Tuesday, December 4, 2012

BIS gold report hints at Central Bank repatriation as well as increasing use of gold derivatives by BIS. Austrian Central Bank still playing dumb regarding its gold leasing activities. Ed Steer's Gold & Silver Report with a series of great articles set forth ...... Ned Naylor - Leyland on MSM intentionally ignoring silver manipulation story ( Shocker ) - as they ignore daily manipulations of gold and silver in London and New York.....

http://www.silverdoctors.com/were-last-weeks-gold-silver-chart-glitches-telegraphing-this-weeks-cartel-raids/

( check this article then today's gold chart..... )


WERE LAST WEEK’S GOLD & SILVER CHART “GLITCHES” TELEGRAPHING THIS WEEK’S CARTEL RAIDS?

In one of the main claims in the ongoing class action suit against JP Morgan Chase alleging price manipulation of silver, the suit alleges that JPM made over 25 massive FAKE TRADES using Saxo Bank during sparse Globex evening hours prior to major silver raids for the express purpose of TELEGRAPHING AN IMPENDING SILVER SMASH TO THEIR BUDDIES!
As it is allegedly JPMorgan’s SOP to telegraph major impending raids in the metals to other bullion banks using FAKE TRADES during thin trading, could this have been the real reason for the flash crash glitch in the gold and silver charts last week DURING SPARSE GLOBEX HOURS which saw gold flash crash from $1750 to $1715, and silver from $34.20 to $32.80?
Gold has already traded to and below the target of the chart glitch.  Will silver continue to be smashed to the glitch target of $3180??
Notice that gold has met the level of both of last week’s Globex flash crashes:  From $1750 to $1715:
Silver has not yet reached the target of the flash crash glitch at $31.80.  Will we see further weakness until the level is achieved?
After consolidating overnight throughout the Asian and London session, gold and silver are currently being dumped again on Wednesday’s COMEX open.
Silver down to $32.80, only one dollar from the flash crash target of $31.80:
Gold to $1695, the flash crash glitch target of $1699 having been achieved and surpassed:
While we were ridiculed by many in the gold and silver community for even bringing attention to the glitches (which we stated at the time appeared to in fact be a glitch), in view of the circumstantial evidence along with the cartel history of telegraphing impending price raids, it might behoove gold and silver investors to at least take notice the next time an extreme flash crash glitch appears on the gold and silver charts.



And what does these charts say other than toy of the manipulators ????? And the five day charts are scary manipulated as well..... you can just see when the algos snatch and play ( Nov 30th for Feb 2013 Gold as one example , every day for December 2012 Gold )

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gcz12.cmx

Gold Dec 12 (GCZ12.CMX)


http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GCG13.CMX

Gold Feb 13 (GCG13.CMX)

and slowing down the manipulation......


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-12-05/millisecond-analysis-latest-gold-smackdown


A Millisecond Analysis Of The Latest Gold Smackdown

Tyler Durden's picture




On December 4th, 2012 at 47 minutes and 13.1 seconds after midnight, 2,035 February Gold Futures contracts GCG3 took the market down $10 as fast as the exchange could execute the order. This invisible handthat decided that that was the perfect time to execute a trade for over 200,000 ounces and $345mm notional of gold is exposed inoh-so-visible a manner by Nanex's eagle-eyed millisecond-by-millisecond charts below. As the day wore on, there were more of these sudden 'unexplained' price moves. Cue 'Twilight Zone' music...
Via Nanex:
1. 30 Second interval chart showing trades for the first 9 hours of trading in the February 2013 Gold Futures Contract (GC.G13). The midnight crush in the first drop on the left.

2. Zoom of chart above showing about 45 seconds of time. Thin gray line is quote spread.
3. Using a 1 millisecond interval to zoom in on one second of time. The trades are the squares. The Bid/Offer is the dark gray shading. When trades first execute, then the quote follows, it's because the entire book was swept.

4. Later than morning at 3:45:05 Eastern time, a jolt to the upside.
5. Later that morning between 8:36 and 8:40am Eastern, more sudden buying and selling events took place. The chart below is an overview of these events.

6. Zoom of Chart 5 showing first event.
7. Zoom of Chart 5 showing second event.

8. Zoom of Chart 5 showing third event.
9. Zoom of Chart 7 above showing 1 second of time.

Source: Nanex







http://www.caseyresearch.com/gsd/edition/no-more-pennies-or-nickels-next-year-usa


No More Pennies or Nickels Next Year in the U.S.A.

Dec
5
"I don't know if "da boyz" have a grand plan or not...but at the moment they seem to be making it up as they go along."


¤ YESTERDAY IN GOLD AND SILVER

With the US dollar index heading lower for the second day in a row on Tuesday, the intervention in gold was far more obvious than it was on Monday.
The price was under pressure right from the Far East open on Tuesday morning...and then there was the obvious hit just before 2:00 p.m. Hong Kong time...with the second one coming during the London lunch hour.
The low of the day [$1,690.00 spot] came shortly after 9:00 a.m. in New York...and the subsequent rally ended at the London p.m. gold at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time.  The price recovered a bit once the Comex trading session was done for the day at 1:30 p.m.
The gold price closed at $1,696.80 spot...down $19.20 on the day.  Net volume was immense at around 211, 000 contracts.
The price path in silver was almost the same, with the only real difference being the low price tick of the day...$32.59 spot.  That came about ten minutes before the Comex close.
Silver closed on Tuesday at $32.91 spot...down 75 cents from Monday...but had an intraday move of over a dollar.  Net volume was a very chunky 50,000 contracts.
The platinum and palladium charts looked more or less the same as the gold and silver charts.
The dollar index continued its slow grind lower.  It declined another 23 basis points and closed at 79.67.  Most of the day's losses were in shortly before 9:00 a.m. in New York.
It's almost pointless to mention that there was no co-relation between the dollar index and the precious metals yesterday.  JPMorgan et al saw to that.

