Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Did the White House support of Egypt President Morsi , deposed today by Egypt's military , stem back to the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood within the White House ? Even more fascinating , is there a connection between the Muslim Brotherhood and Benghazi as some have opined exists ? Let's examine the connection between the Muslim Brotherhood , the White House and Benghazi ..... Let's agree that the White House has displayed intriguingly blind support of the sinking ship known as the Muslim Brotherhood. The question is why ?

Congrats to the people of Egypt - the voices of the people have been heard. To the extent that President Morsi failed to heed the voices of the people demanding that he govern equitably and not as the Dictator he believed that he was , then shame on him......

What is fascinating to ponder though is why did the US go to the mat to try to save Morsi - even threatening to put Egypt's foreign aid in question unless Morsi was retained ? Kind of a head scratcher at first glance , just Obama being politically tone deaf once again  , right ? Obama on the wrong side of history again , right ? Or just odd ......Well , maybe not as odd  as we make think - consider the following ....

http://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2013/07/01/the-muslim-brotherhoods-connection-to-benghazi-n1631660/page/full


Kevin McCullough
Recommend this article 
On Wednesday June 26, 2013 reports began to pop up across the Arabic world citing an internal Libyan government memo that has not yet been acknowledged in the American press.

The memo is pictured here:

*Photo Courtesy of Raymond Ibrahim
Multiple sources have confirmed this document details several confessions of the six Egyptians in Libyan custody for the 9.11.12 bombing of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.
The document details the involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood and Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi as being involved with and in the funding, support, planning, and execution of the attack.
What is unique about this document is that its content wasn't leaked to the press in some sort of salacious move. This is simply an interdepartmental memo from the Libyan National Security offices in Tripoli to the Ministry of the Interior. Written solely as a perfunctory after-action report as the results of the Libyan investigation in the events of that night.
It was prepared by Mahmoud Ibrahim Sharif, the Director of National Security of Libya.
In his report Sharif conveys that the Libyan investigation unearthed an Egyptian (terror) cell that had been involved in the planning and execution of the attack. Six confessions from those arrested at the scene--all of them Egyptian--and all connected to the U.S. terror watch listed group Ansar al-Sharia.
Concerning the most important claim of the Libyan memo, Raymond Ibrahim, (an American research librarian, translator, and author, whose focus is Arabic history, language, and current events) indicates that "during interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi cell members 'confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi...'"
The investigation also seems to have unearthed a video taken the night of the attack in which members of the jihadists identify themselves as being sent personally by "Dr. Morsi."
If in fact Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi was even remotely involved, tacitly aware, or even seen giving nodding approval, why on earth did President Obama turn around and deliver 16 fighter jets and 200 tanks to the Egyptian regime roughly three months later?
Why was Morsi invited to the White House in September 2012? Then invited for December 5, 2012? Then February 2013, then March? Why does his visit get continually postponed as though the White House seems to know something about him and his visit that they are not comfortable with?
Why was the President so thoroughly unreachable when the attack took place, and for a period of six to eight hours, incapable of accounting for where he was as the worst of it played out?
Why did Hillary Clinton give her support to the Brotherhood's pet project at the United Nations--to declare blasphemy of Islam a global crime?
Why did the Obama White House and the National Security Council meet with and host a Muslim Brotherhood radical on June 13, 2013? (Who is the personal assistant to a terrorist so extreme his presence is not even allowed in the U.S.?) And only confess to it when it finally is reported by the press?
And why does the current administration have as many as a half dozen mid to upper level appointees that have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood--either directly or through Brotherhood member organizations?
If you thought the answer the White House gave us on the IRS targeting of conservative groups was lame, wait till we get answers to these questions!
This document was merely a finding of the internal investigation of the Libyan investigators the Libyan internal authorities, but its findings should be printed on the front page of the New York Times.
The very sad reality of this Libyan memo, may be something too harsh for the average American to grasp.
Is it possible that something even more sinister was playing out on the night of 9.11.12, and the rationale for all the lies about the incendiary video, and Dr. Susan Rice, and the changing of the story during a Presidential debate, was in fact to keep us from having the bigger story told?
Was Egypt part of the intentional set-up with the out-of-the-blue protest at the American embassy initiated by the Morsi government to help give the Obama administration the cover for the narrative about "the video?"
There is no doubt that when Obama had the choice to assist Hosni Mubarak--who while far from perfect--kept a tight leash on the extremist elements under his rule, chose instead to push Mubarak aside in favor of the Brotherhood's Mohamed Morsi.
And the questions persist... "why?"
Another question that also now rises: “Will the White House press corps do its job and press for answers on Egyptian involvement in 09.11.12?”
Will Congressional committees re-evaluate aid to Egypt in light of this finding? Will ANYONE in Washington take a step to do what is right, to make amends to a slain ambassador's family, the families of two Navy Seals, and a retired Airman who all lost their lives trying to serve the country they believed in?
There are a lot of questions to be answered just from the revelation of this report.
Does anyone care to do what is necessary for justice in light of it?

and more on the subject....

http://godfatherpolitics.com/11566/could-obama-morsi-have-conspired-on-benghazi/


Could Obama, Morsi Have Conspired on Benghazi?


Members of the foreign press may have peeled back yet another layer of the coverup in the Benghazi, Libya, attack on September 11, 2012.
The Kuwaiti paper Al Rai reported, in a story picked up by several major Arabic papers, that a Libyan intelligence report implicates Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and other Egyptian leaders in funding the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.
The report prepared by Mahmoud Ibrahim Sharif, director of national security for Libya, cites confessions from terrorists arrested at the scene of the attack that killed four Americans, including an ambassador and two SEALs.
It says, “among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi; preacher Safwat Hegazi; Saudi businessman Mansour Kadasa, owner of the satellite station Al-Nas; Egyptian Sheik Muhammad Hassan; former presidential candidate, Hazim Salih Abu Ismail."
There are no details available about how the confessions were obtained or if the prisoners confessed under duress. However, a video purportedly taken at the scene in Benghazi shows a jihadist saying in an Egyptian Arabic dialect, "Mahadesh, mahadesh yermi, Dr. Morsi ba`atna," which means, "Don’t shoot, don’t shoot, Dr. Morsi sent us," according to FrontPage Mag.
Egyptian media have asked why Morsi's name was mentioned in the video, but the Egyptian government has not offered an answer.
An Egyptian government connection might suggest an explanation why the U.S. embassy in Cairo was attacked on the same day as the mission in Benghazi and why Egypt would not allow U.S. officials to interview suspects it had in custody.
The attack in Cairo, during which the American flag was torn down and replaced with an al-Qaeda flag, was initially reported by the Obama Administration to have been the result of protests over an unknown anti-Islam YouTube movie. The Administration also tried to link the Benghazi attack to the same video.
The video excuse was a blatant lie, although the Administration and President Obama kept peddling it for several weeks.
The attack in Cairo, in fact, had been advertised in advance in Egyptian media as a demonstration for the release of Omar Abdel-Rahman, the "blind sheik," who is serving a life sentence in the U.S. for his role in planning the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. His son, Abdallah Abdel Rahman, had publicly said in July 2012 that he would organize such a protest at the Cairo embassy.
The very day of the demonstration, September 11, CNN interviewed Abdallah Abdel Rahman, who said explicitly that the protests were about freeing his father. A banner calling for the sheik's release is seen in the background of that report as CNN's correspondent walks toward the embassy.
Morsi has made the release of Rahman one of the major issues for his administration, and he had called for Rahman's freedom just a week before the Cairo protests.
Leading up to the attack in Benghazi, a group calling itself the Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades was implicated in a June bombing at the U.S. mission. It also had targeted the convoy of a British ambassador in Benghazi. The same group has been connected to the January seige at the Algerian natural-gas plant that left 38 dead.
Tying all these bits of circumstantial evidence together strongly suggests that Morsi and other Egyptian leaders may have been involved in a plot to kidnap the ambassador in Benghazi so that he could be exchanged for the Blind Sheik's freedom, but that something went wrong, resulting in the ambassador's death and the other deaths during the attack.
Since Benghazi, the Administration's coverup, the firing or reassignment of personnel with knowledge of the attack, the hiding of witnesses and the continued favored treatment of Morsi's government and the Muslim Brotherhood suggest other sinister possibilities.
Although the U.S. media have tried to ignore the Benghazi story, a picture nonetheless has emerged from the work of a few intrepid journalists and from stories in foreign media of an Administration that long before publicly supporting the Syrian "rebels" was using the Benghazi facility to smuggle arms and al-Qaeda-linked fighters to Syria.
That may have been one possible reason for the coverup, because the Administration didn't want the information about its underhanded funding of the Syrian war getting into the New York Times.
But this latest information -- combined with what we know about the high-level refusal to tighten security in Benghazi or to send in troops to stop the attack on the day it happened -- raises more disturbing questions.
We must also be aware of President Obama's global support for the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as the several highly placed officials in his Administration with ties to the Brotherhood, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's right-hand aide Huma Abedin, and we must ask:
Did President Obama give approval or assist in any way with a plot by Egyptian President Morsi to kidnap the U.S. ambassador to use as a bargaining chip to free the Blind Sheik?
It is a bone-chilling question to ask. It's not a question Americans should have to ask, much less answer. But to date, it seems to be one of the most plausible explanations for what happened in Benghazi and why the Administration has so feverishly worked to cover it up.
We must recognize that the idea is based only on circumstantial evidence. There may yet be a simpler, less heart-wrenching explanation. Let's pray there is.





Here is the report we promised (linked at bottom).
While it’s far too early to predict what’s going to happen in the wake of reports that the Egyptian military has suspended the Constitution and ousted Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Mursi, Americans have an additional reason to cheer for Mursi’s ouster. Evidence that both Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government and Mursi himself were involved in the attacks on the U.S. Special Mission Compound (SMC) and C.I.A. Annex is becoming rather incontrovertible.
As we reported, evidence implicating Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government in general, President Mohammed Mursi in particular, in the Benghazi attacks on 9/11/12 is corroborated by a Libyan Intelligence document and a cell phone video. However, as we further analyzed the document, we found that it aligned with other reporting we had done soon after the attacks.
In particular, the selection of the Innocence of Muslims video as a source of outrage for Egyptians was a very calculated and premeditated effort. We reported about this in the days and weeks after 9/11/12 but additional information gleaned from the Libyan Intelligence document corroborates our findings and even further implicates Mursi and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood in the attacks.
This additional information made it necessary for us to include additional findings that fit perfectly. Instead of writing an entirely new report, we thought it best to incorporate these findings into our June 30th report and present it as an entirely new report. We did not add these findings as an addendum. Instead we inserted them into the existing report without deleting anymore information.
The report that used to be entitled, Hostage Crisis: The Blind Sheikh, Benghazi and Smoking Guns…
…has just become the far more comprehensive report entitled, IRONCLAD: EGYPT INVOLVED IN BENGHAZI ATTACKS
As the future of Egypt hangs in the balance, the evidence against Mursi and the Muslim Brotherhood in the Benghazi attacks is astonishingly conclusive.



Well , that was interesting - wonder if its true that the Muslim Brotherhood has any connections to the White House .......








No comments:

Post a Comment