Commentary on the economic , geopolitical and simply fascinating things going on. Served occasionally with a side of snark.
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Benghazi - Gate and Sandy Hook - Have we seen two False Flag ops with sloppy cover up attempts in just the past several months ? Read and decide for yourself ?
The assault left Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans dead. But intelligence officials say U.S. investigators are making very little headway in finding justice.
Ever since an armed mob torched a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, President Obama has vowed to bring the killers of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans to justice. Yet four months after the assault, U.S. counterterrorism and intelligence officials tell The Daily Beast that the hunt for those responsible remains stymied by poor cooperation by North African governments.
A Libyan man walks through the debris of the damaged U.S. ambassador’s residence in the U.S. Consulate compound in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 13, 2012. Inset: Ambassador Christopher Stevens. (Gianluigi Guercia/AFP/Getty; AP)
On Tuesday the Tunisian government released Ali Ani al-Harzi, a leading suspect in the attack, who was taken into custody after fleeing Libya for Turkey and then sent to Tunisia. Officials say Harzi was released over Washington’s objections, as Tunis cited a “lack of evidence.” While the FBI eventually got access to Harzi, efforts to press him on what he knew were often blocked by bureaucratic objections by the Tunisian government and its court system. In December the Tunisian branch of the Islamist militia Ansar al-Sharia posted photos of people they claimed to be FBI agents who interviewed Harzi, according to the counterterrorism website Long War Journal. The U.S. intelligence community believes members of Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi participated in the attack four months ago.
While some U.S. officials feared that Harzi’s release was coming, Tunisian officials did not inform the U.S. government ahead of time.
Meanwhile, in Libya, the landscape isbecoming increasingly lawless. In Benghazi this week, Ahmed Abu Khattala, a militia leader who claimed in an interview with Reuters that he was at the U.S. mission the night of the consulate attack, survived an assassination attempt after a bomb was placed under his car. The device exploded prematurely and instead killed one of Khattala’s assailants. Additionally, the Benghazi police officer investigating the murder of the chief of Benghazi police in November went missing last week.
One source of frustration for U.S. intelligence community: the president’s decision to make the Benghazi probe a criminal investigation. While the CIA has an ever-changing list of suspects it dubs the “Benghazi attack network,” the drones and Special Operations teams that are used to hunt al Qaeda operatives in Pakistan and Yemen are not being used to track down Stevens’s killers. Instead the investigation is being led by the FBI, which relies on cooperation from local and national police in Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt.
Some U.S. intelligence officials stress that counterterrorism investigations take time. In this case, the Benghazi attack is not like other al Qaeda terrorist operations that are planned for months and involve the movement of people, money, and the metadata found on emails or social media. While there was some planning of the Benghazi attack (the State Department’s Accountability Review Board confirmed that someone dressed as a police officer was casing the U.S. mission the morning of the assault), there is little evidence there was a plot similar to the 2001 World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks or the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000.
One source of frustration for U.S. intelligence community: the president’s decision to make the Benghazi probe a criminal investigation.
Harzi is not considered to be a ringleader of the Benghazi-attack network, according to three U.S. intelligence officials who spoke to The Daily Beast on the condition of anonymity. He is, however, considered a suspect, because he used social media to tip off friends about the attack and was later arrested at Istanbul’s airport trying to get to Syria.
According to these officials, Harzi’s brother is believed to be Tariq Abu Ammar, a midlevel planner for al Qaeda’s franchise in Iraq. Today Ammar’s main job is arranging the travel of fighters from North Africa to Syria’s al Qaeda–linked opposition, known as the al-Nusra Front.
The slow pace of the hunt has caught the attention of some lawmakers. Last month Rep. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, told CNN he was “getting reports of people who are in that business that tell us it is going far too slow, and they can’t tell us why it’s so slow.”
From the start, almost everything that we were originally and "officially" told by the Obama Administration about the Benghazigate "event" was false (i.e., a lie) or misleading or inadequate. And now that the sole suspect held in the attack has been released, the cover-up is gaining momentum.
The reportproduced by State's Accountability Review Board (ARB) and released in an unclassified version Dec. 18 (pdf) did little to clear up what was misleading and inadequate in the "official" versions about the happenings during the "event."
The recently-released "Flashing Red: A Special Report On The Terrorist Attack At Benghazi" (pdf) by the Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs is little better.
I write today to: 1) Describe the lies within the contexts of the reports; 2) Reveal the shortcomings of the reports; 3) Discuss the implausibility of the various details of encounters between the intruders, the occupants, and the rescuers; and 4) Examine the pre-"event" operations in Benghazi and the possible reasons the "event" occurred.