*   *   * 

The CME's Daily Delivery Report showed that 329 gold and 79 silver contracts were posted for delivery on Thursday within the Comex-approved depositories.  In gold, Jefferies and HSBC USA were the two biggest short/issuers with 170 and 143 contracts respectively.  The biggest long/stopper was JPMorgan with 212 contracts in its proprietary trading account...and another 53 contracts in its client account.
In silver the only short/issuer of note was Jefferies with 66 contracts...and JPMorgan the big long/stopper with 44 contracts in its client account.
The link to yesterday's Issuers and Stoppers Report is here.
Over at the GLD ETF, an authorized participant added 75,495 troy ounces of gold...and over at SLV, a very decent 1,033,794 troy ounces were added as well.  All this is happening despite what games were being played in the Comex paper market.
Over at Switzerland's Zürcher Kantonalbank, they updated their gold and silver ETF holdings as of the close of business on Monday.  Both gold and silver ETFs showed small withdrawals.  In gold it was 2,312 troy ounces...and in silver it was 197,341 troy ounces.
The U.S. Mint had a very decent sales report on Tuesday.  They sold 8,000 ounces of gold eagles...2,000 one-ounce 24K gold buffaloes...and 700,000 silver eagles.  It's my guess that some of those silver eagles sales occurred in the prior week...the last week of November...but were only reported yesterday.  It wouldn't surprise me if the mint pulled that same reporting stunt in the December 2012 to January 2013 period as well.  If they did, it would be three years in a row that they've done it.
Over at the Comex-approved depositories on Monday, they reported receiving 1,238,087 ounces of silver...and shipped only one good delivery bar out the door weighing 985.550 troy ounces.  The link to that activity is here.
No More Pennies Or Nickels Next Year in the U.S.A.
Mr. Geithner has been busy lately. Amongst his many other pressing tasks, he took the time to announce that the U.S. Mint will be removing the penny and nickel from circulation in the U.S. starting early next year. The reason is clear. It now costs the mint $US 0.048 to make a penny and $US 0.162 to make a nickel. They are still just above the break even point on the dime, which costs them $US 0.092 to produce. That won't last, according to Mr Geithner, so the dime will be the next to go - probably in 2014. - Bill Buckler, Gold This Week...01 December 2012
Here's a very unhappy looking chart that was sent to me by Washington state reader S.A. yesterday evening.

and selected news items....


Cops to Congress: We need logs of Americans' text messages

State and local law enforcement groups want wireless providers to store detailed information about your SMS messages for at least two years -- in case they're needed for future criminal investigations.
CNET has learned a constellation of law enforcement groups has asked the U.S. Senate to require that wireless companies retain that information, warning that the lack of a current federal requirement "can hinder law enforcement investigations."
They want an SMS retention requirement to be "considered" during congressional discussions over updating a 1986 privacy law for the cloud computing era -- a move that could complicate debate over the measure and erode support for it among civil libertarians.
As the popularity of text messages has exploded in recent years, so has their use in criminal investigations and civil lawsuits. They have been introduced as evidence in armed robbery, cocaine distribution, and wire fraud prosecutions. In one 2009 case in Michigan, wireless provider SkyTel turned over the contents of 626,638 SMS messages, a figure described by a federal judge as "staggering."
This story was posted on the cnet.com Internet site on Monday...and my thanks go out to Roy Stephens for his second story in a row in today's column.  The link is here.


GM Channel Stuffing

Those who have been reading our 2-plus year series tracking the ridiculous "bottom-left to top-right" trend in GM dealer inventory channel stuffing, know all there is to know about the modern day equivalent of AOL (in which the purchases of modern equivalents of "dial up connections" are funded by loans from the US government itself), in both (non government backstopped) business continuity terms as well as in channel stuffing notoriety.
Which is why we will present the November update of total dealer "inventory" (which rose to a record for the fresh-start company of 788,194...or a record 99K increase in two months) without commentary.
You've just read the entire Zero Hedge story...but you must click here to see the graph...and it's definitely worth the trip.  I borrowed this story from yesterday's edition of the King Report.


Senator: 'Increasingly Clear [Obama's] Comfortable Going Off the Cliff'

"I think the president is increasingly showing his hand that he is comfortable going off the cliff," Barrasso tells The Weekly Standard, in response to a question about President Obama's negotiation strategy. "He’s not involving Republicans in the process. He was playing golf this weekend with Bill Clinton, Ron Kirk, and ex-DNC chair Terry McAuliffe. He’s not seeming to be one to work together. He seems to be lecturing more than listening. And I just think that it’s increasingly clear he's comfortable going off the cliff."
The Republican senator believes Obama's posture is being reinforced by bad advice he's getting from some of his fellow Democrats. "[T]hat’s what he’s being advised to do by a number of his Democratic colleagues—Howard Dean, former chairman of the DNC said they should go off the cliff, Patty Murray, who ran the senatorial committee, said they should go off the cliff," says Barrasso in a phone interview, referring multiple times to Obama’s weekend golf outing with Democratic stalwarts.
As a Canadian watching this from north of the 49th parallel...I find this whole "fiscal cliff" affair like some sort of bad dream that I'm going to wake up from soon.  To watch my neighbour commit economic, financial, and monetary suicide within my lifetime is increasingly unbearable to watch.
This story showed up on the weeklystandard.com Internet site on Monday afternoon...and is another story that I borrowed from yesterday's edition of the King Report.  The link is here.


