Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Is the White House and Administration Orwellian , inept , bold face liars , idiots thinking we're idiots , cracking up around the edges under the pressure .... ...... All of the above ?

Is the pressure of recent mishaps , geopolitical stress fractures throughout the Middle East , the global

NSA ongoing clusterfuck causing folks  in the Administration and in particular , the white house to

lose it , to be kind ?







http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/wp/2013/08/09/obama-putins-a-sloucher/



During Friday’s news conference, President Obama described Russian President Vladmir Putin as having a “slouch…looking like that bored schoolboy in the back of the classroom.”
Perhaps the president was trying to infer something about Putin’s intentions or public posturing based on his — well, actual posture. Something about Putin seems to invite scrutiny of his physiology by U.S. presidents trying to divine his inner workings (remember how former President George W. Bush looked into his eyes and saw his tender soul?).
But we couldn’t find much photographic evidence of Putin slouching. In fact, it looks like his carriage is pretty upstanding. See here:
Dmitry Astakhov / AFP/Getty Images
(Dmitry Astakhov / AFP/Getty Images)












http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obamas-surprise-revelation-sealed-benghazi-indictment/story?id=19920474


President Obama surprised aides when he revealed today the existence of a sealed indictment in the Benghazi, Libya, attack, leaving some wondering if he crossed a legal line.
At a press conference at the White House, President Obama was asked whether justice would come to those responsible for the terrorist attack nearly a year ago in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador.
"[W]e have informed, I think, the public that there's a sealed indictment," the president responded. "It's sealed for a reason. But we are intent on capturing those who carried out this attack, and we're going to stay on it until we get them."
That marked the only official confirmation so far of a sealed indictment in the Benghazi case. For days, officials across the law enforcement and intelligence communities have refused to publicly confirm reports of a sealed indictment.
After all, according to federal law, "no person may disclose [a sealed] indictment's existence," and a "knowing violation … may be punished as a contempt of court." Contempt of court carries a maximum sentence of six months in jail.
A U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, called the president's disclosure "crazy."
"Doesn't the law apply to the president too?" the official asked, and then jokingly added, "I guess he could pardon himself."
In fact, though, the president is effectively immune from breaking the law when it comes to a sealed indictment, according to a former prosecutor in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section
"The [president], by virtue of his position, can't violate any non-disclosure/confidentiality rule," said Peter Zeidenberg, now in private practice in Washington. "One of the perks of being the head of the executive branch: Nothing he says is technically a leak. If he does it, it is authorized."
******










http://sitrep.globalsecurity.org/articles/130806915-exploding-clothes-the-latest-w.htm


Exploding clothes: The latest whoopie cushion from our anonymous security experts
Our anonymous perps in the national security megaplex just won't go away. They keep trying to convince everyone al Qaeda withstood the hiding it took from the US over the last decade. So this weekend we got the old and tired buzzword, "chatter," again. Plus, the revival of al Qaeda's alleged ability to make bombs of anything, In this case, wait for it, exploding clothes.


Be skeptical. The US has much bigger problems than terrorism.




There are growing concerns that an al Qaeda affiliate could use a new generation of liquid explosive, currently undetectable, in a potential attack, according to two senior U.S. government officials briefed on the terror threat that has prompted the closing of nearly two dozen U.S. embassies.


Though the Transportation Security Administration has long been concerned about liquid explosives being used in potential devices -- as it was during the failed Christmas Day bombing in 2009 -- the new tactic allows terrorists to dip ordinary clothing into the liquid to make the clothes themselves into explosives once dry.


"It's ingenious," one of the officials said.


What's ingenious is how easy it is for anonymous sources to plant the most ridiculous claims without any substantial explanation except their say-so.

Yes, now they're going to make bombs out of shirts and trousers by dipping them in a magical cocktail of chemicals. The reason for this kind of horseshit passed off as intelligence is that people will say anything for job security.

File this as even worse than the underwear bomb, which only burned its wearer. And the mythology of the bombs sewn into body cavities, aka "the Joker bomb," which somehow doesn't painfully and totally debilitate or immediately poison the carrier.

If you read the article, al Qaeda seems to have been hurt not at all. Always pushing the boundaries of nature and science, inventing new chemical syntheses, from the sandy wastes of Yemen, we're surprised they haven't yet managed to make a secret mixture of water and dirt into a weapon of mass destruction.









http://twitchy.com/2013/08/07/obama-sends-mccain-graham-to-egypt-to-represent-congress-but-not-his-administration/




U.S. State Dept spox says Dep. Sec. Burns is (was) only White House envoy in , not McCain & Graham, who went at Obama's behest

No comments:

Post a Comment