Will New Pakistani Government Ban US Drone Strikes in Light of Court Ruling? (Ross)
Posted on 05/12/2013 by Juan Cole
It looks as though the Pakistan Muslim League (N), led by steel magnate Nawaz Sharif, is going to be the single largest party in Parliament, after Saturday’s landmark elections. It is the first time that Pakistan has seen a regular peaceful, hand-off of power from one civilian government to another. Imran Khan’s Justice Movement has about 40 seats, perhaps more than the former ruling party, the Pakistan People’s Party. This result represents a shift of power to the urban middle and business classes and youth away from the ‘feudal’ or landlord-based politics characteristic of the leading trend in the Pakistan People’s Party.
Former cricketer Imran Khan could end up a power broker in the new government, giving Sharif his majority. Khan wants stronger protections for women and minorities and an end to US drone strikes in the Northwest,from whence he originally hails (and where his party did very well). This outcome raises the question of whether the new government will insist that the US cease droning Pakistani territory, especially given that the Pakistani courts have now ruled the drones illegal. Wikileaks indicates that the PPP government gave the US implicit permission to use the drone strikes, despite public protestations to the contrary. Will this issue be the first to roil US-Pakistani relations?
On the court ruling, Alice K. Ross writes at the Bureau of Investigative Journalism:
Lawyer Shahzad Akbar said the judgment offered ‘justice’ to drone victims (Photo: Chris Woods)
In the first major Pakistani court ruling on the legality of the CIA’s drone campaign in the country, a Peshawar High Court judge said this morning that strikes are ‘criminal offences’. Chief Justice Dost Muhammad Khan ordered Pakistan’s government to ‘use force if need be’ to end drone attacks in the country’s tribal regions.He ruled that US drone strikes in Pakistan constitute a ‘war crime’ and are a ‘blatant violation of basic human rights’, killing hundreds of civilians. He ordered the government to ‘forcefully’ convey to the US that it must end drone strikes and called on the UN Security Council to intervene.The Pakistani government should also gather data on those affected by drone strikes, and offer redress to the victims, Khan added. At present the only data systematically released on drone strikes comes from independent monitoring organisations such as the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which has been investigating drone strikes and tracking reported casualties since 2011.The ruling comes two days ahead of national elections marking Pakistan’s first-ever transition from one civilian administration to another. The new government will have to decide between implementing the court’s orders or appealing to the Supreme Court.The judgment applies to a lengthy case against the CIA brought by the Foundation for Fundamental Rights on behalf of Noor Khan, a tribesman whose father was among dozens of civilians killed in a drone strike on a gathering of tribal elders on March 17 2011. Last year, Noor Khan also attempted to bring legal action against the UK government for providing information that could lead to deaths in drone strikes, in a case backed by legal charity Reprieve. The attempt was refused but he is appealing.Lawyer Shahzad Akbar, who argued the Peshawar case, said: ‘It is a landmark judgment: drone victims in Waziristan will now get some justice after a long wait. This ruling will also prove to be a test for the new government as if drones continue and government fails to act, it will run the risk of contempt of court.’In the course of the Peshawar case, Dost Muhammad Khan alsoclarified that drone strikes were illegal even if – as has been rumoured – senior Pakistani officials secretly consent to strikes.He also repeatedly demanded that the secretariat for the tribal regions releases any casualty data it holds.Naureen Shah, an academic at Columbia Law School and co-author of several studies on drones, said the ruling increases the pressure on the US to respond to claims of civilian deaths in drones strikes.‘The US government can’t afford to be silent on civilian deaths any more,’ she said. ‘The Peshawar High Court says that drone strikes are carried out “at random” and kill hundreds of civilians. That’s a damning charge that may be overstated. The US government must answer it with investigations and public disclosure about who is being killed and on what legal basis. If the US does not respond, it risks the appearance of indifference – to human life, and to the rule of law.’