Abridged versions of the two reports showing points relevant to this post can be found here and here.
The reason that this serial perfidy should be exposed is that the lies -- along with the misleading and inadequate focus on the pre-"event "security situation in Benghazi, the Mohammed video, and the questions about the lack of support during the "event" -- all distract from the main issues:
(1) The pre-"event" purpose of the compound and its Annex (since these operations probably motivated the perpetrators of the "event"); and
(2) Team Obama's failed policies in North Africa, the Middle East, and Afghanistan.
That is, everything that we are "officially" being told is intended to or serves to provide a cover-up both of the gun-running operation that was run out of the compound and its associated Annex and of the fiascoes in Libya, Egypt, and Syria.
The reports reveal little new information, and that is disappointing but not surprising, for the administration has no intention of ever allowing the truth to be known by the public about the pre-"event" operations in Benghazi, the "event" itself, and the aftermath of the "event." Michael Hirsh sums it best in his review of the ARB report: "A real reckoning of Benghazi will have to await further reports.
Neither report discusses pre-"event" operations in Benghazi, nor do the reports investigate possible motivations for the attack. Instead, both reports dwell at length about the pre-"event' security situation in Benghazi and the absence of military responses during and after the "event."
The ARB report is 39 pages of mush -- some say cover-up -- interspersed with purported facts that pretty much follow the substance of earlier "official" descriptions of the "event." It is ironically headed with the quote by Santayana about the past repeating itself, and that, alone, would be cringe-inducing were it not so risible -- since the authors of the report placed it there with apparent serious intent, and it was "included perhaps to add legitimacy and a veneer of integrity to an investigative report unworthy of such a definition, it is an insult to those aware of" the actual circumstances prior to the "event."
The Senate report offers little new insight, but it does go into more detail on pre-"event" circumstances, the "event" itself, the "Mohammed film" lie, and a few other things -- worth the read only if you have nothing else to do!
Both reports dismiss the first lie -- that the intrusion resulted from spontaneous demonstrations in reaction to a "disgusting and reprehensible" video. The ARB report simply states that "there was no protest prior to the attacks, which were unanticipated in their scale and intensity."
The Senate report goes into a little more insignificant detail in its dismissal of the lie by specifically covering the multiple statements by Mr. Carney, Secretary Clinton, Mr. Obama, and others -- most famously during the U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice's "full Ginsberg" on Sept. 16 -- wherein the administration held to that first lie.
The reports also refute the second lie: The one about the description of the compound, for neither the compound itself nor its main building ever should have been called a "consulate," since neither ever held that formal designation. Furthermore, no "consular" functions were ever carried out in the building or at the compound nor did the American flag ever fly over it.
The ARB report refers to the compound (view overhead here) as the "U.S. Special Mission compound (SMC)," but we do not know if it ever held that formal designation prior to the "event," because "a complete list of All U.S. embassies, consulates, and diplomatic missions worldwide" can be found here, and there is nothing at that link that refers to anything in Benghazi.
... a gated-villa, leased by the US State Department from a local man named Mohammad al-Bishari. The villa in Benghazi was not a US Embassy, diplomatic mission or extension of the embassy. In fact, the nearest US Embassy is Tripoli.
...that the U.S. government mission in Benghazi was "never a consulate," contrary to the incessant claims made in the establishment press. "The unique circumstances surrounding the creation of the mission in Benghazi as a temporary mission outside the realm of permanent diplomatic posts resulted in significant disconnects and support gaps," the report explains, pointing out that the new Libyan regime was not even officially notified about the existence of the compound.
An interesting point is that the Senate report refers to the compound as "Temporary Mission Facility" or simply -- uncapitalized -- as "mission" or "facility."
A third lie unintentionally debunked by the reports was that it was an "attack."
Even though each report uses the term "attack" many times, both make clear that the compound was not actually attacked.
What really happened was that a group of "dozens" of men entered the compound (in the words of the Senate's report -- "a large number of armed people flow[ed] unimpeded") through the front gate, and this entry was accompanied by gunfire and at least one explosion.
None of the compound's inhabitants were ever killed or wounded by the gunfire, and neither the gate nor the wall surrounding the compound nor any of the buildings in the compound were damaged by any of the explosions.
The group used fuel cans stored near a generator to torch a building near the compound's entrance that had been used to house guards and to torch several vehicles parked outside that building (almost all of the photographs and stock footage that are seen in the media are of that building and those vehicles.)
