http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/28/world/asia/betrayed-while-they-sleep-afghan-police-are-dying-in-numbers.html?_r=0
KABUL, Afghanistan — A wave of betrayal has left at least 17 Afghan policemen dead in the past 10 days — all killed in their sleep, at the hands of those close to them.
Early Thursday morning, an Afghan policeman unlocked the door of the check post where he was stationed in Oruzgan Province and let in his friends from the Taliban, who helped him attack his sleeping colleagues with knives and guns, eventually killing four and wounding eight.
On Sunday, a local police commander in a remote northern province, Jawzjan, shot to death, in their beds, five men under his command and fled to join the Taliban.
And on Dec. 18, a teenager, apparently being kept for sexual purposes by an Afghan border police commander in southern Kandahar Province, drugged the commander and the other 10 policemen at the post to put them to sleep, and then shot them all; eight died.
In the crisis that has risen in the past year over insider killings, in which Afghan security forces turn on their allies, the toll has been even heavier for the Afghans themselves — at least 86 in a count by The New York Times this year, and the full toll is likely to be higher — than it has been for American and other NATO forces, which have lost at least 62 so far, the latest in Kabul on Monday.
Unlike most insider attacks against foreign forces, known as “green on blue” killings, most of the attacks between Afghans, “green on green,” have been clear cases of either infiltration by Taliban insurgents or turncoat attacks. As with the three recent attacks, they have fallen most heavily on police units, and they have followed a familiar pattern: the Taliban either infiltrate someone into a unit, or win over someone already in a unit, who then kills his comrades in their sleep. Frequently, the victims are first poisoned or drugged at dinner.
“I tell my cook not to allow any police officer in the kitchen,” said Taaj Mohammad, a commander of a border police check post near the one in Kandahar that was attacked on Dec. 18. “This kind of incident really creates mistrust among comrades, which is not good. Now we don’t trust anyone, even those who spent years in the post.”
The most recent of the green-on-green betrayals took place on Thursday about 3 a.m., in the town of Tirin Kot, the capital of Oruzgan Province in southern Afghanistan. According to Fareed Ayal, a spokesman for the provincial police chief, a police officer named Hayat Khan, who had been in regular touch with the Taliban for religious guidance, waited until the other officers at his check post fell asleep and then called Taliban fighters by cellphone and let them in. First the attackers stabbed the one officer who was on watch, but he raised the alarm in time to awaken some of the police officers.
In the ensuing firefight, four policemen were killed and eight wounded, while Mr. Khan and his Taliban confederates managed to escape, according to Mr. Ayal’s account.
In the attack on Sunday, in Jawzjan Province, the victims were all part of an Afghan Local Police unit whose commander had previous connections with the Taliban. Such local police units, strongly supported as part of American policy in Afghanistan, undergo training, and community leaders and elders offer guarantees that the units have no further insurgent ties.
Gen. Abdul Aziz Ghairat of the Jawzjan Provincial Police said that the commander who had killed the men in their sleep, Dur Mohammad, had fled but that his relatives and a community elder who vouched for him had been detained and were being interrogated.
In some green-on-green cases, personal grievances may drive the attackers to throw in their lot with the Taliban.
That is apparently what happened in the case of Noor Agha, a young man who the police say killed eight border security police officers in their check post on the border near Spinbaldak, the major crossing point between Kandahar and Pakistan, on Dec. 18.
The police said that Mr. Agha, whose age was unclear but whom police sources described as “still beardless,” had been the involuntary companion of the border police commander at that check post, Agha Amire, for several years. Other police commanders who knew both said there was clearly an “improper relationship” between the two.
While not saying so explicitly, they were suggesting that Mr. Amire was using Mr. Agha in the commonplace practice known as bacha baazi, in which powerful Afghan commanders frequently keep young boys as personal servants, dancers and sex slaves.
The practice was outlawed during Taliban times but has never gone away, and even some provincial governors and other top officials openly keep bacha baazi harems. The practice was noted in the latest United States State Department’s annual human rights report, but the report said “credible statistics were difficult to acquire as the subject was a source of shame.”
The night of the attack, Mr. Agha offered to make a special dinner for the police at the check post and invited two friends to attend. He and his friends put drugs in the food and then shot everyone there, including Mr. Amire, and the three attackers escaped across the border to join Taliban insurgents in Pakistan, according to a police official. Mr. Agha’s family, who lived in Arghandab district, a former Taliban stronghold near Kandahar city, fled their home, leaving behind livestock and personal possessions, according to police officials and relatives of the commander.
