http://dealbreaker.com/2013/04/kpmg-partner-assured-coconspirator-who-handed-him-bags-of-cash-in-parking-lots-that-insider-trading-wasnt-really-illegal/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/apr/09/kpmg-quits-auditors-herbalife-skechers
( Do we see an Arthur Andersen situation unfold ? Will depend what the SEC does and what KPMG's clients do .... )
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/apr/09/kpmg-quits-auditors-herbalife-skechers
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-09/meet-kpmg-partner-who-leaked-secret-client-data-highest-bidder
KPMG Partner Assured Coconspirator Who Handed Him Bags Of Cash In Parking Lots That Insider Trading Wasn’t Really Illegal
By Matt Levine
I don’t want to give you legal advice, but on the other hand you could be getting it from a worse source. Scott London for instance:
[Insider trader Bryan] Shaw said that in approximately July 2012, he received a notice from Fidelity Brokerage Services that Fidelity was putting a hold on his investment account. Shaw said that he immediately called LONDON and expressed his concern that their insider trading had been discovered. Shaw said that LONDON reassured him that there was no reason for concern, and explained that insider trading was like counting cards at a casino in Las Vegas – if you were caught, they simply ask you to leave because they cannot prove it.
Oops! Six months later the FBI got to Shaw, inducing him to cooperate to save himself, and today they charged London with criminal insider trading.1 It’s tempting to conclude that the moral of this story is “never take legal advice from an accountant,” though realistically it’s more like “never take legal advice from your criminal co-conspirator.”
This case is very weird. I mean the actual case is pretty boring: London, as a KPMG audit partner on a bunch of West Coast accounts, got earnings information before it became public, and then he gave it to Shaw, and then Shaw bought stock and options and made money on it and then literally delivered literal bags filled with literal cash to London to thank him for the tips. After Shaw started cooperating he met with London, wearing a wire, and this happened:
In advance of the meeting, agents from the FBI provided Shaw with $5,000 in cash, which was placed into a manila envelope and then wrapped inside a black paper bag, which was consistent with how Shaw had described his concealing previous cash payments he had made to LONDON.
Oh you put the cash in an envelope inside a bag? They’ll never catch you!
I’ve never understood the psychology of insider trading: Shaw supposedly made about $1.2 million, and paid London $50,000 of it, which I can’t imagine being worth going to jail for. But reading this complaint you get the sense that they got psychic satisfaction out of the drama of it: “ooh, look at us, we’re big-shot insider traders! With our black paper2 bags!” London’s inside information was not exactly full of drama and insight:
Shaw asked LONDON whether he should buy [HLF], and LONDON said that typically the stock price would go up based on the earnings that were going to be released, but that the stock was very volatile so it was hard to know. LONDON again confirmed that the guidance was going to be raised, but said that he would “find out exactly.” …LONDON and Shaw discussed how the stock price for Herbalife had jumped recently when Carl Icahn bought a large block of its stock. Shaw told LONDON, “I wish you would’ve known that he was going to release that and we could’ve made some money.” LONDON responded, “Yeah, that would’ve been nice.”LONDON then referenced rumors that had been spread recently about Herbalife going private, which had been discussed in various news reports. LONDON stated, “That is where you make a ton of money … because, you know, we’ll know that.” LONDON then advised that if that were to take place, “What we oughta do is, when I know that it’s gonna start happening, what you do is you start just buying in small blocks, right, so it doesn’t draw attention and then, you know, then it doesn’t look unusual at all.”
Basically they got together and fantasized about finding a merger to insider trade on. As opposed to their insider trading on Deckers:
Shaw asked LONDON, regarding Deckers stock, if “it could go up a little bit?” LONDON responded, “It could go up a little bit.” LONDON said he was not sure how the stock would respond. Shaw then asked LONDON if he agreed they should “buy a little, if it goes up, then we made a little money.” LONDON responded, “Yeah … I think that’s fine.”
Zzzz. Incidentally: Deckers, huh? Deckers is a public company and a KPMG audit client. Shaw and London insider traded in five stocks, all KPMG audit clients. Two are no longer public – to be fair, they were both bought out and Shaw insider traded before each merger, so, yeah, good work big shots – and two are Herbalife and Skechers, which are now-former KPMG audit clients. That leaves Deckers. Why is KPMG still okay auditing them?