In fact, each and every "official" detail pertaining to the circumstances of the "event" at the compound defies logic -- from the intruders' entry into the compound to the rescuers' return to the Annex -- A series of circumstances that might well be called "The Immaculate Confrontation" since the intruders, the occupants, and the rescuers engaged in firefights for over an hour -- -and nobody got shot!
A long, illustrated discussion of the circumstances of the "event" can be found here, and a collection of images of the compound can be found here.
I have produced below an enhanced and annotated picture of the chart/map that was introduced by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb during her appearance before the House Oversight Committee Hearing on the "Security Failures in Benghazi" on Oct. 10, 2012, and I ask that readers keep it in mind as I proceed to discuss the "official" details of the "event":
I have made countless searches and read countless descriptions of the "event," and I have found that no one -- journalist, blogger, or writer -- has explored or questioned:
How the Blue Mountain guards outside the gate and the armed but poorly skilled Libyan February 17 Martyrs' Brigade militia members inside the gate escaped injury or capture as the firing and exploding began (AP reports that a guard beaten by the intruders has been interviewed, but no details of that interview have surfaced) -- and ARB report said they fled "to points south and east in the compound, towards the Villa B area" but thereafter is silent on all but one them;
How the entry gate escaped damage as the "dozens" of intruders came through it;
Why the intruders did not break into the main building until several minutes after they had entered the compound;
How four of the security agents inside the compound could have escaped injury or capture in several confrontations with a heavily-armed and firing crowd that overwhelmingly outnumbered them;
Why the intruders did not torch or destroy the SUV that was parked near the two secondary buildings during the intruders' assault of those buildings and entry into one of them (the report says the intruders were unable to use empty fuel containers to do this but does not question why no other vandalism was committed on the vehicles);
Why the intruders did not even begin to attempt to break into the main building's secure area;
How the security agents could have escaped injury or capture in several attempts to remove Sean Smith's body and search for Ambassador Stevens' body while confronting a heavily-armed and firing crowd that overwhelmingly outnumbered them:
Why the intruders suddenly withdrew from the compound less than an hour after entering it without, apparently, having achieved any possible objective; and
How CIA agent Tyrone Woods and the other members of his rescue party could have entered the compound through the gate via the single approach from the East (the above-linked AP story said that approach roads were blocked) without encountering and engaging confronting a heavily-armed and firing crowd that overwhelmingly outnumbered them -- a crowd that may or may not have exited through that gate immediately prior to the rescue party's arrival.
Note: The ARB report says the Annex team remained behind whilst the original 5 agents departed, and it describes another immaculate firefight with the returning intruders before the rescue team also leaves through the crowd.
It is extremely unlikely that these questions will ever be answered by anyone in the administration because each of the questions may pertain to the pre-"event" operations in Benghazi and the possible reasons that the "event" occurred.
I have dubbed the pre-"event" operations "Fast and Furious in the Maghreb" and described the operations here and here. The operations were a major part of a gun-running operation (described here) conducted by Team Obama and its various Muslim allies that allowed for the clandestine arming of the rebels in Syria. The reports do not address these operations at all.
The "event" itself was almost certainly directed at those operations in a fashion that will probably never be known, and that fact explains the shortcomings of the various descriptions of the details of the "event" itself.
Doug Hagmann has produced a number of pieces at CFPhere, here, here, and here exploring the operations in Benghazi and on the probable identities and motives of the intruders (some of the conjecture by his contacts approach "black helicopter" territory, but it is well worth the time needed to read them all).
The reports confirm Senator Dianne Feinstein's press conference comments that the "dozens" of intruders came through an open gate, but neither addresses when the gatekeepers and near-by Libyan security personnel left their posts nor do they address if the gatekeepers and security personnel were connected to the intruders or if they joined the intruders or simply absconded.
The major unanswered question arising from the several "official" versions is the "why" question -- Why did the intruders intrude, i.e., what was their motive? It could not just have been to set the "mission" on fire, but that seems to have been all that they did during the "event."
As noted above, the intruders did not initially make the 100-yard charge at Villa C, the compound's main building, where Ambassador Chris Stevens, Information Management Officer (IMO) Sean Smith, and four Diplomatic Security (DS) agents were located. Instead, some of the intruders gathered up containers holding fuel for generators and set fires, and others made a rather leisurely move towards and surround the various buildings within the compound.
Villas C and B were quite large -- perhaps as big as 10,000 sq. ft. and 5,000 sq. ft. respectively -- much larger than the buildings would need to be to house so few people.
And from one piece in another excellent series of articles, Clare Lopez suggested that they were large warehouse-type buildings that probably contained arms collected by the operation. Adm. James A. Lyons writes about the "event" here, and he agrees with Ms. Lopez and thinks that the buildings were probably looted.