Although a police official who spoke on the condition of anonymity put the toll at eight dead and three wounded in that episode, officially, the Kandahar Province police chief, Gen. Abdul Raziq, said only four had been killed and three wounded. General Raziq also denied that there had been a young boy involved in drugging the food.
The wave of killings over the past year has police officers all over Afghanistan watching what they eat, and sleeping uneasily.
“We make sure that nobody gets the chance to poison the food,” said Sharif Agha, 26, a police sergeant who commands a small outpost in Khost city, in eastern Afghanistan. The ten officers there take turns helping the cook and make sure at least two people are in the kitchen at all times. At night, a third guard is assigned to watch the two guards normally on duty.
“I don’t know about the rest of the guys,” Sergeant Agha said, “but I have not slept properly over the past few months.”
http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/27/squabbles-in-garmsir/
Squabbles in Garmsir
By MATTHIEU AIKINS
GARMSIR, Afghanistan — “You know, we’re very worried about the future,” Hamid Khan, the telecommunications director in Garmsir, southern Afghanistan, said to Major Thomas McAvoy, the civil affairs officer attached to Kilo Company, Third Battalion, Ninth Marine Regiment. “When Najibullah was president, he also had a plan to take control of the districts and build the government.”
McAvoy winced at the comparison to the Afghan communist leader the Soviets left behind in 1989. Najibullah managed to hold out for three years before his government collapsed, despite a larger and more effective civil service, military and political team than exists under President Hamid Karzai today. “I think the coalition nations will keep helping the Afghan government in the future,” he replied.
McAvoy and the rest of the coalition governance team visit the Garmsir district headquarters a few times a week. They move through the various offices in the courtyard, clockwise. These are the offices of the director of telecommunications, the director of media relations and the governor, the community council room and the prosecutor’s office. And they are the local authorities that the Marines and their American and British civilian counterparts have been trying to put back together, after forcibly clearing the district of the Taliban between 2009 and 2011. While the military gains were remarkable, their progress on the governance side has been far more mixed.
McAvoy and the rest of the coalition governance team visit the Garmsir district headquarters a few times a week. They move through the various offices in the courtyard, clockwise. These are the offices of the director of telecommunications, the director of media relations and the governor, the community council room and the prosecutor’s office. And they are the local authorities that the Marines and their American and British civilian counterparts have been trying to put back together, after forcibly clearing the district of the Taliban between 2009 and 2011. While the military gains were remarkable, their progress on the governance side has been far more mixed.
Earlier in December, I embedded with Kilo Company in Garmsir to observe its efforts to establish a functional Afghan government presence that will survive the troops’ departure in 2014. In this, I’ve been greatly aided by a galley copy of Carter Malkasian’s book “War Comes to Garmsir.”
Malkasian is a fluent speaker of Pashto who spent two years as the senior political officer in Garmsir and became immersed in the area’s history and intricate political structure. The book represents the kind of detailed study of Afghanistan that has been badly missing: Most people associated with the international military and development missions here come in for six-month or one-year stints. (Another valuable book, albeit with a vastly different background and purpose, is Noah Coburn’s excellent ethnographic study, “Bazaar Politics.”) One mark of Malkasian’s analytical mettle is that he presents, more so than any other writer I’ve read, a clear and fair picture of the Taliban and why they enjoyed so much support in the south.
He doesn’t go as far to say this, but reading his account, the Taliban come off as Garmsir’s most legitimate local government since the era of Mohammad Zahir Shah, the last king of Afghanistan, who was deposed in 1973. This is a challenge for the current Afghan government, which rode in on the coattails of a foreign military occupation and now struggles with infighting and corruption. The odds are against it, both because of history — its current roster of officials in Kabul and the provincial capital includes many of the characters who tore the country apart during the civil war of the 1990s — and its own flawed structure. As Malkasian points out, with each local government agency — whether for health, agriculture or intelligence — answerable to heads in both the provincial and the national capitals, countless conflicts are created at the district level.
To take just one example, there is a bewildering array of security forces in Garmsir, each with a separate chain of command and its own internal rivalries: the Afghan National Police, which ultimately answer, via the provincial police chief, to the interior minister in Kabul; the Afghan National Army, which obeys the corps commander in Helmand and the defense minister; the National Directorate of Security, the intelligence service whose murky networks lead up to national head in Kabul; the Afghan National Civil Order Police; and the many militias all in their tan uniforms, who are paid and armed under the Afghan Local Police program but remain loyal to their tribes’ strongmen. A.N.P., A.N.A., N.D.S., A.N.C.O.P., A.L.P.: Presiding over this alphabet soup is the district governor, ostensibly the senior government official, who has the smallest staff and doesn’t control any of these forces directly.
