Wednesday, August 21, 2013

War watch - August 20 , 2013 . Focus on Syria - regional war central , forgotten Libya failed state , Ignored Iraq hellhole , Afghanistan - awaiting Taliban rule once again ! UK not giving up on imposing sanctions against an Iranian bank - despite the British Supreme Court rejecting said sanctions as irrational and unsupported by any evidence !

Syrian rebels going off the reservation again.....

http://news.antiwar.com/2013/08/20/syrian-rebels-threaten-to-attack-un-troops-in-golan/


Syrian Rebels Threaten to Attack UN Troops in Golan

Insists UN Must Prevent Syrian Tanks From Entering DMZ

by Jason Ditz, August 20, 2013
In an open letter to the UN Disengagement Observer Force in the Golan Heights, a Syrian rebel faction has threatened to begin targeting the UNDOF troops if they don’t prevent Syria from deploying military forces into the demilitarized zone.
The zone was set up in May of 1974 after clashes over Israel’s occupation of parts of the Golan Heights. The demilitarized zone was meant to put some distance between Israel and Syrian forces, however, and not to give the rebels an uncontested stranglehold on the region.
Moreover, the rebels have been targeting the UNDOF troops off and on for months already, with multiple kidnappings and several nations pulling out over the danger of the ongoing civil war.
The UN has commented on the latest rebel demands, but in practice its observer force isn’t powerful enough to force Syria’s military out of the zone, and since the incursions have nothing to do with the UNDOF mission of keeping Syria and Israel from fighting, it’s hard to imagine the UN Security Council is going to support the rebel interpretation.

http://news.antiwar.com/2013/08/20/heavy-fighting-as-al-qaeda-attacks-kurdish-villages-in-syria/

Heavy Fighting as al-Qaeda Attacks Kurdish Villages in Syria

Syrian Kurds Continue to Flee Into Neighboring Iraq

by Jason Ditz, August 20, 2013
More heavy fighting was reported today in West Kurdistan, where al-Qaeda fighters attacked three Kurdish villages near the border town of Ras al-Ayn, a vital border crossing the Islamists have repeatedly tried to capture.
The fighters, from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, engaged in fierce battles with Syrian Kurdish faction YPG, which has organized militias around the region, insisting every able-bodied Kurdish man has to resist the Islamist takeover.
As the fighting picks up, yet more Kurdish women and children are crossing the border into Iraqi Kurdistan, where UN officials yesterday estimated that some 30,000 had already fled in just the past few days.
The fight over West Kurdistan has become a sort of war-within-a-war for Syria, as the Kurds had attempted to stay neutral until rebel factions showed up in their oil-rich territory trying to claim it as a “liberated” region under their control.

Libya - for the future of Syria if the West and GCC have its way  ......



Bank of North Africa manager seized by brigade


By Aimen Eljali.

Some of the staff outside the Bank of North Africa today (Photo: Aimen Eljali)
Tripoli, 17 August 2013:
Staff at the head office of the Bank of North Africa in Tripoli’s Dahra district went on strike today after the general manager was seized this morning by brigadesmen saying that he had stolen millions of euros from the bank.
Claiming that the general manager, Ali Zeidi, had been beaten in of them, some 40 staff protested outside the bank, next to the Planning Ministry, insisting that the embezzlement claims were none of the brigade’s business, that they were for the government to investigate.
They accused the brigadesmen of seizing the manager not because they were concerned about dealing with crime, but because they wanted get their hands on the money themselves. It was not the first time this had happened, the staff said, but did not provide details of other instances.
A spokesman for the Interior Ministry said he know nothing about the incident.
Staff at other branches of the North Africa Bank, including Sebha, stopped work and came out in protest at the seizure this afternoon.