These conjectures are interesting, but there is no evidence that the intruders did any looting during the short period of time that they were in the compound. However, they may have made the intrusion in order to search for the things that they thought were in the buildings.
WND's senior reporter and ABC radio host, Aaron Klein, discusses intrusion and motivations here:
The difference between branding the Benghazi facility a "mission" or a "consulate" may be crucial in determining what was really going on in the building [.]... [It] was routinely used by Stevens and others to coordinate with the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari governments on supporting the insurgencies in the Middle East, most prominently the rebels opposing Assad's regime in Syria.
Knowing that the "mission" was being used in "aiding the rebels fighting Assad's regime in Syria" gives rise to a very big unanswered question: Who was behind the operation at the "mission"?
It is highly unlikely that Team Obama wants that question asked, and the ongoing dribbling of information is convenient in preventing its being asked.
State, itself, probably was not running the operation -- just facilitating an operation run either by the CIA, itself, or by some other "agent or agency," possibly illegally absent a Presidential Finding authorizing it.
Think of it as a possible modern-day Iran-Contra affair run by a modern-day John Poindexter (John Batchelor has an interesting discussion here [starting at 19:00] of this possibility -- that there was no finding).
Amb. John Bolton writes about the operations at the compound and Team Obama's failed policies here:
Libya was a centerpiece of supposed success in Obama's foreign policy, not some country of small significance and low threat levels. It is important to establish not only the actual paper trail in this case, but even more importantly why, on such a critical foreign-policy issue, it did not automatically come to Clinton's seventh-floor office.
...Obama will hold office for four more years, and Clinton apparently aspires to succeed him. Their worldview and its policy consequences must not be allowed to escape scrutiny as they did in the just-concluded presidential campaign. Most of the media have certainly shown little interest in exposing administration failures. Clinton's testimony may be the last chance to do so for a long time.
And we must not forget that Hillary promised Tyrone Woods' father that "they were going to 'arrest and prosecute the man that made" the Mohammed video, and Mark Bassely Youssef has been in jail since the 7th of November on a one-year sentence for "probation" violations.
Well, now that Hillary has recovered following her "Immaculate Concussion" and blood clot (the two seem to be medically unrelated) she will purportedly be appearing before Congress.
Let us hope that Sens. Feinstein and Chambliss and Congressmen Issa and Chaffetz ask for and receive answers to some of these and otherquestions.
Note, too, the opinions of key leader of the intruders who remains free today:
As part of his response to a question about the attack on the US consulate, Boukhtala said, "Let's first ask about the reason for their presence in Benghazi in this suspicious and secret way. The other thing is: what is the nature of work they were doing in Benghazi? What was the role that the consulate was playing and who gave it permission to violate Libya's sovereignty and intervene in Libyan politics?"
Indeed!
and just comparing Sandy Hook cover up as an interesting side by side.....
It is a sad day in America as new evidence has come forth showing that everything we were told about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a lie and that, possibly factions, within our own government and mainstream media were complicit in staging the atrocity to possibly strip constitutional rights from American citizens by banning firearms.
Tuesday I was reviewing information sent in by reader tips on the Sandy Hook (Newtown, CT) school shooting.
As I was cross-referencing other reports that we have done, an extremely dark, cold feeling ran down my spine — to me it was confirmed. My original suspicions came all flooding into my mind as more pieces of the puzzle fell into place.
First of all I would like to preface this article by stating that I personally feel that this Newtown, CT shooting case and some details within is one of the hairiest stories if not the most dangerous story we have covered in depth aside from the BP Oil Spill of 2010.
In fact, most of the media and even alternative media are not covering certain aspects of this case which deserve to be highlighted. In my opinion the information about the possible shooters being disguised as nuns is groundbreaking. Please take the time to read this entire essay.
Here is a recap of Ambellas’ report;
Newtown Police: ‘Two Occupants with Ski Masks, One May be Wearing a Nun Outfit’
Note: On December 14, 2012, Shepard Ambellas reported the following;
A caller on the Alex Jones show Friday (the day of the shooting) gave a report from Newtown that he was in a bowling alley before 10 AM (before the shootings took place) signifying that the school population was possibly held artificially low Friday as a possible militarized operation took place.
The caller has also stated that an unverified rumor is circulating amongst the school staff that the shooters were described to be disguised ”organized group of nuns”infiltrated the school property to carry out the shootings leaving at least 26 dead at an elementary school Friday.