Copper stolen from Newark church

Thieves have targeted a Newark church twice in the past month, causing extensive damage by tearing out almost all of the copper piping in the structure.
The Clinton Avenue Presbyterian Church has had to close its soup kitchen because of a lack of heat and running water.
"It was devastating," church clerk Loretta Hazelwood said.
The pipers were cut to the furnace.  The pipes were also cut to the boiler and the thieves even tore out the water meter, leaving water pouring into the basement.
This story was posted on the myfoxny.com Internet site early yesterday evening Eastern time...and I thank Scott Pluschau for sliding it into my in-box in the wee hours of this morning.  The link is here.


*   *   * 

¤ THE WRAP

It is a maxim that in every government, there must exist, somewhere, a supreme, sovereign, absolute, and uncontrollable power; but this power resides always in the body of the people; and it never was, or can be delegated to one man or a few; the great Creator has never given to men a right to vest others with authority over them, unlimited either in duration or degree. - By the Great and General Court of the colony of Massachusetts-Bay, House of Representatives, January 23, 1776; Watertown, Mass...printed by Benjamin Edes, 1776...Massachusetts History Society
It hardly seems necessary for me to point out the obvious once again, but it was JPMorgan et al in the market again yesterday...and what they did was very much an extension of what they did on Monday.  With the dollar declining below the 80.00 mark, the most likely escape route was taken away as an attractive alternative.
But they can't keep it up forever...but to hazard a guess as to what's going to happen on a daily or weekly basis going forward is still a mug's game...and all we can do is wait this out. I don't know if "da boyz" have a grand plan or not...but at the moment they seem to be making it up as they go along.  And with the monstrous short positions in silver and gold hanging over the market, it remains to be seen how this plays itself out between now and the end of the year...and perhaps beyond.
However, with the big volumes associated with yesterday's engineered price declines in all four precious metals, it's a reasonable bet that the short positions of the 'Big 4' in both silver and gold have declined by a substantial amount.  This won't be known for sure until Friday's Commitment of Traders Report and, hopefully, all of yesterday's activity will be included.
In Far East trading on their Wednesday, both gold and silver have been working their way slowly higher...and as I write this paragraph, the London open is only fifteen minutes away.  At the moment, gold is back above the $1,700 spot price mark...and silver is back above $33.00 spot.  Volume is on the lighter side in both metals...and the dollar index has been trading sideways for the last sixteen hours or so.
And as I hit the 'send' button at 5:15 a.m. Eastern time...10:15 a.m. in London...I note that both metals were turned a bit lower at the London open.  Volumes are higher now, of course, but nothing out of the ordinary...and the dollar index is still trading sideways.
I won't hazard a guess as to what may or may not happen for the balance of the Wednesday trading session, but it's a reasonable bet that most of the price and volume activity will occur once New York begins trading at 8:20 a.m. Eastern time.
Before heading out the door this morning, I have a housekeeping item that the nice ladies that work at Casey Research asked me to run by you.  This is Casey Research's most elite service...the Casey Investment Alert [CIA].
It has been closed to new members since last November. When we decided to limit the total number of members last year, we decided to only open the doors annually or biannually, as spots became available.
Membership in this unique service is strictly capped because most of the junior explorer stocks recommended in it are very thinly traded. If we were to let membership grow too much, buying pressure based on our recommendations could skew some exceptional profit opportunities.
So now we're accepting new registrations for the next two weeks, or until available spots are filled.
This service is not cheap...and is obviously for serious investors only!  It's priced at US$3,600 annually, or US$989 quarterly...and there's a 10% processing fee on all cancelations during the 30-day trial period.  But it costs nothing to read all about it...and the link to that is here.
I'm off to bed...and I'll see you here tomorrow.







and....








anhttp://www.gata.org/node/11990


BIS gold report hints at repatriation by central banks

 Section: 
By Robert Lambourne
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I have been checking on the changes that have taken place to the gold banking business carried out by the Bank for International Settlements since March 2009 and the bank's use of gold derivatives (essentially all are gold swaps), which have grown from zero as of March 31, 2009. All the data in the table below is sourced from BIS annual reports and from the bank's 2012 interim report published in early November. Here is a link to it:
In March 2009 the BIS held gold sight accounts -- unallocated gold -- with a number of major central banks, presumably those based in traditional gold-trading markets. Apart from the bank's own gold, the source of the gold sight accounts arose from gold that was deposited in sight accounts with the BIS with all or most of it deposited with the BIS by other central banks. Historically and especially during World War II central banks used the BIS to act as an intermediary in the gold market to protect against their gold sight accounts being confiscated or blocked by the bank holding the gold deposit. So, as an example, during World War II the German central bank held gold in a BIS sight account that was in turn deposited by the BIS in London, and consequently this gold was not confiscated or blocked by the United Kingdom government in the war.
Since March 2009 there has been a marked change in the source of the gold deposited by the BIS with central banks in gold sight accounts. It has fallen from 1,197.45 tonnes as of March 31, 2009, to 509.43 tonnes as of September 30, 2012. By March 2010 the BIS had sourced 346 tonnes of gold in the form of gold swaps -- something that had not been done for many years previously or at least not disclosed.
Yet in an article published in the Financial Times on July 29, 2010, Jaime Caruana, head of the BIS, said the swaps were "regular commercial activities" for the bank. As can be seen from the table below, gold derivatives, essentially all being gold swaps, have become a regular source of gold for the BIS to deposit in gold sight accounts since this interview was given.
The decline in the amount of gold deposited with the BIS in gold sight accounts by central banks accords with the often-claimed desire of many gold owners either to take physical possession of their gold or at least to move it into an allocated form of gold account such as a BIS gold-earmarked account, which is excluded from the BIS's own balance sheet.
Also, by their nature the gold swaps entered by the BIS provide the counterparty with a higher level of comfort. The counterparties for the BIS gold swap can presumably account for the gold as an owned asset, since the explanation of the gold swap in the BIS annual reports is very specific and says, "The Bank has an obligation to return the gold at the end of the contract." (So it would appear to meet the definition of allocated gold.)
Hence, if the BIS could not get returned to it all the gold it has deposited in sight accounts as of September 30, 2012, then it would run the risk of having to obtain up to 393 tonnes of gold on the open market to return to the gold swap counterparties. This risk is not specifically considered in the BIS's own commentary on the risks it faces.
In isolation this change in the mix of the sources of the BIS gold used in its gold banking business cannot be said to prove anything. But the reduction in the amount of gold deposited with the BIS in sight accounts is consistent with a desire by owners to exert greater control over their gold. Further, one could reasonably speculate whether gold swaps (and their increased proportion as a source of gold for the BIS gold banking business) have been used by the BIS to supply gold to avoid a default by a central bank when being asked to return the unallocated gold held in a sight account deposited with the BIS as the BIS has faced a reduction in that source of unallocated gold itself.
Whatever the truth may be, the changes in the table below are consistent with there being a tight physical market for gold where certain central banks are taking action to get a firmer grip on their metal.

*  *  * 

Gold banking business of the Bank for International Settlements March 31, 2009, to 30th September 2012. Excludes BIS-owned gold.
.
.
Totals in millions of Special Drawing Rights.
....................... 3/2009 ..... 3/2010 ...... 3/2011 ....... 3/2012 ....... 9/2012
Third-party gold
deposited by BIS
in gold sight
accounts
 ....... 23,039.1 ... 40,219.9 ... 33,177.8 .... 31,881.7 ... 33,565.6
Gold deposited
in BIS gold sight
accounts
 ...... 23,039.1 ... 32,057 .... 21,264.3 ... 19,617.6 ... 18,948.3
Gold
derivatives
 ....... 0 ......... 8,162.9 ..... 11,913.5 .... 12,264.1 ... 14,617.3
Total gold
deposited in gold
sight accounts and
derivatives
 .... 23,039.1 ... 40,219.9 .. 33,177.8 ... 31,881.7 ... 33,565.6
.
.
Tonnes
Third-party
gold deposited
by BIS in gold
sight accounts
 .. 1,197.45 ..... 1,704.8 .... 1,139 ......... 923 ....... 902.43
Gold deposited
in BIS gold sight
accounts
 .......... 1,197.45 ..... 1,358.8 ....... 730 ......... 568 ..... 509.43
Gold derivatives .. 0 ................ 346 .......... 409 ........ 355 ...... 393
Total third-party
gold deposited by
BIS in gold sight
accounts and gold
derivatives
 ..... 1,197.45 ...... 1,704.8 ...... 1,139 ....... 923 ...... 902.43
Gold earmarked accounts
.............................. 212 ............. 212 .......... 297 ........ 323 ........ N/A
Robert Lambourne is a British businessman and consultant to GATA.


and.....

http://www.gata.org/node/11988


Austrian central bank refuses to answer gold leasing questions

 Section: 
By Lars Schall
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
A GATA Dispatch on November 26 was headlined "Austrian Press Agency Cites GATA in Report on Possible Audit of Austria's Gold":
Four days later I sent by e-mail this interview request to Christian Gutlederer, spokesman for the Austrian central bank, the Oesterreichische Nationalbank:
"Dear Mr. Gutlederer:
"My name is Lars Schall. I'm a freelance journalist for finance from Germany. I'm copying this note to Chris Powell, secretary of the U.S.-based Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, GATA.
"My question: would it be possible to talk with you as the person who's taking care of the press at Austria's central bank about this topic -- http://www.gata.org/node/11961 -- during next week via telephone in an English interview that would be published at GATA's Internet site?
"All the best, Lars Schall."
The following day I wrote to Gutlederer again after I watched programming on the Russia Today television network:
"Dear Mr. Gutlederer:
"You may be interested to watch the beginning of this current 'Keiser Report' (until 6:06):
"Please be aware and take into consideration that Stacy Herbert and Max Keiser are informed about this inquiry of mine.
"Best regards, Lars Schall."
The following Monday saw a certain consultation of mine, after I which I again directed an e-mail to Mr. Gutlederer:
"Dear Mr. Gutlederer:
"One question that I would have for you would be: Over what time frame did the Oesterreichische Nationalbank lease some of its gold out?
"Here's the context. Based on this information -- http://www.gata.org/node/11961 -- I've asked the Canadian financial analyst and consultant to GATA, Rob Kirby, the following question:
"Since the Austrian central bank released a figure of earnings attached to a certain amount of gold leased out, could you reverse-engineer the earnings figure to find the percentage of the gold reserve leased out? The lease rates, the gold prices over the period, and the size of Austria’s alleged gold holdings can be found in official data, right? The Austrians say 16 percent is leased out, but is this correct?
"Mr. Kirby answered:
"'I understand what you are getting at – and here is my feedback:
"'Precious metals lease-rate nomenclature is [intentionally] deceptive.
"'The above diagram illustrates how lease rates really reflect the return of the bullion bank that 'arranges' the loan, not the 'return' of the lender of bullion that is depicted by GOFO.
"'So what you really want to examine to calculate the Austrian central bank claims is GOFO rates.
"'I believe I read that the Austrian central bank claims they made E300 million from leasing gold. My question now is: Over what time frame?
"'When you have the GOFO rates and the relevant time frame, you can ascertain how much gold must have been leased.'
"Although I don't expect a response from you anymore, Mr. Gutlederer, I assume that the Austrian public will ask this question as well.
"Best regards, Lars Schall."
I thought it could be helpful to show Mr. Gutlederer more of the questions I had in mind, and so I wrote him on the same day one more time:
"Dear Mr. Gutlederer:
"Here are the other questions I would have. On Wednesday we will publish them, adding most likely the statement that you have declined to make a comment, as this is the state of affairs.
"Best regards, Lars Schall.
"-- Does the OeNB do business related to option transactions in the gold market?
"-- What guarantees, if any, did the bank have for the return of its gold? What risk guidelines exist for the leasing? Who set
them up?
"-- When the claim is uncollectible, what will happen on your balance sheet and when will that be communicated to whom?
"-- How high was the average lease rate?
"-- How and why did the OeNB's gold leasing come about?
"-- Who proposed gold leasing to the bank or what gave the bank the idea for it?
"-- What did the bank think would be done with the gold it leased? Did the bank have any idea that the leasing might be undertaken for currency market intervention generally or gold price suppression particularly? If so, did the bank approve of that? What DID the bank think would be accomplished by whoever borrowed its gold?
"Are the bank's gold records, including its communications with other central banks and financial institutions, including the Bank for International Settlements, fully public? Can people inspect them? If not, why not? Why does the OeNB oppose transparency in its operations?"
Today Mr. Gutlederer finally responded to my four e-mails. He wrote:
"Dear Mr. Schall:
"Thank you for your mail. Please understand that we are not able to provide further detailed information. But we assure you that the Oesterreichische Nationalbank acts extremely responsibly with regard to its currency reserves, including the management of our gold positions.
"Best regards, Christian Gutlederer, press spokesman,
Communications Division, Oesterreichische Nationalbank."
That's too bad, as a candid account of the OeNB's gold policy might have been interesting, particularly to the people of Austria. Maybe their representatives in Parliament can press these questions.
-----

and....

http://www.silverdoctors.com/ned-naylor-leyland-msm-intentionally-ignoring-silver-manipulation-story/#more-18271

NED NAYLOR-LEYLAND: MSM INTENTIONALLY IGNORING SILVER MANIPULATION STORY

In the latest Keiser Report, Max Keiser talks to our friend Ned Naylor-Leyland of Cheviot Asset Management about thefishy smoke signals blowing at the LBMA regarding silver contracts and about the debate between inflation, deflation, hyperinflation actually being a debate about the final denouement of paper currencies. Ned also reveals that the LBMA is about ten times larger than the Comex and that BBC’s flagship program, Panorama, had interviewed him and Andrew Maguire about silver manipulation and yet have never aired the episode.
Full interview below:


and daily manipulations....

http://www.silverdoctors.com/gold-silver-smashed-again-on-crimex-open-as-gold-smashed-below-1700-silver-below-33/

GOLD & SILVER SMASHED AGAIN ON CRIMEX OPEN AS GOLD SMASHED BELOW $1700, SILVER BELOW $33

The cartel has successfully stuffed gold back under $1700, and silver under $33 on this morning’s COMEX open.
Silver is down over a dollar to $32.71, and gold was smashed $25 to $1690 It remains increasingly evident just how crucial $1730-$1750 is to gold, as once this level is taken out again to the upside, gold will pop back to its September high of $1800, and through there, will quickly move back to its all-time nominal highs near $1920 placed in August 2011 in the wake of the US downgrade.
With QE4 appearing set for next week, and a further debt downgrade likely in the coming months, gold and silver look poised to explode to the upside. [Read more...]

and Ed Steer's gold and silver report ( covering trading data primarily  for Monday ) 

http://www.caseyresearch.com/gsd/edition/getting-tough-gold-imports-wont-work-two-former-indian-central-bankers-say

Getting Tough on Gold Imports Won't Work, Two Former Indian Central Bankers Say

Dec
4
"I wasn't amused that the precious metals shares got sold off as heavily as they did..."


¤ YESTERDAY IN GOLD AND SILVER

Just eye-balling the Kitco gold chart below, it's obvious to me that the gold price, despite several serious attempts to do so, wasn't going to be allowed to break above the $1,720 spot mark anywhere on Planet Earth yesterday and, with the exception of the high tick of the day [$1,724.10 spot] at the London p.m. gold fix, it didn't.
The gold price finished the day at $1,716.00 spot...up a whole 80 cents from Friday's New York close.  Net volume was very light at only around 108,000 contracts.
Here's the New York Spot Gold [Bid] chart on its own...and three of four of gold's attempts to climb above the above mentioned price got turned back...and the glaring one is at the 3:00 p.m. GMT London gold fix...10:00 a.m. Eastern.
Silver rallied right from the New York open on Sunday night...and its Far East high came around 10:00 a.m. Hong Kong time.  It was all down hill from there until the noon silver fix in London.
That proved to be the low of the day.  The subsequent rally ran into the usual not-for-profit seller at the afternoon London gold fix...and that was it.
Silver closed at $33.66 spot...up 22 cents on the day.  Net volume was a rather unexciting 30,500 contracts...give or take.
The dollar index, which closed on Friday at 80.24, was under pressure right from the get-go in Far East trading on their Monday morning...which most likely explains the initial rally in gold and silver.
The index sank under the 80.00 mark around 3:00 p.m. in Hong Kong...about an hour before London opened.  From there it kept declining in fits and starts...closing around the 79.89 mark...down about 35 basis points on the day.
It was obvious that both gold and silver wanted to rally at midday in London...and at the Comex open...but it's equally obvious that there were forces standing by to make sure that it didn't happen.
The US dollar index packed up on the ino.com Internet site around 9:00 a.m. yesterday morning...and as you can see, I stole the chart below from one of Peter Spina's websites...goldseek.com...and I'm sure he won't mind.

*   *   * 


The CME's Daily Delivery Report for 'Day 3' in the December delivery month showed that 1,906 gold and 712 silver contracts were posted for delivery on Wednesday within the Comex-approved depositories.
In gold, the big short/issuer was Deutsche Bank with 1,741 contracts posted for delivery...and in very distant second place came the Bank of Nova Scotia with 162 contracts.  The big long/stopper in gold was JPMorgan Chase with 1,565 contracts...275 in its client account and 1,290 in its proprietary [in house] trading account.  There were about a dozen other small stoppers accounting for the rest.
In silver, the big short/issuer was Deutsche Bank as well with 579 contracts...and JPMorgan, in its proprietary account, was in second with 106 contracts.  The biggest long/stopper was JPMorgan in its client account with 341 contracts.  Second was Barclays with 225 contracts...and third was Credit Suisse First Boston with 98.
The Issuers and Stoppers Report is well worth a few minutes of your time...and the link is here.  Note the delivery info in palladium as well...Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan and Barclays.
If you haven't figured it out already, it should be patently obvious that JPMorgan is at the center of the precious metals universe.
There were no reported changes in either GLD or SLV yesterday...and no sales report from the U.S. Mint, either.
Over at the Comex-approved depositories on Friday, they reported receiving no silver at all...but shipped 458,050 troy ounces out the door.  The link to that activity is here.


*  *   *  

selected news items.....

Strikers Shut Down the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach

Strikes in the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach that began last Tuesday are delivering a blow to the U.S. economy.
Clerical workers from the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 63 have been without a contract for 2.5 years, and negotiations between them and the ports broke down last Monday.
The ILWU has accused management of trying to outsource clerical jobs to overseas workers that are paid far less and receive fewer benefits.
This story from the businessinsider.com was posted on their Internet site early yesterday afternoon Eastern time...and I thank Roy Stephens for this first offering of the day.  The link is here.


Treasury Scarcity to Grow as Fed Buys 90% of New Bonds

Even as U.S. government debt swells to more than $16 trillion, Treasuries and other dollar fixed- income securities will be in short supply next year as the Federal Reserve soaks up almost all the net new bonds.
The government will reduce net sales by $250 billion from the $1.2 trillion of bills, notes and bonds issued in fiscal 2012 ended Sept. 30, a survey of 18 primary dealers found. At the same time, the Fed, in its efforts to boost growth, will add about $45 billion of Treasuries a month to the $40 billion in mortgage debt it’s purchasing, effectively absorbing about 90 percent of net new dollar-denominated fixed-income assets, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.
“The shrinking amount of bonds in the market is lowering rates and not just benefiting the Treasury, but providing lower rates for private-sector decision-makers as well,” Zach Pandl, a senior interest-rate strategist in Minneapolis at Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC, which oversees $340 billion, said in a Nov. 30 telephone interview. “The Fed is not creating this scarcity to help out the Treasury, it’s primarily to get the economy going.”
More paper games.  This Bloomberg story showed up on their website yesterday morning Mountain Standard Time...and it's Elliot Simon's second offering of the day.  It's certainly worth skimming...and the link is here.


China surpasses U.S. as top global trader

Shin Cheol-soo no longer sees his future in the United States.
The South Korean businessman supplied components to American automakers for a decade. But this year, he uprooted his family from Detroit and moved home to focus on selling to the new economic superpower: China.
In just five years, China has surpassed the United States as a trading partner for much of the world, including U.S. allies such as South Korea and Australia, according to an Associated Press analysis of trade data. As recently as 2006, the U.S. was the larger trading partner for 127 countries, versus just 70 for China. By last year the two had clearly traded places: 124 countries for China, 76 for the U.S.
This AP article, filed from Seoul, was posted on the finance.yahoo.com Internet site Sunday evening Eastern...and I thank Matthew Nel for sending it.  The link is here.


Egypt’s judges refuse to oversee referendum

A key judicial body has refused to oversee a December 15 referendum on the new draft constitution as judges effectively went on strike Sunday, suspending work indefinitely, amid mounting tension in the country.
Protests by Islamists allied to President Mohamed Mursi forced Egypt’s highest court to adjourn its work indefinitely on Sunday, intensifying a conflict between some of the country’s top judges and the head of state.
The Supreme Constitutional Court said it would not convene until its judges could operate without “psychological and material pressure”, saying protesters had stopped the judges from reaching the building.
This New Wires story showed up on the france24.com Internet site yesterday...and it's courtesy of Roy Stephens.  The link is here.


Mother Of Former Greek PM Papandreou Linked To $714 Million Swiss Bank Account

The so-called "Lagarde List" is causing trouble in Greece again, with new reports linking it to the very top levels of political society.
On Sunday two Greek weekly magazines, To Vima and Proto Thema, reported that Margarita Papandreou, mother of former Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou, had been linked to a mysterious Swiss bank account by members of the Financial Crimes Squad (SDOE).
The largest figure on the Lagarde List was a 550 million euro deposit ($714 million) under the name Maria Panteli, but according to reports in To Vima, Nikolaos Lekkas, the Manager-Comptroller of SDOE, said that, “behind the biggest deposit on the list is Mrs. Margarita Papandreou.”
This news item showed up on the businessinsider.com Internet site yesterday afternoon...and it's another contribution from Roy Stephens.  The link is here.


Five King World News Blogs/Audio Interviews

1.  Robert Fitzwilson: "Confiscation, Price Suppression & the True Gold & Silver Price".  2.  John Embry: "Here is What Will Break the Massive Silver Short Positions".  3.  Michael Pento: "Lucky Horseshoes & Empty Promises Won't Halt This Decline".  The first audio interview is with Gerald Celente...and the second audio interview is with Eric Sprott.  The Sprott interview is a must listen.