EU ambassador’s convoy attacked and escort vehicle robbed


By Nigel Ash

EU ambassador Nataliya Apostolova whose convoy was attacked
Tripoli, 20 August 2013:
The last close support vehicle in a three-car convoy carrying EU Ambassador Nataliya Apostolova, was rammed outside the Corinthia Hotel and its occupants robbed at gun point. When the EU vehicle later tried to leave the scene, the thieves opened fire on it.
The ambassador’s car, which with the lead security escort,  had been ahead of the attacked vehicle, appears not to have been targeted.  Both EU cars left the location at speed.
A formal complaint has been lodged with the Libyan government over the attack, which took place in broad daylight yesterday afternoon, as the ambassador’s convoy left the Corinthia on its way to her residence in Palm City.
An EU source explained that the “soft-skinned” escort vehicle had been hit by another car without plates. “The close protection officer on board got out to speak to the other driver and was threatened with a gun. The men then stole some articles from the car ”, explained the source.
The EU security man re-boarded his vehicle and his driver sought to leave the scene. At this point, several shots were fired at it. There were no injuries to the EU personnel  apart from some bruising sustained by the close protection officer. The damaged white EU vehicle returned to the Corinthia parking area, where guests noted its smashed rear window.
It has been alleged that security staff at the Corinthia garage opposite the attack, had not sought to intervene during the incident. In addition, a police vehicle  had reportedly driven up to the crime scene and, perhaps because the officers inside had seen the robbers’ guns, it had also held back from becoming involved.
The EU ambassador’s own armoured vehicle and its surviving escort continued safely to Palm City.  In recent days there have apparently been concerns that EU vehicles may have been shadowed by unidentifiable vehicles.



Interior Minister Mohamed Al-Sheikh quits after four months


By Ahmed Elumami


Mohamed Al-Sheikh quits after four months
Tripoli, 18 August 2013:
The Interior Minister Mohamed Al-Sheikh resigned today, saying that the Prime Minister Ali Zeidan had withdrawn all powers from him and he could not do his job properly.  Sheikh has been in his job for just four months.
Rami Kaal, the spokesman of the Interior Ministry, told the Libya Herald that the minister had said he had quit because the Prime Minister disrupted all his solutions to activate the police and the interior ministry.
Other sources have indicated that the minister was unhappy with what he described as interference from some some of his deputy ministers.
It has been reported that Sheikh also claimed one of the major reasons he quit was pressure from some Congress members to appoint their relatives to important security positions.
Sheikh said on state TV Al-Wataniya that he was prepared to stay in office until a replacement could be found. However Zeidan accepted his resignation immediately and appointed deputy prime minister Dr. Saddiq Abdulkareem to run the ministry on a temporary basis.
Sheikh was given the interior ministry job after the resignation of  Ashour Shuwail in May, following the passing of the Political Isolation Law.

Libyan Navy warns it will inspect oil tankers


By Houda Mzioudet.
Tripoli, 20 August 2013.
The Libyan navy has announced it is starting patrols to prevent illegal exports of Libyan oil.
In a statement today the Chief of Staff of Libyan Naval Forces warned foreign government, as well as marine companies and shipping agencies that its ships had began sea patrols off the oil ports of Sidra, Ras Lanuf and Brega, following orders from the government and the Libyan Chief of Staff.
According to the Libyan news agency LANA, the navy intends to inspect tankers in the area to ensure all comply with safety procedures and none is shipping Libyan crude oil without proof of a contract from National Oil Corporation, it being the only legitimate body authorised to contract and export Libyan oil.
The Navy statement said it would, in cooperation with the Air Force, warn unauthorised tankers to leave the area. If any refuse, they would be intercepted and escorted to the nearest port.
The naval bases in Tripoli and Benghazi and the Misrata coast guard will  participate with six ships each in the operation.