Now evidence has come forth that correlates with school staff claims that the shooters were “disguised group of nuns” in a shocking audio capture of Newtown Police operations on the morning of the shooting.
NEWTOWN, CONECTICUT — It has now been verified in an audio clip reviewed bytheintelhub.com that, at the very least, police officers on the day of the shooting believed that there were multiple suspects fleeing the scene in a purple van wearing ski masks and, possibly, nun outfits.
UPDATE: January 9, 2013 — The following police audio (YouTube) has been pulled along with a plethora of other videos (in the last 24 hours) which show in a massive coordinated effort to fool the American people as the Sandy Hook shootings were likely staged.
Take a listen for yourself.
At 1:34:19 into the video,“Two occupants with possible ski masks”.
At 1:35:07 into the video, “One may be wearing a nun outfit, headed toward Danbury and Stoney Hill, purple van”.
Update: Reader submitted actual audio again.
What bothers me most about the fact that the (above) police scanner audio was taken down is the fact that it coincides with several other key, videos, audio, tweets, Facebook posts, and more that have been mysteriously taken down in the last 24 hours. I heard this audio for myself as did many others. The transcript is available above.
After further investigation I have noticed key details of the crime emerge that are just uncanny to say the least. In fact, I don’t even know what to make of it as my brain has been on information overload with all of the other stuff I am busy with right now.
However, this issue is too important to fly under the radar. Bottom line, we need a massive independent investigation into the entire shooting.
On the very day of the shooting, the Chicago Tribune posted the following headline reading simply, “Elementary School Shooting”.
What kind of headline is this? What could this article be about? It sounds more like an optimized search engine term rather than an article headline on a popular mainstream newspapers website. But even more creepy was what the body of the article read and the photo it contained.
Simply;
( Don Emmert, Getty Images / December 14, 2012 )
Two unidentified nuns leave the scene of the aftermath at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. At least 27 people, including 18 children, were killed.
It literally reads “Two unidentified nuns leave the scene…”. However what stands out to me the most is the fact that the nuns look very official. In fact they look so official they even have blatant identification badges.
The nuns also appear to be wearing police or military issue 511 Tactical Shoes in a non-suede finish. We have also had local reader submitted tips saying that no church in the areas nuns wear this type garb, and that the nuns are not indigenous to the area.
To me this signifies a totally staged photo op also posted in conjunction on a major news website to play as a cover if the (militarized) shooters were to be made or identified by authorities or eyewitnesses as the teachers described and as police audio details.
However we are merely scratching the surface of a massive governmental plot to obtain our firearms.
New evidence has surfaced showing that video “memorials” of the Sandy Hook school shooting victims were posted on several CIA ghost accounts over 30 days in advance.
In one case a video was uploaded to private and then the day of the shootings it was released publicly. However, there was just one flaw, the time date stamp was recorded by Vimeo’s system, a Tweet was recorded by Twitter, and a post was found on Facebook all pointing to prior posting of memorials of the Sandy Hook victims.
In fact, some of the CIA contrived footage is so pathetic that it was used by the mainstream media early on indicating full involvement of several factions on many levels.
Yesterday in front of my eyes I witnessed link after link, video after video, being pulled from multiple sites across the web.
The following Twitter user @bacmaster may be involved in some type of operation as he actually Tweeted the video post he did one month or more prior to the school shooting.
The video post was a memorial.
However after I confronted him through my Twitter @NotForSale2NWO yesterday he panicked and deleted the original Tweet itself, which implicated him as an operative with advanced knowledge of the shooting.
The bottom line is there are multiple time date stamps that precede the actual shooting event. This demands an explanation.
Please send all information and tips to tips@theintelhub.com as we will be conducting an open investigation into this matter.
A popular YouTuber reports;
As the YouTuber points out, the only thing that matters now is finding out if there was indeed real victims or if the entire shooting scene was in fact staged.
There are others including a Florida professor who are taking a serious look into this event. Claudine Zap writes;
A media professor at Florida Atlantic University who is questioning the Sandy Hook massacre has caused controversy with his conspiracy claims.
James Tracy, who writes a personal blog about conspiracy theories, believes the events that unfolded at Sandy Hook did not happen as reported.
The professor writes on his blog, Memory Hole, “While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place—at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described.” He suggests that there were multiple shooters and that the number of dead is incorrect. The blog post was published on the Global Research site, where it caught the attention of the Web.
The academic, who is known for his conspiracy theories on 9/11 and the Oklahoma bombing, believes—as he claims on his blog and recently stated on a radio show—that trained “crisis actors” may have been employed by the Obama administration to shape public opinion on gun control.