(from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism
http://news.antiwar.com/2013/05/10/pakistans-election-three-way-race-could-come-down-to-the-wire/
Pakistan’s Election: Three Way Race Could Come Down to the Wire
Whoever Wins Is Expected to Radically Change Policy Toward US
by Jason Ditz, May 10, 2013
It is Saturday morning in Pakistan, and voters are heading to the polls for an historic election, while analysts are left wondering where it will all end up, since myriad polls have predicted several possible outcomes.
Security is a big factor in the election, and voter turnout is expected to play a significant role in who wins and who loses. Pakistan’s Army has taken control of “highly sensitive” polling sites across Karachi, a city which has seen a lot of political violence.
In the end though, it is really a three-man race, with the other parties only likely to play a role as a minority partner in a government led by one of them. The ruling Pakistani Peoples Party (PPP) is still seen having an outside shot, despite the huge unpopularity of President Zardari and its lack of any real leader during the campaign.
Pakistani Tehreek-e Insaf (PTI) leader Imran Khan is looking to transform his usually minor party into a huge force, though a freak accident in which he broke three vertebrae during a campaign stop has kept him off the trail the past few days. The sympathy vote could help him, though it is believed he will need a big turnout to win.
Which leaves many to believe the “smart money” in this election is on Nawaz Sharif, the head of the Pakistani Muslim League-N (PML-N) and a former prime minister, who saw his last term in office ended with a coup d’etat by Gen. Pervez Musharraf.
Both Sharif and Khan have made it clear they will dramatically rethink national policy toward the US if they are elected, and while the PPP hasn’t been as blunt, it seems certain that if they do stumble into reelection they are going to see the liability of perceived pro-US leanings as costing them a bigger majority.
and.....
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/11/302960/blast-kills-top-afghan-intel-official/
Provincial governor's spokesman, Mohammad Zahir Bahand, said the attack took place at around noon on Saturday in the Waygal district as Mohammad Faiz was leaving home to go to his workplace.
Faiz was rushed to a local hospital, where he succumbed to his grave injuries after an hour and was pronounced dead.
Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said members of his militant group carried out the blast.
Nuristan is among the most volatile provinces in eastern Afghanistan, where militants are openly operating in its various districts.
The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan as part of Washington’s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but the country is still gripped by insecurity.
In late April, the Taliban announced the start of their annual "spring offensive" against US-led and Afghan forces, vowing a new wave of attacks across Afghanistan.
The militant group said it would use "every possible tactic" to inflict casualties on Afghan and US-led forces. They specifically mentioned insider attacks, and bomb attacks.
The announcement prompted the Afghan authorities to beef up security in major cities across the country, including the capital city of Kabul.
According to a recent independent report, Taliban attacks are already up nearly 50 percent compared to this time last year. The United Nations says civilian casualties are 30 percent higher than this time last year.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/11/302960/blast-kills-top-afghan-intel-official/
Blast kills senior intelligence official in eastern Afghanistan
An Afghan policeman inspects wreckage of a car hit by a bomb attack. (File photo)
Sat May 11, 2013 2:26PM GMT
0
The deputy intelligence chief of Afghanistan’s Nuristan province has been killed when an explosive device went off in his residence, Press TV reports.
Provincial governor's spokesman, Mohammad Zahir Bahand, said the attack took place at around noon on Saturday in the Waygal district as Mohammad Faiz was leaving home to go to his workplace.
Faiz was rushed to a local hospital, where he succumbed to his grave injuries after an hour and was pronounced dead.
Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said members of his militant group carried out the blast.
Nuristan is among the most volatile provinces in eastern Afghanistan, where militants are openly operating in its various districts.
The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan as part of Washington’s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but the country is still gripped by insecurity.
In late April, the Taliban announced the start of their annual "spring offensive" against US-led and Afghan forces, vowing a new wave of attacks across Afghanistan.