Most PFG are “asleep in Tripoli” – PFG Spokesperson


By Sami Zaptia.
Tripoli, 20 August 2013
Muftah Alateeri, the spokesperson for Petroleum Facilities Guards (PFG) in the southern region of Libya said that 21,000 had conscripted to the PFG.
However, according to him only 3,000 are actually working, mostly in the south and the east of the country. These are the ones spread across the oilfields in the desert and ports, the PFG spokesperson said.
Moreover, according to Alateeri, speaking to Alaseema TV today,  the balance of 18,000 PFG members are “asleep in Tripoli under air-conditions and or at the Brega compound in Airport Road and at the Zawyia refinery” as opposed to out in the desert oilfields and strategic oil ports in eastern Libya.
The subject of the Petroleum Facilities Guards (PFG) has been a very controversial one over the last few months, coming to a head in recent days as members of the PFG have been openly accused by the Oil Minister Arusi and Prime Minister Zeidan of participating in armed industrial actions at oil installations – as opposed to protecting them.
Over the last few weeks almost all of Libya’s oil ports have been shut down by armed strikes, reducing Libya’s oil exports to such a trickle (30%) to the extent that Libya had to declare a force majeure yesterday with regards to its inability to deliver orders for the month of September.
In June PFG members clashed in Tripoli ostensibly over unpaid wages, but some analysts suspect it was a straight forward turf war over who should get to guard which oil facility – and collect the handsome payment for such duties.
The government and GNC at the end July had appointed a new head to the PFG after his predecessor had resigned – an issue that led to some more expressions of discontent by PFG members who favoured the outgoing head.
However, despite appointing Staff Brigadier Rasheed Mohammed Saleh Alsabri, the authorities have struggled to get the PFG to fully acquiesce to its authority.





Egypt........



http://www.juancole.com/2013/08/leftovers-released-brotherhood.html

(  Ironic for sure.....)

Egypt’s Revenge of the Leftovers: Mubarak to be released, Muslim Brotherhood leader Badie Arrested

Posted on 08/20/2013 by Juan Cole
Too much could easily be made of the pending release from prison of former Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak, who is still facing charges of complicity in killing some 900 young protesters during the Jan. 25, 2011, uprising. The courts couldn’t find evidence tying him to corruption (which either means that Mubarak’s accountants hid their trail with world-beating efficiency or else that the courts took a very, very narrow view of what corruption might be).
Ironically, it was another deposed president, Muhammad Morsi, who ordered that Mubarak be retried. Mubarak had been found guilty of responsibility for the demonstrators’ deaths, but Morsi apparently wanted a more robust verdict. But allowing a retrial means that Mubarak-era judges could well reverse his conviction. The reasoning of the judgment against Mubarak was rather tortured, since the judges simply reasoned that as dictator, if Mubarak had wanted to stop the killing of demonstrators, he could have– but they admitted they found no evidence that Mubarak issued an order that people should be killed.
Another irony: Morsi himself will likely be charged with ordering protesters killed in early December, 2012, when he had declared himself above the law and determined to push through a fundamentalist constitution. Outraged left-liberal youth movements massed in front of the presidential palace. On December 6 in particular, a Muslim Brotherhood paramilitary is accused of killing several peaceful youth demonstrators, and it is alleged in many quarters in Egypt that Morsi ordered the crackdown.
So, Mubarak could get off, while Morsi could be convicted on similar charges of ordering deaths of protesters.
Another irony: The current military junta has already killed more protesters than either Mubarak or Morsi did (Morsi likely had hundreds killed over several months). But its leaders, who have begun speaking of banning public protests and have actually prohibited sit-ins, and some of whom have threatened a policy of using live ammunition against Muslim Brotherhood demonstrators, won’t be charged with anything at all unless there is yet another coup or revolution.
On Monday, Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide was arrested in Nasr Cityafter local residents spotted him and called police. He is being charged with having Brotherhood cadres kill demonstrators in front of the Brotherhood HQ in the Muqattam Hills in Cairo. Since Badie is viewed by anti-Muslim Brotherhood critics as Morsi’s puppet-master, he may well be charged with Morsi’s alleged crimes, as well. Also arrested is Hassan Malek, the Brotherhood’s money man, a huge entrepreneur who is said to have helped fund Muslim fundamentalist movements around the world. Now that the Brotherhood is being redefined in Egypt as a terrorist organization (which is ridiculous), all fundamentalist movements are likely to get the same treatment, and funding them will be coded as terrorism.
Secularists tempted to cheer these developments because they appear to weaken a powerful fundamentalist movement like the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood should pause to consider the methods and rhetoric that are being used. Neither bodes well for civil liberties in the Middle East in the coming decade, and the backlash from the religious right, which could well be pushed into actual, not just rhetorical, terrorism, could be extremely destabilizing.