The answer appears to be that while London was the audit partner for Skechers and Herbalife, meaning that he signed their audit opinions with the full faith and credit of KPMG, he was only the “account executive” for Deckers, which means that he basically took Deckers executives out for drinks and was all “hey, so, accounting, huh?” Auditors need to be “independent in fact and appearance” of their audit clients; apparently having a current or former audit partner insider trading in your clients ruins that fact and/or appearance, while having a current or former “account executive” doing so doesn’t. I dunno. If you were Deckers would you be pissed? Would you fire KPMG? If you were Herbalife would you be pissed? Would you demand that KPMG come back? The decision about when KPMG has to resign – and leave Skechers and Herbalife without audited financials and in theoretical danger of delisting – and when it can just get by with an apology, seems pretty metaphysical.
Still the weirdest thing about the case might be that both Shaw and London have released teary public statements confessing to everything and saying how sorry they are. These are people with lawyers. Paid lawyers! Shaw has been cooperating with the FBI since February so I guess he’s got some upside in cooperating to the press, but what is London’s angle? Here’s his lawyer’s take:
“But he just can’t understand why he did it, and it’s hard to understand why he did it,” Mr. Braun said. “It makes no sense. He’s looking back on the years that he did it. It made no sense from a dollar-and-cents point of view; it made no sense in terms of his ethics. He’s not trying to justify it in the slightest.” …“It’s pretty grim,” the lawyer told CNBC. “His life is ruined. He’s 50 years old, he’s lost his career, he’ll probably lose his license, he’s been disgraced, and he may have to do some jail time.3 That’s the best-case scenario. It’s a very grim reminder of the consequences for anyone who wants to leak any insider information.”
Well it’s a useful reminder, too. Some people seem to have been underestimating those consequences.
U.S. v. Scott London – criminal complaint [C.D. Cal.]
SEC Charges Former KPMG Partner and Friend with Insider Trading [SEC]
SEC v. Scott London & Bryan Shaw – civil complaint [SEC]
SEC Charges Former KPMG Partner and Friend with Insider Trading [SEC]
SEC v. Scott London & Bryan Shaw – civil complaint [SEC]
1. And the SEC brought civil insider trading charges against both of them. Shaw seems not to have been charged criminally, because he was cooperating I guess, but he still might be.
2. Are “black paper bags” really a thing?
3. Umm some? As Peter Henning points out, London is on the hook for all of Shaw’s $1.2mm in profits, even though he himself only got about $50k, even though he didn’t know how much Shaw was trading, and even though Shaw himself hasn’t yet been charged. I eyeball that at a little under 2 years.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/apr/09/kpmg-quits-auditors-herbalife-skechers
( Do we see an Arthur Andersen situation unfold ? Will depend what the SEC does and what KPMG's clients do .... )
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/apr/09/kpmg-quits-auditors-herbalife-skechers
KPMG quits as Skechers and Herbalife auditor amid insider trading allegations
Accountancy giant rocked by damaging allegations that one of its senior US partners had leaked confidential information
The global accountancy firm KPMG has been rocked by damaging allegations that one of its senior US partners was involved in insider trading.
KPMG said it had fired a partner in its Los Angeles office after the employee had passed on information about the firm's clients to an individual who profited from the disclosures.
The firm did not identify the clients, but the footwear company Skechers and the controversial nutritional company Herbalife suspended trading in their shares and said KPMG had resigned as their auditors because of the allegations.
Skechers said it had been informed by KPMG that its "lead audit engagement partner" on the Skechers account is "under federal investigation for providing non-public information of his clients to a third party in exchange for money. The third party then used that information to trade stocks of several west coast companies."
Herbalife said: "KPMG stated it had concluded it was not independent because of alleged insider trading in Herbalife's securities by one of KPMG's former partners who, until April 5, 2013, was the KPMG engagement partner on Herbalife's audit."
KPMG has not confirmed the federal investigation, but in a statement on Monday, it said: "Late last week, we were informed that the partner in charge of KPMG's audit practice in our Los Angeles business unit was involved in providing non-public client information to a third party, who then used that information in stock trades involving several west coast companies. The partner was immediately separated from the firm."
The disclosure is a major reputational blow to KPMG. Chicago securities attorney Andrew Stoltmann called on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to charge KPMG over the latest allegations, which he claimed were not an isolated event.
"In 2003, KPMG agreed to pay $125m to settle a lawsuit stemming from the firm's audits of the drug chain Rite Aid. In 2004 KPMG agreed to pay $115m to settle lawsuits stemming from the collapse of software company Lernout and Hauspie Speech Products. In 2005 KPMG admitted to criminal wrongdoing in creating fraudulent tax shelters to help wealthy clients avoid $2.5bn in taxes and agreed to pay $456m in penalties in exchange for a deferred prosecution with federal prosecutors."