The militant group said it would use "every possible tactic" to inflict casualties on Afghan and US-led forces. They specifically mentioned insider attacks, and bomb attacks.
The announcement prompted the Afghan authorities to beef up security in major cities across the country, including the capital city of Kabul.
According to a recent independent report, Taliban attacks are already up nearly 50 percent compared to this time last year. The United Nations says civilian casualties are 30 percent higher than this time last year.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/05/blast-kills-top-afghan-intel-official-2644156.html
Blast kills top Afghan intel. official
Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:43
An Afghan policeman inspects wreckage of a car hit by a bomb attack. (File photo)
The deputy intelligence chief of Afghanistan™s Nuristan province has been killed when an explosive device went off in his residence, Press TV reports.
Provincial governor’s spokesman, Mohammad Zahir Bahand, said the attack took place at around noon on Saturday in the Waygal district as Mohammad Faiz was leaving home to go to his workplace.
Faiz was rushed to a local hospital, where he succumbed to his grave injuries after an hour and was pronounced dead.
Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said members of his militant group carried out the blast.
Nuristan is among the most volatile provinces in eastern Afghanistan, where militants are openly operating in its various districts.
The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan as part of Washington™s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but the country is still gripped by insecurity.
In late April, the Taliban announced the start of their annual “spring offensive” against US-led and Afghan forces, vowing a new wave of attacks across Afghanistan.
The militant group said it would use “every possible tactic” to inflict casualties on Afghan and US-led forces. They specifically mentioned insider attacks, and bomb attacks.
The announcement prompted the Afghan authorities to beef up security in major cities across the country, including the capital city of Kabul.
According to a recent independent report, Taliban attacks are already up nearly 50 percent compared to this time last year. The United Nations says civilian casualties are 30 percent higher than this time last year.
AZA/MP/SS
Provincial governor’s spokesman, Mohammad Zahir Bahand, said the attack took place at around noon on Saturday in the Waygal district as Mohammad Faiz was leaving home to go to his workplace.
Faiz was rushed to a local hospital, where he succumbed to his grave injuries after an hour and was pronounced dead.
Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said members of his militant group carried out the blast.
Nuristan is among the most volatile provinces in eastern Afghanistan, where militants are openly operating in its various districts.
The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan as part of Washington™s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but the country is still gripped by insecurity.
In late April, the Taliban announced the start of their annual “spring offensive” against US-led and Afghan forces, vowing a new wave of attacks across Afghanistan.
The militant group said it would use “every possible tactic” to inflict casualties on Afghan and US-led forces. They specifically mentioned insider attacks, and bomb attacks.
The announcement prompted the Afghan authorities to beef up security in major cities across the country, including the capital city of Kabul.
According to a recent independent report, Taliban attacks are already up nearly 50 percent compared to this time last year. The United Nations says civilian casualties are 30 percent higher than this time last year.
AZA/MP/SS
This article originally appeared on : Press TV
Syria related news.......
( fwiw ..... )
Was Syria 'nuked'?
File photo shows damage caused by an Israeli airstrike near Damascus on May 5, 2013.
Fri May 10, 2013 10:30AM GMT
33
By Gordon Duff
Striking evidence of the use of American EPW (Earth Penetrating Weapons) nuclear weapons in Syria has come to light. Experts say the proof is irrefutable.
Dramatic video footage from Syria has revealed startling evidence that counters Israel’s claims of “surgical strikes” on weapons headed to Lebanon.
What were said to be air strikes is now proven to have actually been artillery, something easily discernible to even an untrained observer.
What happens next is shocking. While artillery shells rain down on Syrian army positions, mobile Israeli artillery in direct support and even accompanying rebel forces inside Syria, a huge explosion occurs.
After analysis, it had become clear, Syria had come under attack by Israel using, not just nuclear weapons, but an American nuclear bunker buster bomb, one of several supplied to Israel to use against Iran, one of the last acts of the Bush/Cheney administration.