Currently, there’s not even a governor in Garmsir: Both the acting governor and his deputy have been in Kabul for months, lobbying over the position. “I suspect a bidding war is taking place,” an international official told me. Thanks to the financial and military patronage provided by the internationals, local officials are free to concentrate on their own internecine squabbles. Whether they’ll be able to unite against the drastic challenges that will emerge 2014 remains to be seen.
http://news.antiwar.com/2012/12/26/gao-faults-pentagons-5-6-billion-logistics-plan-for-afghan-drawdown/
GAO Faults Pentagon’s $5.6 Billion Logistics Plan for Afghan Drawdown
Military Should Figure Out if it Wants to Ship Stuff Back First
by Jason Ditz, December 26, 2012
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has announced that it has found major flaws in the Pentagon’s $5.7 billion logistical plan for the drawdown of troops and equipment from Afghanistan and is telling them to make serious changes.
At the core of the complaint is that the Pentagon has a dubious inventory of what they actually have in Afghanistan, and that they aren’t even trying to figure out whether they should bother to ship things back in the first place.
The first half of the problem is well documented, as NATO has reportedly considered a “surge” of troops into Afghanistan just to go through all of the shipping containers various nations sent to the occupation and never bothered to open. This could open up a new round of fraud investigations, since when Canada got around to doing this they discovered many of their crates had been looted and filled with rocks and sand.
The second half may be an even bigger deal though, as with little idea what is in all those shipping containers, there has also been no consideration of whether it is even worth shipping them back stateside, or just leaving whatever is in them for the Afghans.
and building Al Qaeda one broken family at a time..........
http://news.antiwar.com/2012/12/26/yemen-fears-backlash-as-drone-strike-victims-side-with-al-qaeda/
Yemen Fears Backlash as Drone Strike Victims Side With al-Qaeda
Rights Groups Warn Drone Strikes Are a Losing Strategy
by Jason Ditz, December 26, 2012
In early September, Yemeni officials sought to bury stories about a US drone strike killing 14 civilians in an attack on a highway by insisting they were actually their own warplanes that launched the attack. Eventually, the truth came out.
It wasn’t the first time Yemensought to cover for the US in a massacre, and it likely won’t be the last. But while the US has avoided blame in the international media, at least sometimes, there is little doubt in the minds of drone victims that the attacks are US policy.
So when survivors of the drone attack and their family members start looking for revenge, they don’t have to spend much time figuring out who they want to target. The Hadi government, installed and backed by the US, cheers the air strikes and tries to cover up the ciivlian toll, so they are no help for the locals, who instead are throwing their lot in with al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) as seemingly the only group opposed to the strikes.
Abdul Rahman Berman of Yemen’s National Organization for Defending Rights and Freedoms warns that the drone policy is a losing proposition, noting that “if the Americans kill 10, al-Qaeda will recruit 100.” A similar failure has played out in Pakistan’s tribal areas, and it is a lesson entirely ignored, with US officials seemingly buying their own false claims of drone policy success.
and Iraq........
Iraq’s Sunni Protests Grow, Basra Tribal Leaders Send Delegations
Protests Center on the Key City of Ramadi
by Jason Ditz, December 27, 2012
Protests in Iraq today weren’t quite as large as yesterday‘s, but were perhaps even more significant, as the Sunni demonstrators across Anbar Province rallied in Ramadi, and were even joined by delegations representing Basra Province tribesmen.
The rallies in Ramadi are particularly significant, with demonstrators continuing to block the highway through the major city, which connects Baghdad to shipping routes in Jordan and Syria. Some flew the flag of Ba’athist Iraq.
Protest leaders accused the Maliki government of not taking their demands seriously, and warning that the protesters are willing to march on Baghdad and fight the regime directly if that doesn’t change.
Protests are expected to grow enormously tomorrow, as Friday is a usual day for prayer and protesters can organize larger crowds at mosques. The latest round of protests started when the Maliki government raided Finance Minister Rafie Issawi’s home and office, and arrested 150 members of his staff as “terrorists.”
The Maliki government has regularly claimed Sunni ministers are “terrorists” and Issawi remains the top ranking Sunni Arab in government, at least excluding Vice President Tareq Hashemi, who is in exile after being sentenced to death by pro-Maliki judges.