The 47-year-old, who holds a Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in mass communication, wrote on his blog, “ As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends.”
According to his faculty profile, the professor “teaches courses examining the relationship between commercial and alternative news media and socio-political issues and events.” He also lists his recent work in “Censored 2013: Sourcebook for the Media Revolution. The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012.”
Update: More Posts Before Shooting Located
The following fundraiser on YouCaring.com was posted on December 10, 2012, four days prior to the shooting;
However the CNN page linked from the fundraiser that was posted four days prior to the shooting has an issue as the URL has been altered and the (day) date code is missing thus possibly signifying a covert operation to hide the actual dates posted of the following timeline, which reads like a play-by-play sports report (undated);
Sandy Hook shooting: What happened?
Twenty-six people — 20 students and six adults — were shot and killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14. Details continue to emerge about what precisely happened. Below is a timeline of events that compiles the latest reporting.
Before events at the school
At some point before he went to the school, investigators believe Adam Lanza, 20, killed his mother, Nancy Lanza.
He grabbed three guns from the house — a semi-automatic AR-15 assault rifle made by Bushmaster and pistols made by Glock and Sig Sauer — and went to the elementary school wearing black fatigues and a military vest, according to a law enforcement official.
The above weapons are similar to the ones found with the suspect: A Bushmaster rifle, a Glock handgun, and a Sig-Sauer handgun.
Classes were under way at the school. Approximately 700 students were present.
Earlier this year, the school principal, Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung, ordered a new security system installed that required visitors to be visibly identified and buzzed in. As part of the security system, the school locked its doors each day at 9:30 a.m.
The door was locked when the gunman arrived.
Authorities now know the gunman used “an assault weapon” to “literally (shoot) an entrance into the building,” Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy said.
A graphic depicting the site of the shooting. (CNN)
Inside the school
Hochsprung heard loud pops. She, school psychologist Mary Sherlach and vice principal Natalie Hammond went out to investigate.
Only Hammond returned from the hallway alive. She was wounded.
At about 9:30 a.m., as announcements were read over the loudspeaker to the students, shots were heard across the school. Students described being ushered into bathrooms and closets by teachers after hearing the first shots.
Lanza moved toward two classrooms of kindergartners and first-graders, police said.
In one classroom was Lauren Rousseau, a substitute teacher who was filling in for a teacher out on maternity leave. The gunman shot all 14 students in the classroom, law enforcement officers said.
In another classroom, Victoria Soto, 27, moved her first-grade students away from the door. The gunman burst in and shot her, according to the father of a surviving student. Six students were killed in that classroom.
First responders arrive
At the police station, dispatchers began to take calls from inside the school. Authorities say the first emergency call about the shooting came in at “approximately” 9:30 a.m.
“Sandy Hook school. Caller is indicating she thinks someone is shooting in the building,” a dispatcher told fire and medical personnel, according to 911 tapes.
Police and other first responders arrived on scene about 20 minutes after the first calls.
Police report that no law enforcement officers discharged their weapons at any point.
The gunman took his own life, police said. He took out a handgun and shot himself in a classroom as law enforcement officers approached, officials said.
Twenty students, ages 6 and 7, and six adults were killed at the school.
Police secured the building, ensuring no other shooters were on site. Police then escorted students and faculty out of the building to a nearby firehouse.
As reports of the shooting made their way around town, frantic parents descended on the firehouse where the children had been taken.
By nightfall, the firehouse became a gathering point for parents and family members whose loved ones would never walk out of the school.
Another interesting observation shows Governor Malloy at a press conference. Governor Malloy states in the video, “The Lt. Governor and I have been spoken too in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state”.
Several times in the video the Governor refers to the scenario as playing, like a role play or drill almost.
Governor Malloy, who was referenced in an StanfordPlus.com article stating;
“I’ve asked this group to join Chairman Scott Jackson so they can begin the task of taking a broad, systemic approach in crafting the recommendations that will lead to comprehensive legislative and policy changes that must occur following the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School,” Governor Malloy said. “This includes ensuring that our mental health system can reach those that need its help, looking for ways to make sure our gun laws are as tight as they are reasonable, and making certain that our law enforcement has the tools it needs to protect public safety, particularly in our schools.”
The members are:
Chairman: Scott Jackson – Mayor, Town of Hamden Dr. Adrienne Bentman – Director, Adult Psychiatry Residency Program, Hartford Hospital’s Institute of Living Ron Chivinski – Teacher, Newtown Middle School Robert Ducibella – Founding Principal, DVS Security Consulting and Engineering Terry Edelstein – Nonprofit Liaison to Governor Malloy Kathleen Flaherty – Staff Attorney, Statewide Legal Services of Connecticut, Inc. / Facilitator and State Trainer, National Alliance for Mental Illness in Connecticut Dr. Alice M. Forrester – Executive Director, Clifford W. Beers Guidance Clinic, Inc. Dr. Ezra Griffith – Professor Emeritus of and Senior Research Scientist in Psychiatry, Deputy Chair for Diversity and Organizational Ethics, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University Patricia Keavney-Maruca – Member, State Board of Education / Former technical high school teacher Christopher Lyddy – Outgoing State Representative, 106th Assembly District of Newtown / Program Manager, Trainer & Consultant, Advanced Trauma Solutions, Inc. / Former Program Director, Youth Equipped for Success!, Forensic Health Services, Inc. / Former Clinical Supervisor, Juvenile Risk Reduction Center, Community Solutions, Inc. [Membership effective January 10, 2013] Denis McCarthy – Fire Chief, City of Norwalk Barbara O’Connor – Director of Public Safety and Chief of Police, University of Connecticut Wayne Sandford – Professor, University of New Haven, Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice & Forensic Sciences / Former Deputy Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Emergency Management & Homeland Security / Former Fire Chief, Town of East Haven Dr. David J. Schonfeld – Director, National Center for School Crisis and Bereavement / Professor, University of Cincinnati Department of Pediatrics Dr. Harold I. Schwartz – Chief Psychiatrist, Hartford Hospital’s Institute of Living Bernard R. Sullivan – Former Chief of Police, City of Hartford / Former Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Public Safety / Former Chief of Staff to House Speaker Tom Ritter
Predictive Programing
“Pumped Up Kicks” by Foster the People
Robert’s got a quick hand. He’ll look around the room, he won’t tell you his plan. He’s got a rolled cigarette, hanging out his mouth, he’s a cowboy kid. Yeah, he found a six shooter gun. In his dad’s closet hidden with a box of fun things, and I don’t even know what. But he’s coming for you, yeah he’s coming for you.
[Chorus: x2] All the other kids with the pumped up kicks you better run, better run, outrun my gun. All the other kids with the pumped up kicks you better run, better run, faster than my bullet.
Daddy works a long day.
He’ll be coming home late, he’s coming home late.And he’s bringing me a surprise.
‘Cause dinner’s in the kitchen and it’s packed in ice. I’ve waited for a long time. Yeah the sleight of my hand is now a quick-pull trigger, I reason with my cigarette, And say, “Your hair’s on fire, you must have lost your wits, yeah.”
[Chorus: x2] All the other kids with the pumped up kicks you better run, better run, outrun my gun. All the other kids with the pumped up kicks you better run, better run, faster than my bullet.
[Whistling]
[Chorus: x4] All the other kids with the pumped up kicks you better run, better run, outrun my gun. All the other kids with the pumped up kicks you better run, better run, faster than my bullet.
Another interesting aspect of the case is the unusual nature displayed by the county coroner. His actions and responses are mind boggling.
And FWIW ( Sorcha Faal is definitely a source one must question - however even a stopped clock is right twice a day..... )
Jan 9, 2013
Obama Death Squads Kill Top Gun Activists As New Massacre Fears Rise
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A new Federal Security Forces (FSB) report updating their 4 January “urgent action” memorandum to President Putin circulating in the Kremlin, today, states that the “death squads” unleashed upon America by President Obama have claimed their first two victims and warns that “another massacre” in the United States is “much nearer than first believed.”
As we had previously detailed in our 5 January
report “Obama Death Squads Fan Out Across
America As Rebellion Looms,” Obama,
emboldened by recent US Federal Court rulings
giving him absolute authority to kill anyone he
chooses in secret, and for whatever reason he
deems necessary, dispatched at least 800
VIPER Teams (Visible Intermodal Prevention
and Response Teams) throughout America in a
bid to assassinate and neutralize any and all
opposition to his planned seizure of his citizens
guns.
According to this chilling FSB report, the first two Obama“death squad” victims indentified by Russian intelligence sources were gun rights activists John Noveske [photo 2ndleft] and Keith Ratliff [photo 3rd left], both of whom were hailed as supporters of the US Constitutions Second Amendment which grants Americans the right to bear arms.
Western news sources confirming these assassinations report that Noveske was killed after a mysterious single car accident and that Ratliff was killed by a mysterious single gunshot to his head.
Noveske, this report continues, was the owner of Noveske Rifleworks, one the premier makers of what are called assault-style weapons and equipment in the US and which have been specifically targeted by the Obama regime for confiscation.
Ratliff, this report says, was a business partner at FPSRussia (FPS-First Person Shooter), YouTube’s ninth most popular channel with more than three million active subscribers and a combined half billion views, and sole owner of FPS Industries, which works in customized weaponry and world leader in military technology.
The Obama regimes reason(s) for assassinating two such high profile weapons manufacturers and gun rights activists, this report notes, is based upon the United States successful reign of terror against top scientists, which between the dates of 2004-2012 have seen 119 of some of the worlds leading researchers mysteriously murdered over US government fears of their reporting the truths of what they’ve discovered.
By assassinating Noveske and Ratliff, FSB intelligence analysts in this report say, the Obama regime is sending a “chilling message” to all who oppose their plan to totally disarm the American people that they “will stop at nothing” to see their master plan implemented.
Even worse, this report warns, is “new evidence” coming from the United States that the Obama regime is planning another “mass carnage” type event to occur within the next few weeks to bolster their spurious claim that Americans need to be disarmed.
Following in the wake of the 14 December 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School Massacre, top FSB intelligence social psychologists state in this report, the Obama regime will undoubtedly be able to achieve a critical mass of public opinion advocating for new draconian gun laws that will, in essence, make criminals out of millions of otherwise law abiding American citizens.
Unfortunately for the Obama regime, this report says, and the reason for another “tragic event” needing to happen, is that the “official story” about the Sandy Hook Massacre, like nearly all such events before it, is beginning to break down in the light of critical scrutiny and analysis.
To the American people being allowed to know the truth of these events it appears unlikely as the Obama regime has secured for itself the lapdog services of the powerful American mainstream propaganda media establishment which, to date, continues to spread its venomous lies to an unsuspecting public not really knowing, or even caring, about the abyss they are being led to.
( Don Emmert, Getty Images / December 14, 2012 )
Two unidentified nuns leave the scene of the aftermath at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. At least 27 people, including 18 children, were killed.It literally reads “Two unidentified nuns leave the scene…”. However what stands out to me the most is the fact that the nuns look very official. In fact they look so official they even have blatant identification badges.The nuns also appear to be wearing police or military issue 511 Tactical Shoes in a non-suede finish. We have also had local reader submitted tips saying that no church in the areas nuns wear this type garb, and that the nuns are not indigenous to the area.
To me this signifies a totally staged photo op also posted in conjunction on a major news website to play as a cover if the (militarized) shooters were to be made or identified by authorities or eyewitnesses as the teachers described and as police audio details.However the CNN page linked from the fundraiser that was posted four days prior to the shooting has an issue as the URL has been altered and the (day) date code is missing thus possibly signifying a covert operation to hide the actual dates posted of the following timeline, which reads like a play-by-play sports report (undated);
Sandy Hook shooting: What happened?Twenty-six people — 20 students and six adults — were shot and killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14. Details continue to emerge about what precisely happened. Below is a timeline of events that compiles the latest reporting.Before events at the schoolAt some point before he went to the school, investigators believe Adam Lanza, 20, killed his mother, Nancy Lanza.He grabbed three guns from the house — a semi-automatic AR-15 assault rifle made by Bushmaster and pistols made by Glock and Sig Sauer — and went to the elementary school wearing black fatigues and a military vest, according to a law enforcement official.The above weapons are similar to the ones found with the suspect: A Bushmaster rifle, a Glock handgun, and a Sig-Sauer handgun.Classes were under way at the school. Approximately 700 students were present.Earlier this year, the school principal, Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung, ordered a new security system installed that required visitors to be visibly identified and buzzed in. As part of the security system, the school locked its doors each day at 9:30 a.m.The door was locked when the gunman arrived.Authorities now know the gunman used “an assault weapon” to “literally (shoot) an entrance into the building,” Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy said.A graphic depicting the site of the shooting. (CNN)Inside the schoolHochsprung heard loud pops. She, school psychologist Mary Sherlach and vice principal Natalie Hammond went out to investigate.Only Hammond returned from the hallway alive. She was wounded.At about 9:30 a.m., as announcements were read over the loudspeaker to the students, shots were heard across the school. Students described being ushered into bathrooms and closets by teachers after hearing the first shots.Lanza moved toward two classrooms of kindergartners and first-graders, police said.In one classroom was Lauren Rousseau, a substitute teacher who was filling in for a teacher out on maternity leave. The gunman shot all 14 students in the classroom, law enforcement officers said.In another classroom, Victoria Soto, 27, moved her first-grade students away from the door. The gunman burst in and shot her, according to the father of a surviving student. Six students were killed in that classroom.
No comments:
Post a Comment