Submitted for analysis, the footage was compared with tests of the 37,000-pound MOB (Massive Ordnance Penetrator), designed by Boeing to be used against Iran’s underground facilities. There was no similarity whatsoever noted between the Syrian “event” and a conventional “bunker buster” including the GBU 57, the largest conventional weapon every to be used.
More Proof
Colonel James Hanke, former Defense Attaché and Liaison between the Pentagon and Netanyahu’s government , reviewed the footage.
He indicated that the GBU 57 is considered too high a risk for use because of its danger to the earth’s crust.
The Syrian/African fault line spreads into Israel. Were it to be subjected to this kind of explosive power, the threat of an earthquake doing significant damage in Israel is a reality. The nuclear bunker busters have far less penetrating power and, I am not saying that this was a nuclear device, not until more evidence is in, but the ‘event profile’ shows striking similarities.
The other problem with the GBU 57 is delivery. Only two aircraft are capable of delivering this weapon, the B-52 and B-2 Stealth Bomber. Israel does not have these aircraft.
Collapse of UD Air Force Command Structure, Again
Thus, if a MOP where used, it could have only been delivered by the United States Air Force, an organization reeling from recent disasters within its own ranks after a second lapse in nuclear weapons security in a five-year period was discovered at Minot Air Force Base in South Dakota.
Seventeen officers have been removed, a “house cleaning” of unprecedented scale. Back in 2008, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates ordered a restructuring of America’s nuclear security command after a 2007 incident at Minot.
A B-52 was loaded with thermonuclear weapons and flown off the base, violating 84 separate authorization protocols. The plane was later recovered over 1500 miles away under circumstances that have never been adequately explained. What is also not clear is whether the entire nuclear payload was recovered, complete and intact.
Nuclear Use in Iraq Proven
The most important consideration is whether any command organization, be it Israeli, American or any other, would be willing to use nuclear weapons. There is little question that their use has been advocated by both political and military leaders.
The prohibition has been the ability to conceal their use. Events in Iraq have proven such concealment to have worked effectively and when conclusive proof of nuclear weapons use was offered to the media and world scientific community, it was quickly “contained.”
On December 31, 2010, Dr. James Fetzer interviewed Dr. Chris Busby, a bio-medical studies professor at the University of Ulster, engaged in research on the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) in relation to birth defects in Iraqi children.
What Dr. Busby found was startling:
The interesting thing about the uranium was that we were able to measure the isotopic ratio because we were interested to see whether it was, you know, natural uranium or was it DU, which is what we thought it would be. But in fact it turned out to be slightly enriched uranium [with U-235], so, that is to say, it was manmade enriched uranium.
Now enriched uranium is a material that should only be found in a nuclear power station or inside an atomic bomb. So to find it in the hair of the parents of these children with congenital malformations was really astonishing.
So we then went to look to see how this could be, and to cut a long story short, we concluded from various patents from the US patent office that we received from physicists, that it was quite entirely likely that there was a new secret weapon being used, an anti-personnel weapon of some sort which contained enriched uranium or else generated enriched uranium.
…the alternative - which is sort of science fictional and which is entirely possible - I have to say, which is that they have developed a sort of neutron device which uses enriched uranium as part of its components to generate neutrons. And the way it does this is to dissolve tritium in uranium powder…
What Dr. Busby is describing is an Enhanced Radiation Weapon (ERW) or Neutron Bomb. Other variations in America’s secret nuclear arsenal included Minimal Residual Radiation (MRR) weapons.
Evidence of use of “special weapons” has been found at the scenes of more than one terror attack, Oklahoma City, the World Trade Center (9/11), Bali and several others.
The first hard evidence published by qualified scientists involved Fallujah. However, use of nuclear weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan, is said to be relatively common.