Anbar Protests Grow: Tens of Thousands Block Main Iraqi Highway
Rallies Sever Trade Lines to Syria and Jordan
by Jason Ditz, December 26, 2012
What started over the weekend as a few thousand demonstrators in Anbar Province has grown into a full-fledged protest movement, with tens of thousands of Sunnistaking to the streets in mass rallies, blocking the highway and cutting off a key trade route for Iraq through Syria and Jordan.
“The people want to bring down the regime” was the chant of the day, reflecting similar chants in the successful revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, and suggesting that for many, these protests go well beyond the simple matter of a few arrested government officials.
Looking back, that’s clearly how this latest round started, with the Maliki government moving against Finance Minister Rafie Issawi andarresting 150 members of his staff, including most of his bodyguards, as “terrorists.”
The claim that high-ranking Sunni politicians must be running terrorist operations out of their offices goes much deeper, with Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi still in exile and facing immediate execution if he returns to Iraq, and Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq facing similar allegations based seemingly only on his public displeasure with Prime Minister Maliki’s centralization of power.
and...
http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/iran-rejects-interference-accusation-by-gulf-arabs
Iran rejects interference accusation by Gulf Arabs
Iran rejected accusations from Gulf Arab states that it was meddling in their affairs, saying those countries were "running away from reality", an Iranian news agency reported yesterday.
Six US-allied states demanded Iran end what they called interference in the region, in a statement on Tuesday at the end of a two-day summit of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), reiterating a long-held mistrust of their main rival.
The communique did not elaborate, but the most common Gulf Arab complaint relates to Bahrain, which has repeatedly accused Tehran of interference in its internal politics by provoking protests.
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast dismissed the statement. "Shifting the responsibility for the domestic problems of the regional countries is a way of running away from reality, and blaming others or using oppressive methods are not the right ways to answer civil demands," he said, according to the ISNA news agency.
Iran sees the Gulf as its own backyard and believes it has a legitimate interest in expanding its influence there.
In Manama, Bahraini foreign minister Khalid bin Ahmed bin Mohammed Al Khalifa told reporters on Tuesday that Iran posed a "very serious threat".
"Politically, there is lots of meddling in the affairs of GCC states; an environmental threat to our region from the technology used inside nuclear facilities; and there is of course the looming nuclear programme," he said.
When asked about the Bahraini remarks, Mr Mehmanparast said they were not worth responding to, ISNA said.
and......
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/12/2012122711238644206.html
UN envoy calls for 'real change' in Syria | ||
Lakhdar Brahimi calls for installation of transitional government with full powers as Russia denies joint US peace plan.
Last Modified: 27 Dec 2012 12:32
| ||
The UN envoy said that Syrians needed more than just a cosmetic change [Reuters]
| ||
International envoy Lakhdar Brahimi has called for "real change" in war-torn Syria and the installation of a transitional government with full powers until elections can be held. The envoy unveiled his initiative in Damascus on Thursday as Russia, the most powerful ally of Syria's government, denied the existence of a joint peace plan with the United States, amid a flurry of year-end diplomatic activity on the crisis."Change should not be cosmetic; the Syrian people need and require real change, and everyone understands what that means," the UN-Arab League envoy said on the fifth day of his latest peace mission to Syria. "We need to form a government with all powers... which assumes power during a period of transition. That transition period will end with elections," Brahimi told reporters.
"The transition period should not lead to the collapse of the state and its institutions," Brahimi said, adding the initiative was incomplete. "We prefer... a project whose facilitation the parties have agreed upon, and, if they do not, the last solution is going to the (UN) Security Council which will make a binding resolution." Brahimi, who while in Damascus has held talks with Assad as well as with opposition groups tolerated by the regime, replaced former UN chief Kofi Annan after his dramatic resignation in August over what he said was the failure of major powers to back his own six-point peace plan. And a diplomat at the UN Security Council said on Wednesday the veteran Algerian troubleshooter had received no support from either side since arriving in Syria on Sunday. "Assad appears to have stonewalled Brahimi again, the UN Security Council is not even close to showing the envoy the kind of support he needs and the rebels will not now compromise," said the diplomat. Brahimi is to hold talks on Saturday with Moscow at the request of the envoy, Russia's foreign ministry said. Russia on Thursday hosted a Syrian delegation led by Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Muqdad, with its foreign ministry saying the results would be announced later in the day. "This is of course a part of the efforts we are undertaking to encourage dialogue not just with the government but all opposition forces," spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment