AN ANSWER'
And so the government shutdown proceeds into its third day, with little hope for a political resolution on the horizon.
Cue the " helpful " market crash to get the GOP House's attention !
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-02/obama-prepared-negotiate-after-government-reopens-says-time-wall-street-should-be-co
Obama "Prepared To Negotiate" (After Government Reopens), Says This Time "Wall Street Should Be Concerned"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/02/2013 16:24 -0400
In an interview with CNBC's John Harwood, Obama once again shows why the polarization in Congress is at record levels. In a brief: he said he is "exasperated", and that the shutdown is "entirely unncessary" but adds that he is (finally?) prepared to negotiate, however only after he gets his way namely after the government is reopened. And another important talking point: Obama added that while gridlock in D.C. is nothing new, "this time I think Wall Street should be concerned." It is unclear how that statement makes any sense in light of Obama's right hand senator Chuck Schumer telling the man who is really in charge, Ben Bernanke, to get to work. Unless of course, Obama is now angling for a "concerning" market crash, which sends the Dow down by 20% like in the summer of 2011, and Obama can tell the stunned public "I told you so."
Additionally, it wouldn't be an Obama theatrical presentation without the usual solid dose of scapegoating and blaming: "When you have a situation in which a faction is willing to default on U.S. obligations, then we are in trouble.... If we get into the habit where one party is allowed to extort, ... then any president who comes after me we be unable to govern effectively." The good news: we have confirmation that there will be presidents after Obama.
Obama would not comment on who he's likely to nominate to succeed Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.
"Ben's still there's; he's doing a fine job," he said. The ultimate nominee would have to keep an eye on inflation and employment, in keeping with the Fed's dual mandate, the president said.
On Obamacare, the president's most significant legislative accomplishment, Obama said that despite certain polls showing it was unpopular with specific segments of the population—namely white people—the law would ultimately be accepted by the population at large.
Tenets of the bill are popular among "all races" the president said. "The majority of the people who will be helped by the ACA will be white," he said.
The complete Obama interview is below:
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/10/02/obama-nudges-wall-street-maybe-its-time-to-panic-over-this-debt-ceiling-deadline/
Obama nudges Wall Street: Maybe it’s time to panic over this debt-ceiling deadline
POSTED AT 5:21 PM ON OCTOBER 2, 2013 BY ALLAHPUNDIT
Nothing complicated here. In order to strengthen his hand in negotiations, the president’s decided to try to kickstart a hopefully not-too-damaging market sell-off over the debt ceiling. The more the Dow drops tomorrow, the more Boehner and other moderate Republicans will think twice about letting this process play out all the way up to the deadline on October 17th. And if the market doesn’t dive sharply enough — maybe “only” 200 or 300 points — he can always nudge it again next week with more dire rhetoric. It might take losing a thousand points or even two, but damn it, if that’s what it takes to teach these tea partiers not to scare the hell out of markets by behaving irresponsibly, then oh well.
The irony is, some of the GOP’s critics have said, not without reason, that some damage from hitting the debt ceiling might be incurred before we actually hit it if investors lose faith that this is just brinksmanship and that the two sides will make a deal before the debt limit is reached. Well, here’s O telling them: Yep, your faith that the United States will certainly meet its credit obligations might be misplaced. And his party will forgive him for it, of course. Just two days ago, the Times published the latest in an undying series of liberal commentary calling on Obama to ignore the law and raise the debt ceiling himself, either via the Fourteenth Amendment or by, ahem, minting a trillion-dollar platinum coin. What’s a little market panic, which of course will be blamed on Republicans, compared to “solutions” as drastic as that?