Israel’s Bomb Inventory Scandal
One of the greatest “non-secrets” of recent years involves the placement of Israel’s weapons inventory. In 1986, Israeli nuclear weapons technician, Modechai Vanunu, was kidnapped from Italy and taken to Israel where he has been held for over 25 years. His crime; reporting on Israeli’s secret nuclear program at Dimona.
Cables released by Wikileaks revealed that the United States had, in 2006, allowed Libya to build a new chemical weapons facility. What has not been “Wiki-leaked” is that, when the facility was discovered after the fall of the Gaddafi government, it was found to have been run by the Israeli government.
Since those initial reports, nothing more has been mentioned. It is very likely that this illegal facility, inside Libya, is still in Israeli hands.
In June 2010, the USS Grapple, an American naval vessel with an “unspecified” foreign crew, docked at the port of Poti, in Georgia. Ten Israeli torpedo boats, similar to those that attacked the USS Liberty, escorted it.
The ship’s cargo was bombs, including runway and area denial weapons along with the enhanced version of the BLU 113 “Super Penetrator,” a conventional bunker buster weapon weighting 4700 pounds.
Azerbaijani Ploy
These munitions were then transferred to weapons bunkers at a former Soviet airfield inside Azerbaijan where Israel had managed to sequester a number of attack aircraft.
These planes had flown on to Azerbaijan after taking part in joint operations between the Turkish and Israeli air forces.
After their presence was discovered, we have been told the Israeli planes returned home but there is no evidence that the munitions had been repatriated to either Israel or to the United States, their place of origin.
Conclusion
We know and can prove that advanced nuclear weapons have been used in the United States. We have evidence of their use elsewhere in recent years.
We also know that methodologies to conceal their use and manage press leaks have been very effective and have created a combat environment where the “nuclear option” is always “on the table.”
We also have film and photographs from Syria showing something we have no other explanation for. Would Israel use such weapons? Do they have the means? Do they have a motive? Have they had the opportunity?
Do they have sufficient control of press organizations to encourage this kind of blatant recklessness?
Turkey blast death toll continues to climb |
Local TV reports 40 killed and 100 wounded after car bombs hit Reyhanli in province of Hatay, near Syria border.
Last Modified: 11 May 2013 14:34
|
Two vehicles packed with explosives blew up near the town hall and the post office in Reyhanli [AFP]
|
Two car bombs have hit a Turkish town near the border with Syria, killing 40 people and injuring 100 others, local media have reported. Turkish channel NTV said Saturday’s explosions targeted Reyhanli in the southern Turkish province of Hatay, just a few kilometres from the main border crossing into Syria. Muammer Guler, Turkey's Interior Minister, said a series of blasts had been caused by car bombs. Two vehicles packed with explosives blew up near the town hall and the post office in Reyhanli, Anatolia news agency quoted the minister as saying. The news came as Syrian troops fought rebels in a bid to take back a key supply route linking the centre of the country to Aleppo in the north, a monitoring group said. "Fierce battles raged pitting troops against rebels. Regime troops fought to reopen the road linking Hama to Aleppo," Rami Abdul Rahman, the director for the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, told the AFP news agency. Key supply route Rebels cut off the road, referred to as the Desert Road, on Thursday. The army had been using it as its main supply route to Aleppo province, large swathes of which are under rebels' control. Last March, the army's command had announced "the return of safety and security" to villages located on the road. Saturday's violence comes a day after at least 95 people were killed across Syria, said the Observatory. Among them were 32 civilians, 45 rebels and 18 troops. Meanwhile, Russia said on Saturday there was disagreement over who should represent the opposition in a Syrian peace process. The revelation came only days after Moscow and the United States announced a joint effort to bring government and rebels to an international conference. The dispute bodes ill for a civil war in which more than 70,000 people, mostly civilians, have died, and that has left foreign powers looking increasingly helpless. A senior Kremlin official who attended talks on Friday between President Vladimir Putin and David Cameron, the British prime minister, said it would be impossible to meet a target of holding the conference by the end of May. John Kerry, the US secretary of state, and Sergei Lavrov, his Russian counterpart, tried to free a two-year diplomatic logjam on Tuesday by saying they would seek to organise a conference, ideally this month. The Russian official said there was broad agreement that the situation in Syria was dire. "Beyond that there are very many differences: who can take part in this format, who is legitimate and who is not legitimate," the state-run Itar-Tass agency quoted him as saying, on condition of anonymity. |
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu sets off for the Black Sea town of Sochi early next week for a personal call on President Vladimir Putin. This was confirmed Saturday, May 11 by the Russian president’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who declined to explain the urgency of the unplanned meeting. DEBKAfile’s Moscow sources report that Netanyahu asked to meet Putin without delay for a last-ditch attempt to persuade him to call off the sale to Syria of advanced S-300 anti-aircraft missiles.