Banks consider quitting food speculation due to role in global hunger

Financial giant Barclays is considering an end to food speculation, a controversial practice linked to sudden, dangerous spikes in global food prices.
Rich Ricci, head of Barclays' corporate and investment banking arm, told British lawmakers on 28 November that public disapproval of food speculation may push his bank, the world's third-largest, to stop altogether.
"Market speculation is playing a role in global hunger. Now that science has made this clear, speculation should be unacceptable," said Yaneer Bar-Yam, president of the New England Complex Systems Institute.
Speculation -- investors betting on food prices -- has existed for decades, but until the late 1990s was restricted to farmers and food producers, who have direct market interests and used bets to offset their risks.
And that's precisely the situation that should exist in all commodities...the precious metals included.  This story showed up on the wired.co.uk Internet site yesterday...and is a must read as well. I thank Elliot Simon for his last story in today's column...and the link is here.


Multi-million gold heist from boat in Caribbean

Armed men dressed as police boarded a fishing boat Friday in Curaçao and stole about 70 gold bars worth an estimated $11.5 million (£7.2 million), police in the southern Caribbean island said.
The boat's captain was struck in the head in the early-morning assault before the thieves made off with the gold in three cars, police spokesman Reggie Huggins said. Authorities believe there were six men involved in the heist. No suspects are in custody.
The captain and three crew members were from the South American country of Guyana, he said.
Huggins declined to say who owned the boat or to provide any details about the possible source of the gold.
very interesting story...and I wonder if we've heard the last of this?  It was posted on The Telegraph's website just after midnight GMT on Saturday morning...and I thank Scott Pluschau for digging it up on our behalf.  The link ishere.


Casey Research: Gold Supply Crunch Coming?

A number of market analysts and gold-industry insiders are warning about a possible shortage of gold supply. Barrick CEO Jamie Sokalsky recently stated that since gold production is inelastic (i.e., insensitive to price changes) there will be a very limited increase in supply from gold producers, even during sharp increases in the gold price. Rick Rule, a billionaire and avid gold investor, pointed out that while we're seeing spectacular demand, a number of issues will make supply very tight in the future, especially among retailers.
The issues facing gold miners are well known: depletion of existing mines, lower grades, and fewer new discoveries - especially big and rich ones. Further, miners face increased calls for nationalization, demands from workers for higher pay or from local communities for better infrastructure, and - of course - environmental concerns. Many mining company representatives say it's getting harder to not only find large deposits but to get those deposits into production. Some estimate it now takes twice as long as to go from discovery to production vs. a decade ago.
These warnings aren't always taken seriously, especially by those who see that mine production has been growing. At first glance, they're correct - but only if you look at the short-term picture. The following chart shows that global mine production has indeed been rising since 2008. From 2009 through 2011, output rose an average of 3.9% per year. However, we know that a good chunk of this increase is due to China, and upon excluding its output, you can see how it alters the global picture.
This essay was written by Casey Metals Team Researcher Alena Mikhan...and it was embedded in yesterday's edition of the Casey Daily Dispatch.  The link ishere.


*   *   * 

¤ THE WRAP

I have no doubt that the CFTC is publishing accurate data on COMEX silver. Without that data, I couldn’t begin to make a case for manipulation. The problem is that all the agency does is to publish accurate data that prove that silver is manipulated in price...and then refuses to react to the clear proof of manipulation. Due to a decrease in reported spread positions in this week’s disaggregated COT report, JPMorgan’s 38,000 contract silver short position “only” increased to 34.7% of the entire net COMEX short position from the previous week’s 34%. But the 190 million ounces that the 38,000 contracts represent is equal to 25% of the world’s total annual silver mine production of 760 million oz. If one trading entity was short 25% of the annual world production of any other commodity that entity would be in jail the day it became known. For that entity in silver to be a systemically important US bank is shocking in its own regard. In many ways, I admit that this is so extreme as to not be fully comprehendible. Believe me when I tell you that I can hardly comprehend that I label JPMorgan as crooked and get away with it. - Silver analyst Ted Butler... 01 December 2012
Even though volume was pretty light in both silver and gold yesterday, it was obvious [at least to me] that the prices of both metals weren't allowed to get far, even though the dollar index dropped below the psychologically important 80.00 mark.
I wasn't amused that the precious metals shares got sold off as heavily as they did...and I'll quote a paragraph on this from my Saturday column...
"I'd like to think that it's strong hands buying all the shares that are falling off the table as weak-kneed day traders hit the 'sell' button...but I'm always concerned that "da boyz" are buying up all these shares in order to dump them later when they need to suppress the share prices as well.  I know that John Embry would be in total agreement with this scenario.  But maybe I'm looking for a black bear in a dark room that's not there."
I leave it up to you, dear reader, to ponder the notion of whether or not there is any truth in that paragraph...for, or against.
As you may remember, I've had correspondence with Scotiabank here in Canada about whether or not they were the bank that was fingered by the CFTC as the "non-U.S. bank" in their November Bank Participation Report.  All enquires sent by myself...and other readers...ended up with the same "non-denial denial" type of answer.
So, on Sunday, I sent an e-mail off to the ombudsman at Scotiabank...and here is what I had to say...
02 December 2012
Mr. Charles Dougall
Ombudsman
Scotiabank
Hi Charles,
I've been trying to get an answer to a question that I asked of your firm a month or so ago.
I started off with Andy Montano at Scotia Mocatta...and have since graduated to Rick Waugh...and got immediately passed off to Dave Shearim.  I have not received a direct answer, except for the usual 'non-denial denial'...the normal runaround corporations give when they really don't want to answer and are just trying to blow someone off.
I'm not asking for trading secrets, or the trading positions of any client [in-house or otherwise] that may exist over at Scotia Mocatta...as I fully understand that this client privileged information.
Here is the sequence e-mails as posted in 'The Wrap' section of my daily column over atCasey Research on November 6th...
[There was a bit more to this e-mail than that at the end, but what you see above is the essence of what I sent]
The reply I got back on Monday was as follows...
Dear Mr. Steer,

We acknowledge receipt of your email dated December 2nd.

