History rewritten or something......
By Susan Duclos
Bloomberg reported along their “Breaking News” scroll on their website “Syria Gov’t Said to Shell Damascus Area With Gas,” and then it just disappeared like it never was, but a Twitter user,@dragonfire1024, took a screen shot of the cache version of the page before it too disappeared.
.jpg)
Not seeing a date on the Bloomberg cache, but seeing one on @dragonfire1024′s tweet, sent me searching Google and I found a MarketWatch report, dated September 6, 2013.
Just in case that too disappears, the screen shot of that, with the date, is below.
There is also a video of a supposed victim of the gas attack that happened, then didn’t, which was uploaded to YouTube on Sptember 6, 2013. In case that too disappears, I have downloaded it and will reupload if necessary.
Quite coincidental as Barack Obama cannot get any support, is about to be humiliated in Congress by being denied authorization and approval to attack Syria, that suddenly the Syrian “leadership” would be reported to have conducted another gas attack.
If this was to be a false flag, did someone jump the gun with the reports and the video? Did someone with a single brain cell left in the Obama entourage figure out that the timing would immediately become suspicious and try to have it all erased?
What is going on???
[UPDATE] After multiple reports on Twitter claiming a gas attack, casualties that Assad did it, and so on, a senior strategist at NPR, Andy Carvin tweets, Initial reports of some type of chem attack in Qaboun appear to be a false alarm. Consider this NOT CONFIRMED until more is known. #syria”
That still does not explain the video below, nor the details on it, unless perhaps the rebels thought to “create” a problem once they saw that Obama might not attack the Syrian leadership.
Obama Wrong About Support for Britain During WWII
BY:
President Barack Obama incorrectly asserted that assisting the British when London was bombed by Nazi Germany was deeply unpopular with the United States public.
Obama attempted to draw parallels between the Battle of Britain and the current crisis in Syria Friday at his G20 press conference.
“I’m not drawing an analogy to World War II, other than to say when London was getting bombed, it was profoundly unpopular both in Congress and around the country to help the British,” he said. “It doesn’t mean it wasn’t the right thing to do. Just means people, you know, are struggling with jobs and bills to pay and they don’t want their sons or daughters put in harm’s way. These entanglements far away are dangerous and different.”
Public polling form the time period contradicts Obama’s statement.
A Gallup poll in 1940, when the German bombing campaign in Britain took place, showed 60 percent of Americans felt it was more important to help England win, even at risk of going to war, than to stay out.
Additionally, 68 percent of Americans believed the future safety of the United States depended on England winning the war, and 85 percent felt England would lose if Americans stopped sending war materials to help.
In March 1941, Congress passed the Lend-Lease Act, which empowered the president to lend, lease or exchange war materials with countries whose entanglements were considered crucial to national security.
In contrast, a recent Washington Post-ABC poll shows 59 percent of Americans oppose launching missile strikes against the Syrian government.
Someone set off a false flag prematurely in Syria ?
9/6/13 Syria Gas Attack Reported, Then Deleted- Update- False Alarm? (Video)
Friday, September 6, 2013 15:39
Bloomberg reported along their “Breaking News” scroll on their website “Syria Gov’t Said to Shell Damascus Area With Gas,” and then it just disappeared like it never was, but a Twitter user,@dragonfire1024, took a screen shot of the cache version of the page before it too disappeared.
Not seeing a date on the Bloomberg cache, but seeing one on @dragonfire1024′s tweet, sent me searching Google and I found a MarketWatch report, dated September 6, 2013.
Just in case that too disappears, the screen shot of that, with the date, is below.
There is also a video of a supposed victim of the gas attack that happened, then didn’t, which was uploaded to YouTube on Sptember 6, 2013. In case that too disappears, I have downloaded it and will reupload if necessary.
Quite coincidental as Barack Obama cannot get any support, is about to be humiliated in Congress by being denied authorization and approval to attack Syria, that suddenly the Syrian “leadership” would be reported to have conducted another gas attack.
If this was to be a false flag, did someone jump the gun with the reports and the video? Did someone with a single brain cell left in the Obama entourage figure out that the timing would immediately become suspicious and try to have it all erased?
What is going on???
[UPDATE] After multiple reports on Twitter claiming a gas attack, casualties that Assad did it, and so on, a senior strategist at NPR, Andy Carvin tweets, Initial reports of some type of chem attack in Qaboun appear to be a false alarm. Consider this NOT CONFIRMED until more is known. #syria”
That still does not explain the video below, nor the details on it, unless perhaps the rebels thought to “create” a problem once they saw that Obama might not attack the Syrian leadership.
McCain gets schooled at a town hall....
Powerful plea from this woman and the whole thing must be heard.
Tin or truth ? Who knows but we know hot bizarro things have become - and the desperation for a new War has the Psychopaths getting anxious.....
Sen Graham Warns of Nuke Strike After Missing Warheads Report
Senator warns South Carolina is nuclear bomb target following Infowars report on black ops nuke transfer
Alex Jones & Anthony Gucciardi
Infowars.com
September 5, 2013
Infowars.com
September 5, 2013
Senator Lindsay Graham has warned South Carolinians about the threat of a ‘terrorist nuclear attack’ on the same day our exclusive high level military intel revealed to us that nuclear warheads were being shipped to South Carolina from a major Texas air force base under an ‘off the record’ black ops transfer.
Found in the CBS report entitled ‘Graham: Nukes In Hands Of Terrorists Could Result In Bomb Coming To Charleston Harbor’, the report details Graham’s warning that a lack of military action in Syria could result in a nuclear ‘bombing’ in Charleston, South Carolina — the very destination of the black ops nuclear transfer. The CBS report reads:
“He [Graham] says if there is no U.S. response [to Syria], Iran will not believe America’s resolve to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Graham also says those nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists could result in a bomb coming to Charleston Harbor.”
Graham is quite literally saying that if we do not launch a war with Syria, South Carolina may be nuked. And this ultimately reeks of yet another false flag being orchestrated by the United States government in order to send us into war, or at the very least a threat. Except this time, we’re talking about nuclear weapons. Amazingly, we were the first to get intel on this from our credible and extremely high level military source, who told us the following:
“Dyess is beginning to move out nuclear war heads today. I got a tap from DERMO earlier. He said it was the first time they have been even acknowledged since being put there in the 80′s. No signature was required for transfer… There was no directive. He said that Dyess Commander was on site to give authority to release. No one knew where they were going really, but the truck driver said to take them to South Carolina and another pick up will take them from there.”
This was sent to us before the Graham report came out warning about the nuclear attack on South Carolina, and coincides exactly with what Graham is saying. I am deeply concerned by these findings, and ask everyone to spread the word on this information immediately. Whether or not Graham is receiving intel from higher ups and believes in a legitimate terror attack on the horizon is unknown, but the reality here is that we have intelligence that has linked the unsigned transfer of nuclear warheads to this exact location.
Here is the video report we did on Tuesday regarding the missing nuclear warheads:
Now, we need answers.
The entire event is eerily similar to the unsigned nuke transfer that is now known as the ’2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident’, in which nuclear warheads went ‘missing’ from Minot Air Force Base and Barksdale Air Force Base back in August of 2007. The Minot event, however, was major national news and was even covered by the mainstream media extensively. Disturbingly, however, numerous individuals from the base began dying like flies and committing suicide after the event — and that’s even when it was in the mainstream.
Hopefully, this entire thing will amount to nothing and pass by without any form of ‘terror’ attack. Hopefully the attendee during the speech who told the US News publication that Graham’s speech was‘absolute fear mongering’ is right. Unfortunately, the military source revealing this information is extremely accurate and is absolutely certain that a black ops nuclear transfer did indeed take place. And what’s more concerning is the fact that we have not heard from the source in quite some time.
We are risking our lives bringing you this report on the high level intel and connecting the dots here to what Lindsay is saying. You won’t hear about this in the mega media unless we force them to cover it, and it’s up to us to get this out there. For the first time, we may be able to utilize this high level intelligence to get answers and stop a potential attack.
No comments:
Post a Comment