Stoltmann said KPMG's "pattern of behaviour" should raise a red flag for regulators. "It appears as though the firm's compliance department missed potential criminal conduct by yet another employee and because of this, at a minimum, the SEC should bring significant civil charges against the company," he said.
US authorities have been cracking down on insider trading recently. Federal prosecutors are still pursuing associates of Raj Rajaratnam, founder of the Galleon hedge fund, now serving 11 years on insider dealing charges.
The allegations were also a blow for Herbalife, which is locked in a bitter fight with hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman, who has called the company "the best managed pyramid scheme in the history of the world".
Ackman has called it his "patriotic duty" to bring down Herbalife, an international multi-level marketing company that sells nutrition, weight-loss and skin-care products. It operates in 88 countries through a network of approximately 2.7m independent distributors.
Last year, Ackman claimed that 1.9 million Herbalife salespeople had failed to make money since the company was founded 32 years ago. Recruits each paid about $2,000 for supplies and training, Ackman calculated, and had collectively lost $3.8bn.
Herbalife chief executive Michael Johnson had his salary cut by 58% in 2012, according to regulatory filings. Johnson, a former Disney executive, was paid $10.3m in 2012, down from $24.6m in 2011.
Rival billionaire investors Carl Icahn and Daniel Loeb have made multimillion-dollar bets that the company will survive and prosper.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-09/meet-kpmg-partner-who-leaked-secret-client-data-highest-bidder
Meet The KPMG Partner Who Allegedly Leaked Secret Client Data To The Highest Bidder
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/09/2013 16:45 -0400
The KMPG partner at the heart of today's Herbalife/KPMG fiasco was unknown for several hours, until finally his name resurfaced. PerReuters: "Scott London, a partner at accounting firm KPMG, was the lead auditor for Skechers USA Inc who resigned after allegedly leaking insider information to traders, said Skechers Chief Financial Officer on Tuesday. In an interview, CFO David Weinberg said he was surprised to learn late on Monday from partners at KPMG that London had admitted to the allegations and was leaving the firm."
And from the WSJ:
KPMG said late Monday that the partner had allegedly provided inside information about its clients to someone who had used that information in stock trading. That person wasn't connected with the battle between Messrs. Ackman and Icahn over Herbalife, said a person familiar with the situation. The recipient of the alleged insider information hasn't been named.KPMG didn't name the partner involved in the allegations, whom it described as in charge of its audit practice in its Los Angeles business unit.KPMG partner Scott London headed the audit of Herbalife for the accounting firm. Mr. London didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Introducing Scott (Via LinkedIn). We are confident the SEC, FBI and the DOJ (long after the fact) will be delighted to make an acquaintance.
Bloomberg's Jon Weil did some more sleuthingand found out that Scott London...
... also has an interesting side gig: Chairman of the Los Angeles Sports Council. The nonprofit describes its mission as "the promotion of spectator sports programs in the Los Angeles and Orange County area, including support of our local teams and the attraction of events to the area."Here's where that connection gets curious. Look on the left-hand column of the sports council'swebsite, under the heading "Supporting Our Local Teams," and you'll see a list of logos and names, including Major League Soccer's Los Angeles Galaxy. And what's the first thing you notice when you click on the Galaxy? Herbalife and its logo are all over the team's website, including across the front of the Galaxy players' jerseys. That's because Herbalife, which sells nutritional supplements, is the team's main sponsor.Yet perhaps there was another reason for investors to wonder about KPMG's independence from Herbalife, or at least the appearance thereof: London is chairman of an organization that, quite literally, is a cheerleader for a professional sports franchise that is inseparable from Herbalife and its brand.
Maybe there was a connection between London and Herbalife after all...
One wonders if following the demise of expert networks in late 2010 as a legitimate source of paid inside information, the hedge fund community realized there is a just as eager, and potentially cheaper source, of insider info on companies they want to buy or sell. And that source just happens to be partners (disgruntled or otherwise), and other staffers at Big 4 accounting firms.
One also wonders just how deep the rabbit hole revealed by Scott will be, and just how many hedge funds are exposed to have generated "alpha" thanks solely to the information provided by Scott and others like him.
We can't wait to find out.
Meet newly confirmed SEC director Mary Jo White’s past clients
Before she was confirmed by the Senate, White was collecting $42,500 per month in retirement pay from the firm, which represents some of America’s most powerful corporations. The company recently converted that into a lump sum payment to White.
The Daily Caller has assembled a list of some of White’s personal clients during her time at the firm.
Former Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis
Former Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis retained White in September 2009, one week prior to announcing his resignation from the bank amid fallout from a messy and controversial takeover of Merrill Lynch. Lewis was under investigation for allegedly concealing $16 billion in Merrill Lynch losses from his shareholders in order to gain approval for the merger.
In January 2010, the SEC announced that it would not file civil charges against Lewis. Shortly thereafter, then-New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo sued Lewis for fraud.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb hired White in 2006 to review the drugmaker’s rejected settlement with Apotex. The disputed settlement, in which Bristol allegedly paid Apotex $40 million to delay its sale of a generic version of a drug for which Bristol held the patent, was blocked by state attorneys general and sparked a criminal antitrust investigation by the Department of Justice. The case was eventually settled in 2012.
Goldman Sachs leaker Rajat Gupta
In 2011, White represented former Goldman Sachs Director Rajat Gupta, who was on trial on federal insider trading charges after he allegedly leaked information from Goldman board meetings to a friendly hedge fund manager. Gupta was convicted in June of last year and sentenced to two years in prison.
JPMorgan Chase
White represented JPMorgan Chase against SEC charges that the company misled investors regarding the delinquency status of mortgage loans. JPMorgan settled with the SEC last November for $296.9 million.
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon recently praised White’s nomination to head the SEC, saying, “she’s extremely capable, competent, bright tough. A perfect choice.”
White has said that she will recuse herself as SEC director from regulating JPMorgan, but only for approximately one year.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/mary-jo-white-sec-chair_n_3040541.html
Mary Jo White, New SEC Chair, May Not Participate In Key Enforcement Decisions In First Year
Wall Street has a new top watchdog, but it isn't clear whether she will be in the room as her agency makes key decisions about whether to pursue some of the financial sector's biggest stars.
Mary Jo White, a former federal prosecutor who has spent the last decade as a lawyer defending banks, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on Monday as the new head of the Securities and Exchange Commission. White pledged not to participate in SEC decisions for one year in matters involving former clients, which include Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley. She also vowed not to return to the New York law firm Debevoise & Plimpton.
Foremost among the tough decisions the SEC will likely have to make in the next year: whether to sue JPMorgan Chase executives, including CEO Jamie Dimon, for false statements as the $6.2 billion "London whale" trading loss unfolded. White represented JPMorgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, from 2010 through 2012 in a range of financial crisis-related cases. Though White hasn't said for sure in what instances a past relationship will prompt her to recuse herself, it seems likely that any high-profile enforcement matter involving the megabank will be made without her input for the next year.
White, a respected former federal prosecutor, takes over an agency with a reputation damaged from its failure to sound warning on risk-taking in advance of the financial crisis, and for failing to catch Ponzi-king Bernard Madoff. The agency has taken some steps to rehabilitate its image, with its enforcement division bringing more cases and winning more big-dollar settlements than ever.
Critics contend that the SEC, the agency that regulates Wall Street, still hasn't done enough to hold accountable those responsible for the housing bubble and economic crash. Though the agency has brought cases that target Wall Street banks, it has largely avoided charging top executives. The SEC is a civil law authority, which means it has the power to sue, but not to bring criminal charges.
In a recent Senate hearing, White promised that "no institution would be too big to charge." She also said she would pursue a "fair but bold and unrelenting" enforcement policy. She said she will step aside when matters involving former law clients come before her.
“I think the public investor should know that I am their advocate,” White said during her confirmation hearing. “If I’m confirmed, the American public will be my client. And I will work as zealously as is possible on behalf of them."
Though it fell short of asserting that any securities laws were broken, a recent report by the Senate Subcommittee on Investigations left little doubt that its authors felt that JPMorgan's top officers failed on the job. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said the London Whale trade was not the action of "rogue traders" and bank "superiors were well aware of their activities."
Though it fell short of asserting that any securities laws were broken, a recent report by the Senate Subcommittee on Investigations left little doubt that its authors felt that JPMorgan's top officers failed on the job. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said the London Whale trade was not the action of "rogue traders" and bank "superiors were well aware of their activities."
White may also have to bench herself during a forthcoming arbitration involving exchange operator NASDAQ and several large banks. The banks, including former White client UBS AG, have argued the stock exchange should be liable for bank losses during Facebook's botched initial public offering.
Other former clients whose actions might come into the SEC’s purview include General Electric, Microsoft, Deutsche Telekom and Verizon. And these are just the clients White has publicly revealed. In her financial disclosures, White mentioned three clients she could not name, citing attorney-client privilege.
It remains to be seen if White would excuse herself from cases involving Deloitte, one of the largest accounting firms in the world. Deloitte, a White client, audited 920 publicly-traded American companies in 2011, according to the company’s latest annual filings. In December, the SEC sued Deloitte’s Chinese unit for obstructing a fraud investigation.