Exit quotation:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-02/bankers-warn-obama-dont-mess-debt-ceiling-again
Bankers Warn Obama, Don't Mess With The Debt Ceiling (Again)
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/02/2013 14:50 -0400
Via Bloomberg,
- Bank of America
- Bank of America
- Debt Ceiling
- default
- Fail
- headlines
- Lloyd Blankfein
- President Obama
- Reserve Currency
- White House
15 Bankers just paid a visit to the White House, listened to President Obama, and explained what a total disaster it would be if the US debt-ceiling is breached and Treasuries technically default. While the politicians exclaimed how bad a government shutdown would be, thebanks have turned the panic dial to 11 as Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein noted, bankers are “in a position to really know early what the consequences are,” and it would be catastrophic. The irony that the firm which the government is trying to fine $20 billion for selling fraudulent debt and giving bad advice is now providing the same government with advice on its own bad debt, is not lost on us as Dimon was among the visitors but it is Blankfein's warning, echoing Obama, that will get the headlines, "they shouldn't use the threat of causing the U.S. to fail on its obligation to repay debt as a cudgel."
Via Bloomberg,
Blankfein - "You can litigate these policy issues, you can relitigate these policy issues in a public forum, but they shouldn't use the threat of causing the U.S. to fail on its obligation to repay debt as a cudgel."*BLANKFEIN: BANK CEOS EXPLAINED IN MTG HOW BAD DEFAULT WOULD BE*BLANKFEIN SAYS HE'S `NOT ANXIOUS' TO BE WITNESS TO DEFAULT*BLANKFEIN SAYS ECONOMIC DAMAGE OF DEFAULT WOULD BE `SEVERE'“There’s no debate on the seriousness of the U.S. not paying its debt,” Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan tells reporters after he, other executives met with President Obama.Default might affect small businesses, TreasuriesDebt ceiling fight in Aug. 2011 led “to a slowdown in the economy, and we’re facing that again”Bankers are “in a position to really know early what the consequences are,” Goldman’s Lloyd Blankfein tells reportersSays bankers “listened” in conversation with Obama, thentold him “exactly how bad it would be”Blankfein: “There’s precedent for a government shutdown; there’s no precedent for default”“We’re the most important economy in the world, we’re the reserve currency in the world, payments have to go out to people”“If money doesn’t flow in, then money doesn’t flow out, so we really haven’t seen this before and I’m not anxious to be part of the process to witness this”
http://www.businessinsider.com/government-shutdown-turning-into-debt-ceiling-standoff-2013-10
Last night, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew came out and said that the Treasury was close to exhausting its "extraordinary measures" that it has to keep funding itself (once it's no longer able to issue new debt) and that the US WILL hit the debt ceiling on October 17 as planned.
This warning is unprecedented in that it's coming in the middle of a tense government shutdown.
The growing conclusion is that this will not be a short one-or-two day shutdown (no real progress was made yesterday) and that it could extend all the way until the debt ceiling, which will force some kind of negotiation.
On Capitol Hill there were signs only of the two sides digging into their respective corners, with the House Republican Conference having what several sources described as their best conference in months after Speaker John Boehner’s demands to gut Obamacare prompted the budget impasse. And at a private Democratic lunch in the Senate’s ornate Mansfield Room, speaker after speaker heaped praised on Reid for his no-compromise stand, attendees said.
And increasingly, the two policy disputes — raising the debt ceiling and keeping the government funded in the new fiscal year — seemed bound to become tied together.
“It will all get solved at one time,” said Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.).
There's good and bad news.
The good news is the action is starting now, and the market and the outside world has been forced to focus on this, thanks to the fact that the government is (partially) closed. That means pressure begins soon in getting a deal.
The bad news is that this turns into one giant big bang. As Paul Ryan has said, by rolling it all together, the GOP gets maximum leverage.
Someone Is Getting Very Nervous
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/01/2013 13:21 -0400
A look at the stocks surge today and one would get the impression that not only should the government shutdown be permanent (closing the Fed would have a vastly different result on the S&P), but that the debt ceiling is completely irrelevant and immaterial for risk assets. One would get a far different impression by looking at today's just concluded 4-Week Bill auction. Today's outlier rate on the just priced $35 billion in 4-week bills can be seen quite dramatically on the chart below, and is evidence that someone (or someones) is getting quite nervous ahead of the events in the next few weeks.
What is going on here and why the spike? Recall what we said a week ago in "Here Is How To Trade The Debt Ceiling Showdown."
... there is a simple pair trade for those who would like to position for a contentious debt ceiling fight with an ETA mid-October and skip the bipolar and HFT-dominated equity markets. Recall that in the summer of 2011 when the last big debt ceiling debacle loomed and resulted in a last minute outcome that also led to the downgrade of the US by a rating agency that has since sold out, rates of bills due just before the debt ceiling D-Date soared, while those sufficiently after the ceiling interval tightened. Well, the same trade is just as applicable this time.Sell October 31 Bills versus 12 Month BillsSupply dynamics and potential market concerns around a debt ceiling stand-off in Washingtonshould push the 1M1Y bill curve flatter... The October 31 bills are likely the most vulnerable, and should cheapen significantly versus 12 month bills in a protracted fight.One-month and three month bills are already trading close to zero, having briefly traded negative last week. With bill supply to remain flat heading into the end of October, suggesting that supply should keep bills yields across the curve under pressure. With bill yields largely beholden to supply dynamics, the greatest scope for further compression is in year bills, which are currently trading around 10bp. Given historical relationship between bills yields and bills outstanding, year bills are roughly 3bp rich to supply-implied fair value, while 3-month bills are about 3.5bp rich.This trade may be difficult to put on in size until after quarter end due to dealers balance sheet constraints. But as noted above, we believe that the market will not begin to fully price the risk to front end bills until about two weeks before the end date. We expect the opportunity to remain available at for the first week of October.
Sure enough, today is the first day of the next quarter (window dressing is over), and the bond market, if not so much the stock market, has finally awakened that the government shutdown is merely an indication of just how contentious the debt ceiling negotiation very likely ill be, and that it is increasingly likely that the X-Date of October 18 may come and go without a deal, which just may result in a technical default on the nearest maturity Bills.
End result: today's auction was an absolute abortion and absent some deus ex machinaagreement between the GOP and Democrats, one can expect the October 31 bills (and others just around them) to continue blowing wider as quietly but confidently those holding the most at risk paper exit stage left.
But that's not all. We also noted the following:
The last go-round, the 1m1y curve flattened to 3bp. Though the curve is just 6bp away from that right now, it is beginning from a starting point that is 10bp flatter than one month prior to the 2011 debt ceiling. The securities that the market viewed as “at risk” traded with yields above year bills, hence our recommendation to sell the October 31 issue rather than the current one month bills.We think that the curve has scope to flatten to zero, if not further,depending on how close to the wire negotiations come.
As of moments ago, the curve has gone beyond flat and into "further" as the 1M1Y just wentnegative.
Futures Slide In Delayed Shutdown Response
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/02/2013 - 07:15
If yesterday was the paradoxical government shutdown "relief rally" pushed higher by a last minute VIX smashing ramp, today reality is starting to set in and global stocks and US futures are set to open mcuhmuch lower. The FTSE MIB remains the only European bourse to trade in positive territory in today’s session, having touched upon 2 year highs as it is expected the political tumult that threatened to cause a collapse of the Italian government will be resolved today even as the latest news indicate Berlusconi's PDL will support the Bunga godfather after all. Other European equities have failed to benefit from this as market participants remain cautious ahead of the ECB rate decision today when Draghi may or may not (most likely) announce a new LTRO.
http://www3.blogs.rollcall.com/218/democrats-turn-back-gops-piecemeal-funding-strategy/
Democrats Turn Back GOP’s Piecemeal Funding Strategy
Posted at 8:06 p.m. on Oct. 1
House Republicans tried to soften the blow — in reality and politically — of a government shutdown Tuesday with bills that would provide funding for veterans, for national parks and for the District of Columbia. But Democrats said no.
Republicans tried to pass the three bills under suspension of the rules, in which a two-thirds majority is required. But Democrats, who characterized them as face-saving measures after forcing a government shutdown, refused.
The House rejected the veterans affairs funding bill, 264-164, with 33 Democrats joining all Republicans in support of the measure. The national parks bill was rejected 252-176, with 22 Democrats joining all but one Republican (Rep. Don Young of Alaska) in support of the measure; the D.C. funding bill was rejected 265-163, with 34 Democrats joining all Republicans in support of the measure.