Moscow’s decision to sell those weapons to Syria was first revealed by DEBKAfileon May 7.
Our sources now add that the prime minister’s chances of averting the sale are extremely slim. A series of prominent figures have already tried talking the Russian president out of the sale and failed, starting with US Secretary of State John Kerry on May 7, followed Friday May 10 by British premier David Cameron who saw Putin in Sochi and German Foreign Minister Guido Westernwelle who met his Russian opposite number Sergei Lavrov in Warsaw.
They all warned the Russian leader that the delivery of S-300 missiles to Syria would touch off an arms race in Syria and the Middle East with disastrous consequences.
Lavrov told reporters: “Russia is not planning to sell S-300 to Syria. Russia has already sold them a long time ago. It has signed the contracts and is completing deliveries in line with them of equipment which is anti-aircraft technology.”
Rejecting all their arguments, Putin said his government would stand by all its commitments to the Syrian ruler Bashar Assad and defend his regime. After Israel’s air strike against Damascus on May 5, nothing would now stop the S-300 deliveries.
The Russian president, in a phone call he put in to the Israeli premier on May 7 when the latter was visiting Shanghai, warned Israel against any further attacks on Syria.
He later spurned the approaches by Western leaders by stating that Moscow would never permit another US-led NATO air campaign against Assad like the one that overthrew Muammar Qaddafi in Libya in 2011. He added that Russian arms sales to Syria and Iran were Moscow’s response to the large arms packages US Defense Minister Chuck Hagel brought to Israel and US Gulf allies in the last week of April.
The S-300 is designed to shoot down planes and missiles at 200-km ranges.
Israel is concerned that Moscow may decided to send the six S-300 batteries carrying 144 missiles due for Syria along with Russian missile and air defense specialists. They will officially be described as instructors for training Syrian crews in the use of the sophisticated anti-air weapons. But they will also be available for operating the missiles effectively for downing Israeli Air Force planes striking targets in Syria and Lebanon. Israel will be forced to think twice before attacking the S-300 batteries for fear of hitting the Russian officers. Putin is therefore placing a severe constraint on Israel’s operational freedom by spreading an anti-air missile cover over the Syrian, Hizballah and the Iranian Basij forces fighting for Bashar Assad.
Since the chances of dissuading Putin to abandon this strategy are just about nil, the best Netanyahu can hope for by his face-to-face with the Russian president is a limited accord on ground rules for averting an Israeli-Russian military clash in Syria.
US Sending $100mln Aid Package to Syria
RT
May 10, 2013
May 10, 2013
The US has announced that it will provide an additional $100 million in humanitarian aid for Syria, which will bring the total provided aid to $510 million.
US Secretary of State John F. Kerry announced the new aid during his visit to Rome on Thursday, detailing that the funds will be used to support 1.4 million Syrian refugees that have been displaced during the civil war.
Much of the aid will be given to countries that are now home to refugee camps, including Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. Jordan will receive $43 million to support the country’s United Nations humanitarian programs.