http://news.antiwar.com/2013/08/20/white-house-denies-cutting-off-egypt-juntas-aid/
( Does anyone in DC know how to play the game ? ) 

White House Denies Cutting Off Egypt Junta’s Aid

Junta PM Warns Move Would Be a 'Bad Sign'

by Jason Ditz, August 20, 2013
New polls released this week show a solid majority of Americans opposed to continuing military aid to the Egyptian junta after last week’s massacres, but the White House is denying reports that they are close to doing so.
Officials insist President Obama and others are engaged in an ongoing “review” of Egypt since last month’s coup, but have offered only tepid criticism of the military’s massacres, and spoken in generally supportive terms about the takeover in general.
Egypt junta Prime Minister Hazem Beblawi warned the US against doing so, insisting it would be a “very bad sign” for US ties with the nation’s military. He added that Egypt was more than capable of finding a replacement for aid, noting that Egypt had long been getting Soviet backing before the US started throwing money at them instead.
Saudi Arabia has already said that it is prepared to “replace” any lost aid to Egypt’s military caused by Western opposition to their brutality, and Israel has promised to use its diplomatic connections to lobby on behalf of the junta, insisting that the stability brought by military rule trumps concerns about the human rights violations they are committing.


http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/08/20/why-obama-cant-withhold-military-aid-from-egypt/


Why Obama Can’t Withhold Military Aid From Egypt

110210-operation-bright-star-egypt-430p.grid-6x2
U.S. military hardware piloted by the Egyptian Air Force on routine patrol
The coverage of the bloodshed in Egypt elides one crucial element regarding the role of the United States in the tragic mess: Plenty of stateside businesses are making money off the mayhem.
Lockheed Martin. Raytheon. General Dynamics. Anyone familiar with the American military-industrial complex knows the big players in the game. What’s less known is that these companies don’t profit only by keeping America stocked with obsolete Cold-War-era weaponry. They also reach across borders to keep the United States locked into relationships that further fatten their bottom lines. Egypt is a prime example.
Trapped
Despite the August 15 announcement of U.S. withdrawal from joint military exercises, and whispers about aid “reprogramming” from Congress, the prospect of serious and immediate reductions in military aid to Egypt are slim.
Egypt’s value as a geopolitical asset—control over the Suez Canal, playing nice with Israel, its leadership role within the Arab world—dictates that the tanks must keep rolling and American influence must be maintained, even as the body counts grow. But the Pentagon’s largesse doesn’t come solely from its desire for influence and access in the world’s most important energy-producing region— however much that may weigh on the minds of policy-makers.
No, there are more simple motives at work: greed and job security. Not news, but the details deserve a closer look, starting with the numbers.
By the Numbers 
- Percentage of Egyptian weapons procurement budget paid for by the U.S.: 80%
- Percentage of total US foreign military aid that went to Egypt in 2011: 25%  (to Israel: 60%)
- Tax dollars Egypt receives in International Military Education and Training (IMET): $1.9 Million
- Tax dollars going to weapons manufacturers yearly since 1987 to arm Egypt: about $1.3 Billion
But that’s not all. Egypt can sign multi-year contracts with American defense contractors that go well beyond the $1.3 billion figure Congress appropriates outright. These deals are based on the assumption that Congress will continue the appropriation, year after year. The U.S. has already signed more than $8.5 billion worth of contracts between Egypt and American defense manufacturers— $2.2 billion more than Congress actually approved.
egypt-us-army-tanks-abramsThe most lucrative deal of them all: U.S.-Egyptian coproduction of a battle tank, the Abrams M1A1.
Initial cost: $1.329 billion (Pentagon contract figures are routinely highballed to Congress so as to secure funding well beyond the cost of the final product. In this case, the DoD press release announces the 1.3 contract but chances are the final cost will be lower.).
Chief recipients: General Dynamics of Sterling Heights, Michigan; Honeywell International Incorporated of Phoenix, Arizona; and Allison Transmission Motors in Indianapolis.
Details: In 1988, the US entered a deal in which a percentage of the tank’s components would be shipped to Egypt for assembly.  The remainder came prepackaged from American defense manufacturers. In 2011, the latest increment in the co-production program was finalized and the number of tanks built under it rose to 1,130.
More and more deals.  For the years 2009-2010, the Institute for Southern Studies lists 37 separate deals between the DoD and American defense contractors related to Egypt. These include deals for weapons, communication devices, logistical support, computer hardware/software, and in-country equipment repair—all bought and paid for by the Pentagon.
Provider companies include not only weapons-makers, like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman, but also household brands that Americans would recognize from television commercials, like Goodrich, Caterpillar, OshKosh, Michelin and US Motor Works.
One deal on that list stands out in particular.  In 2010, Lockheed Martin and the Egyptian military reached an agreement for the purchase of 20 F-16 fighter jets valued at $213 million. Just how did the Egyptian military get such a deal?
Enter the Lobbyist.
In 2007, the government of Egypt hired a handful of Beltway power brokers with thick Rolodexes. Chief among these was Tony Podesta, president of the Podesta Group and brother of Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff John Podesta.
Egypt also sought out former representative Bob Livingston (R-LA) of the Livingston Group and former representative Toby Moffett (D-Conn), chairman of the Moffett Group. With Tony Podesta, the three formed a joint venture known as the PLM lobbying group in October 2007. By 2009, all three had registered with the Department of Justice (DOJ) as foreign-agent lobbyists for Egypt.
The agreement resulted in payment of $1.1 million per year to facilitate American corporate and government contacts with the Egyptian government.
By 2010, the PLM group had facilitated at least 279 contacts on military issues.According to ProPublica, the bulk of these deals occurred when PLM “accompanied delegations of Egyptian military officers to meet members of Congress, administration officials and representatives from defense contractors.”
As it turns out, PLM had cash to gain on both sides of the deal. Among the Podesta Group’s clients at the time were
BAE Systems, General Dynamics, and Lockheed Martin. The Livingston Group hawked Raytheon’s wares. This is all in addition to the healthy roster of lobbyists each contractor maintains in-house.
The Stranglehold
23146369_BG1Members of Congress have a substantial incentive to keep the appropriations flowing, no matter what bloodshed occurs:  If they were to abrogate those deals, the government would be liable for civil suits from weapons makers demanding compensation for lost profits.
More important, we have this stark fact: American defense contractors provide much of what is left of America’s manufacturing base.  General Dynamics and its subcontractors alone have 107 employees in Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, manufacturing kits of tank parts that are to be shipped to Egypt for assembly. If the program were ever cut, that’s 107 people out of work—plus family, friends, loved ones, local retailers and a whole host of other pissed-off voters in those districts, which are not-so-coincidentally presidential swing states.
If Congress cut off the flow of money, blue-collar jobs would be lost in districts across the country. And defense behemoths would think twice before sending a big fat check to key committee members come re-election time.
In other words, big business interests dictate that the aid can’t end, even if policymakers, stricken with moral qualms, wanted it to. And they have plenty of reasons to try and stop—starting with the image problems associated with Egyptian civilians being slaughtered by soldiers wielding weapons that might as well be stamped “Made in USA.”
Don’t expect the big media to cover anytime soon these lucrative Stateside business deals that facilitate bloodshed and anti-American sentiment in Egypt. After all, if big advertisers like Boeing and McDonnell Douglas get offended, they might pull some of those ads you see on cable channels night after night.
And here’s one news flash you surely won’t see on an upcoming Meet the Press:  General Electric– owner of NBC and its news divisions– was just awarded a $14 million contract to service eighteen F110 fighter jet engines for the Egyptian Air Force.







Iraq death dealing Tuesday......


Southern Iraq Bombed: 62 Killed, 146 Wounded Across Country
by , August 20, 2013
At least 62 people were killed and 148 more were wounded. Meanwhile, controversial raids on predominantly Sunni region continued.
Despite continuing accusations from Sunni politicians that current security operations are not necessarily targeting terrorists, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has sworn to continue them. In today’s raids in the Hamrin Mountainsseven suspects were killed and 116 others were captured. Altogether, though, at least 207 were detained in several provinces.
In Amara, a car bomb killed four people and wounded about 56 others.
A bomb near a power plant in Nasariya left three dead and 21 wounded. A second bomb in town left one dead and five wounded.
Six people were killed and 15 more were wounded in a double bombing inIskandariya.
A bomb at a café north of Baghdad exploded, killing five people and wounding 15 more.
In Baqubafive people were killed and 10 more were wounded at a café. Eight more were killed in other attacks.
One person was killed and four more were wounded in a blast near a restaurant inSamarra.
In Garmathree civilians were wounded in a blast. Gunmen killed a civilian and wounded three family members on a road near the city.
In Mosul, gunmen killed a police colonel on his way home. Two other policemen were gunned down as well. Security forces killed two gunmen planting a bomb. A civilian was killed in a sticky bomb blast. At least two more policemen were killed.
Nine insurgents were killed and four more were wounded in an apparent retaliatory blast near Rashad.
Soldiers raiding an abandoned home in Amiriyat al-Falluja triggered a booby-trap bomb, killing three of them and wounding two more.
policeman and a civilian were wounded during a shooting in Falluja.
Two policemen were wounded in a blast in Jalawla.
A bomb in Dhi Qar province wounded five people.


Afghanistan ...... Wizard of Karzai set to resume talks with Yanks , A-Rod does not have any comments....

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/20/us-afghanistan-security-deal-talks



US-Afghanistan security deal talks could resume soon

Appointment of new negotiating team to thrash out deal raises hopes that talks suspended in June might soon restart

Hamid Karzia
Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai, who has appointed a high-profile negotiating team. Photograph: S Sabawoon/EPA
Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai, has lined up a high-profile negotiating team to thrash out a critical long-term security deal with the US, raising hopes that talks suspended in June might restart soon.
The national security adviser, Rangin Dadfar Spanta, and former finance minister Dr Ashraf Ghani will represent the Afghan government in negotiations on the bilateral security agreement whenever they start again, said Aimal Faizi, a spokesman for Karzai.
In a further glimmer of hope for diplomats, Faizi said that while Karzai had not yet decided to restart talks, a national convention to approve a final draft could be held within two months, suggesting he is considering authorising a new round of negotiations.
The bilateral security agreement will provide a framework for American soldiers to stay on in Afghanistan after the Nato combat mission ends next year.
The troops will not be fighting on the ground but they are expected to train Afghan forces and provide vital support in areas where the national army is weak, from intelligence to air power. Without them the Afghan army and police will probably struggle to hold off the Taliban.
If there is no deal, billions of dollars of promised aid to pay salaries for the large Afghan security forces and develop the fragile economy are also unlikely to be paid to Kabul.
On the other side of the table in talks will be the US ambassador to Kabul, James Cunningham, and the top US and Nato commander in Afghanistan, General Joseph Dunford. They already know both Spanta and Ghani, who has a track record of success in difficult talks and helped secure a long-awaited deal for the handover of Bagram prison from US authorities.
Karzai suspended talks with the US after the Taliban opened an office in Doha that looked like the embassy of a government in exile, complete with flag and nameplate – a move, he argued, that violated US promises about how the political office would work.
While the impasse has remained unresolved, an informal late October deadline set by the US is approaching fast.
Karzai said a resumption of talks would depend on the peace process being entirely Afghan but has offered little clarity over how he might determine that.
His spokesman declined to be drawn on whether Karzai might be willing to announce a resumption of talks, saying the government was in no hurry.
"That date [for resuming talks] is up to the president," said Faizi, the spokesman. "Its a very important document, so we don't want to make blunders and mistakes … We are not in a hurry, better to have a good document, or the US can sign one with the next government."
But Faizi also said that a loya jirga – a traditional gathering of delegates from around the country, which Karzai has promised will be convened to approve any deal – may happen this autumn.
"If everything goes well we could have a loya jirga in a month and a half," Faizi said. The gatherings usually take at least a month to organise, raising hopes of fast progress.
The working draft was hammered out by up to 15 working groups, headed by the ambassador to Washington on the Afghan side and the deputy special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan on the US side.
With that document in place, negotiations are set to move up a notch. The complex working draft is believed to be more than two-dozen pages long. And there are still multiple sticking points.
"This will be a stage of political bargaining," said Faizy, adding that the main obstacle from the Afghan government's perspective was US reluctance to provide "assurances about strengthening the Afghan economy and security forces", or a guarantee of protection from "foreign aggression".
With an election looming in April 2014 and a deal needed in time for the US to arrange the removal of people and equipment, Dunford has said the deal is vital.
The US embassy did not respond to requests for comment.









Iran sanctions watch - UK version of irrational actions.....


Britain Seeks to Renew Iran Sanctions After Supreme Court Rejection

Judges: No Evidence Iranian Bank Had Anything to Do With Nuclear Program

by Jason Ditz, August 20, 2013
The British government says it is planning to find a new way to impose sanctions on Bank Mellat, a private Iranian bank, after the British Supreme Court ruled the sanctions “irrational” and ordered them cancelled.
The Supreme Court ruled that the government had no evidence to back up its claims that Bank Mellat was somehow helping with the Iranian nuclear program. Having gotten the sanctions removed, the bank is also seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.
The British treasury officials responsible for the failed sanctions are now hoping to convince the European Union to overrule the British courts and allow them to reimpose the sanctions.
That might not fare any better, however, as the European General Court has already killed a similar sanction impose EU-wide, likewise concerned that there was no actual evidence behind any of the allegations.
http://www.rferl.org/content/iran-bank-mellat-sues-uk/25080023.html


Iran's Bank Mellat Seeks Compensation From Britain

London banned Bank Mellat's operations in Britain and froze its assets in 2009.
London banned Bank Mellat's operations in Britain and froze its assets in 2009.
TEXT SIZE 
By RFE/RL's Radio Farda
Iran's biggest private bank is reportedly seeking 500 million pounds ($780 million) from Britain's Treasury.

The claim comes after Britain's Supreme Court ruled in June that sanctions should not have been imposed on Bank Mellat over its alleged links to Iran's nuclear weapons program.

London banned Mellat's operations in Britain and froze its assets in 2009.

The measure was expanded to the rest of the European Union the following year.

A lawyer for Mellat, Sarosh Zaiwalla, told RFE/RL that the bank was making an estimated annual profit of 250 million pounds ($340 million) in Europe, "so the 500 million [pounds] is a conservative [estimate of the bank's] losses."

A spokesman for the British Treasury was quoted as saying it had not received any claim and would "robustly" contest any demand for compensation.


Time for the US and rest of Iran nuclear talk team ( especially Europe ) to behave rationally ? 

Iran Hints Nuclear Talks Could Include New Official



06.08.2013 19:08‘Talks not threats’: Iran to watch US actions rather than words on nuclear negotiations
... about Iran’s nuclear activities.” She added that the six nations negotiating with Iran “stand ready to continue talks to ...





No comments:

Post a Comment