House Rules Chairman Pete Sessions, R-Texas, said his panel would bring the three bills up under a rule on Wednesday, so Republicans could pass the measures with a simple majority. It’s an open question whether Sessions would allow Democrats to have a standard motion to recommit on the bills, for fear that Democrats would force Republicans to go on record opposing a “clean” CR through a procedural vote.
House Republicans had hoped to force Democrats to concede to fund the government piece by piece by putting generally noncontroversial bills on the floor, or, at least, make Democrats reject funding popular programs.
Leading up to the government shutdown, Democrats joined with Republicans in both chambers to overwhelmingly pass a bill that would ensure the troops continued to get paid in the event of lapsed appropriations.
But Democrats largely united against the mini-continuing resolutions in a statement against the Republicans’ gesture of “cherry-picking” certain programs and functions to reopen, going with the low-hanging fruits and not more contentious agencies such as the IRS and the EPA.
“The idea of shutting down the whole government and then when we get adverse reaction from our constituents we pick and choose, we open up a few. What happens tomorrow when the Social Security Administration comes to us and says, ‘What about the 16,000 employees we just furloughed?’” said Rep. James P. Moran, D-Va., who went on to call the strategy an “act of desperation” and “a band-aid.”
“They took hostages by shutting down the government and now they are releasing one hostage at a time,” said Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
Knowing they would be denied, Democrats took turns offering unanimous consent requests for the House to bring up the Senate’s “clean” CR. Time and time again, the presiding officer, Rep. Randy Hultgren, R-Ill., shot down the requests.
Democrats tried the tactic so many times that Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., made a point of order to ask, “At what point does it become dilatory activity inconsistent with proper decorum of the House?”
The White House said earlier in the day that President Barack Obama would veto the stand-alone CR’s should they make their way to the Oval Office — that outcome is unlikely, asSenate Democrats have declared their unwillingness to engage with House Republicans in such a tactic.
“How does the White House justify signing the troop funding bill, but vetoing similar measures for veterans, National Parks, and the District of Columbia?” asked Michael Steel, a spokesman for Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, in a statement. “The President can’t continue to complain about the impact of the government shutdown on veterans, visitors at National parks, and DC while vetoing bills to help them.
“The White House position is unsustainably hypocritical,” Steel said.
The bill to fund the operations of the District of Columbia through Dec. 15 was perhaps thought to be a gift to Democrats, who have traditionally aligned themselves with D.C. residents more so than their GOP counterparts in the fight for self-determination. But Democrats turned away the measure, sticking to their broader political strategy to defeat the piecemeal bills in defiance of the new Republican approach.
Rep. José E. Serrano, D-N.Y., a longtime ally of the District and ranking member on the appropriations subcommittee that has jurisdiction over D.C. affairs, suggested that he would have to avoid Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., for the next few days, suggesting that his “no” vote would have consequences for their relationship going forward.
“This is a sham of a process and a fake bill, designed by the tea party, for the tea party and of the tea party,” said Serrano. “This is part of a trick.”
At one point appearing as though she were close to tears, Norton delivered an impassioned plea for members to vote to fund D.C. through the government shutdown.
“What would you do if your local budget was here? Would you mention it in the same breath with the HHS budget or the Labor Department budget or the VA’s budget?” Norton said. “Don’t dare compare us to your appropriations. I understand the resentment on my side to what is being done here, but carry out your resentment without putting us in a position of a thing.”
Republicans, for their part, expressed — perhaps even feigned — shock that Democrats would vote against the bill.
“I can’t believe the gentleman would oppose this bill,” said Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky. “This is a clean-funding mechanism, nearly identical to what was included in the initial clean continuing resolution.
“This funding is solely local and does not come out of the federal covers. they will fund critical district programs, law enforcement, safety, the schools and other essential municipal activities. I can’t believe that I’m hearing opposition to that from that side of the aisle or any side of any aisle,” Rogers said.
But Democrats continued to insist the issue wasn’t over funding D.C.
“This debate is heartbreaking to me,” said Norton, maintaining that Republicans were playing politics with D.C. “This is a living, breathing city.”
No comments:
Post a Comment