While meeting with Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeth in Rome, Kerry detailed that Jordan’s fourth-largest city is a ‘tent city’ made up of Syrian refugees.
“Jordan feels the impact of what is happening more than any other country,” Kerry said. There are about 525,000 Syrian refugees in Jordan, which now make up 10 percent of the country’s population, the foreign minister added, explaining that the numbers are expected to rise to make up 20 to 25 percent of the country’s population by the end of 2013.
“No country can cope with the numbers that are as huge as I described,” he said. Jordan is currently building a new refugee camp at Azraq, and the aid money will be used to provide food, shelter and health programs.
About $32 million in humanitarian aid will also be given to Lebanon, and about $9.5 will go to programs in Turkey. The remaining $16 million will be used to provide Syrians in their own country with basic necessities, including blankets, clothing, healthcare, cash assistance, and hygiene kits, the Associated Press reports, based on interviews with unnamed officials.
- The Obama administration has long maintained its opposition to direct involvement in the Syrian conflict, but has become the number one provider of humanitarian aid in Syria. While Kerry’s announcement focused on this type of assistance, rather than direct intervention, the Obama administration is allegedly considering providing weapons to the Syrian rebels.
This week, Sen. Robert Menendez introduced a bill to directly arm Syrian rebels, writing that “the Assad regime has crossed a red line that forces us to consider all options.”
Earlier this week, Kerry met for more than five hours with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and agreed to push for an international conference on Syria to discuss how to move forward regarding the conflict.
The new humanitarian cash will likely help refugee organizations, but do little to end the fighting between the Assad regime and the rebels.
http://news.antiwar.com/2013/05/10/turkish-pm-syria-used-at-least-200-chemical-weapons/
Turkish PM: Syria Used ‘At Least 200′ Chemical Weapons
Tells US Media That Govt Has Evidence
by Jason Ditz, May 10, 2013
In comment earlier today Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has dramatically escalated accusations against Syria today, claiming that his government had determined Syrian troops have used “at least 200″ chemical weapons over the course of the ongoing civil war.
Erdogan insisted Turkey has “proof” of the allegations and has “the remainders of these missiles” as well as pictures of them. He also claimed Turkish hospitals had treated victims of such attacks.
The claims are a huge step up fromIsrael’s claims of a couple weeks ago, which alleged “up to eight” incidents of chemical weapons use, or the subsequent US version, which claimed only two.
Secretary of State John Kerry seems to be on board for these claims as well though, outlandish though they may be, announcing on Google+ shortly after Erdogan’s announcement that there is “strong evidence” of Assad using chemical weapons.
Iraq news of the day......
http://www.timesofisrael.com/obama-policy-will-lead-region-to-war-warns-ex-iraqi-mp-whos-paid-heavy-price-for-dissent/
‘Obama policy will lead region to war,’ warns ex-Iraqi MP who’s paid heavy price for dissent
Mithal Al-Alusi, whose two sons were killed in a Baghdad
ambush soon after he visited Israel, tells The Times of
Israel he feels betrayed by the superpower which
allowed him to return to his homeland
May 10, 2013, 6:56 pm 10
Mithal Al-Alusi is angry. He is angry with Iran for supporting global terrorism. He is angry with Syrian President Bashar Assad for oppressing and killing his own people. He is angry with his own prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki of Iraq, for colluding with the two.
But most of all, he is angry with US President Barack Obama for allowing this all to happen.
“Obama has handed Iraq over to Iran and said ‘do what you like’,” Alusi, a former Iraqi member of parliament who hails from the tribal Sunni province of al-Anbar in western Iraq, told the Times of Israel in a telephone interview from his home in Erbil, the capital of the autonomous Kurdistan region in northern Iraq.
Ten years after freeing Iraq from the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, the Obama administration has allowed a no less dictatorial regime to emerge, and then handed it over to its avowed enemy Iran, Alusi said.
Hugging the current Iraqi regime, Alusi holds, is the last thing the Obama administration should be doing right now
On March 24, US Secretary of State John Kerry visited Iraq during a tour of the region, expressing “the strong US commitment to Iraq,” a state department message read. The US completed its military withdrawal from Iraq at the end of 2011, but continues to closely cooperate with the predominantly Shiite coalition led by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. As part of the Strategic Framework Agreement, the US will provide nearly $300 million in aid to Iraq in 2013.
“I believe that if Iraq remains inclusive and cohesive, it has the best chance of succeeding,” Kerry said in a statement to the press. But Alusi believes that presently Iraq is nothing of the kind.
“The current regime is dictatorial, uninterested in the law, the constitution, or human rights,” he charged. “Saddam Hussein was a professional murderer and a professional liar. The current regime simply belongs to Iran. Members of the ruling party openly admit working for Iranian intelligence and brag about it.”
Hugging the current Iraqi regime, Alusi holds, is the last thing the Obama administration should be doing right now.
“America is making a big mistake. Its policy will lead our region into war,” he added. “This region must be liberated from corrupt regimes like those in Syria and Iran, but also in [US-allied states] like Bahrain.”
‘I will repeat it, even if these terrorists try to kill me again, peace is the only solution. Peace with Israel is the only solution for Iraq’
Merely speaking to an Israeli publication about these matters could be considered an act of treason by Iraq’s intelligence services, who are likely listening in on the telephone conversation, Alusi said, but added that he would rather die than remain silent.
Indeed, he has paid a high price for speaking truth to power. Alusi’s biography is a microcosm, even if an exaggerated one, of the suffering and displacement borne by many citizens of his war-torn country.
An anti-Baath activist since the mid 1970s, Alusi was forced to flee the Middle East for Germany, where in 2002 he staged a takeover of the Iraqi embassy in protest of Saddam’s human rights abuses. The following year, after the American invasion in March, he was back in Iraq heading the de-Baathification commission responsible of cleansing the administration of Saddam loyalists.
As an outspoken advocate of normalization with Israel, Alusi traveled to Tel Aviv in 2004 to take part in the annual counterterrorism conference at Herzliyah’s Interdisciplinary Center. Upon his return to Iraq, he was stripped of his official positions for violating a law banning Iraqis from traveling to Israel.
On February 8, 2005, gunmen ambushed Alusi’s convoy driving through western Baghdad, killing his two sons Ayman and Jamal and his bodyguard. He had no doubt the attack was a response to his pro-Israel stance.
“I will repeat it, even if these terrorists try to kill me again, peace is the only solution. Peace with Israel is the only solution for Iraq. Peace with everybody, but no peace for the terrorists,” Alusi told AFP that day.
Alusi stood behind those words and traveled to Israel again in September 2008. A supreme court decision three months later saved him from prosecution after a parliamentary majority removed his diplomatic immunity. The court abrogated the Saddam-era law, ruling that it was no longer a crime for Iraqis to travel to Israel.
If the opportunity arose, Alusi would travel to Israel again. With 400,000 Iraqi Jews and their descendants currently living in Israel, Alusi believes that Iraq is well-positioned to serve as a bridge between Israel and the Palestinians.
“Peace will only come about through the will of the people, not through agreements signed by leaders,” he said. “But no peace can emerge with the existence of organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad.”
Iraq and Israel have shared interests in combating the Iranian threat and Islamist terrorism as well. But security coordination, not to mention full diplomatic relations, cannot come about as long as Maliki is in power, he said.
“I’ve never heard of fascists and traitors calling for peace,” he said of his own government. “As long as a militia is in power, there can be no peace.”
Despite his bleak prognosis of the present and his heavy personal loss, Alusi insists he will never leave Iraq. Somehow, he remains optimistic.
“We cannot look back to the past. For the sake of future generations we must look forward. The murderers are united, so we — who support human rights — must remain united as well.”
No comments:
Post a Comment