After a preliminary review of your email, we wish to inform you that there are certain issues that are deemed to be outside the mandate of the Office of the Ombudsman, which may include the issue(s) you have raised.  Having said that, we will make inquiries into your concerns and will respond to you further in due course.

Yours truly,

Marlaine Radke
Assistant Ombudsman
Scotiabank - Executive Offices
44 King Street West
Toronto, ON  M5H 1H1
Telephone: (416) 933-3299
Fax:  (416) 933-3276

And that's where it sits at this point...and I'll let you know the contents of any further correspondence that I receive, or send.  I get the impression from the tone of the reply, that I'm not going to get very far, but you never know.
Both gold and silver came under selling pressure the moment that Far East trading began on their Tuesday.  Then, as you've already noted, the bid disappeared shortly before 2:00 p.m. Hong Kong time...or the high-frequency traders showed up...and the gold price dropped ten dollars in just a few minutes.  This decline occurred in all four precious metals.
Since those lows, they have recovered somewhat...and their respective rallies have continued [in fits and starts] into the first hour or so of trading in London.  Whether these rallies will be allowed to continue is impossible to tell...but as I also said in my Saturday column, it's a mug's trying to predict what the precious metals will do price-wise when the heavy hands of JPMorgan Chase et al are in the market.
The dollar index has been in a slow but steady decline all through Far East and the early London trading session as well...and is down about 23 basis points as I hit the 'send' button at 5:15 a.m. Eastern time.  Volumes are monstrous...over 45,000 contracts in gold...and 9,000+ in silver.  Fortunately, all of this...along with New York's price/volume activity...will be in Friday's Commitment of Traders Report, as the cut-off is at the 1:30 p.m. Eastern time Comex close today.
And I suggest you re-read Ted Butler's quote under the cartoons above to give you some idea of the meaning of "obscene and grotesque" when it come to a short position in the precious metals...especially silver.  Between JPM and Scotiabank...if they are the second big silver short...they hold a short position of over 45% of the entire Comex futures market in silver.  That was as of the Tuesday cut-off for last week's COT Report...and it may have declined since.  But by how much, won't be known until Friday.
What the precious metals do price-wise is entirely up to them...and has nothing to do with legitimate supply and demand fundamentals.
That's more than enough for today...and I'll be very interested in the price action in New York when I switch my computer on later this morning.
See you tomorrow.




And gold being scooped up by China ? Two interesting items below.....

http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/john-rubino/wholesale-gold-inventories-evaporating


Wholesale Gold Inventories Evaporating

In this week’s interview with gold dealer Tom Cloud of National Numismatic Associates, we cover one very timely topic – the sudden decline in gold inventories – and one perennial question – how can an individual put physical precious metals in an IRA.
DollarCollapse: Good to talk to you again Tom. Let’s start with your observation that the major gold wholesalers don’t seem to have their usual level of inventory. Why the sudden tightness?
Tom Cloud: Of the seven or eight major wholesalers that send me price sheets, almost every one is having supply issues. Some [coins and bars] I can get right away, but most take between a few days and two weeks.
The wholesalers don’t necessarily know why this is, but some speculate that the 58 tons that China’s central bank purchased in September was responsible, and that [the Chinese] purchased at least that much more in October. When a big seller elects to sell something they don’t even put it in the market any more, they just call up China’s central bank, and we see the report four weeks later, if we see it at all.
And it’s not just China. Central banks in general are buying. Until 2011 central banks were selling gold but in the last two years hardly any are selling and many are buying. I’ve been doing this for 35 years and last month made my first sale to a central bank.

Another factor is the new Basel III agreement in which gold counts for what it’s worth rather than 50% of what it’s worth, which makes it a more attractive asset for banks. And the final factor is that more Americans are moving into metals, which is producing more small orders to go with the big orders from central banks. It’s different for each wholesaler, but the overall effect is to tighten inventories.

DC: That’s great news for gold bugs. Now, for those who have money in an IRA and want to convert some of it to bullion, how can they do that?
TC: We’re starting to see people actually move physical gold out of these ETFs. GLD, for instance, has been trading at a big discount. Why would GLD be selling at a discount if there wasn’t anything wrong with the fund? Of course there’s plenty wrong with it, as Andrew McGuire has testified.
Instead of bullion ETFs, a lot of people are choosing to set up self-directed IRAs that can hold bullion directly. The first step is to find a government-approved custodian. There are ten or eleven out there but I find the two most user-friendly to be Sterling Trust and Goldstar Trust. You get an application online, along with a rollover or transfer form, fill these out and submit them, and your existing IRA is transferred to the custodian. Then you use those funds to buy metals and have them stored.
You have two fees per year: a custodian fee of around $75 or $80 annually, in return for which they send you quarterly statements and 1099s for the years when you take a distribution. Then you pay the depository, generally Delaware Depository Service Corporation (DDSC), which stores the physical metal in your allocated account, with your name on it. Their fee is $125 per year for anything between zero and $100,000. For example, if somebody transferred $20,000 into a precious metals IRA then they’ve got about $200 in fees, or about 1% a year. The more you have the lower the percentage would be. When you get to $100,000 they’ll charge 60 basis points on each dollar after that.

DC: Can you deposit your own bullion in this kind of an account?

TC: Yes, but the amount has to be below what you can put into an IRA in that year. The amounts differ for SEP and traditional IRAs.
DC: What if you want to take possession your metal?
TC: They’ll deliver it to you. If you’re old enough to take IRA distributions there would be no penalty but it would be taxable and they’d 1099 you. Here’s an interesting point: Many dealers will pay above spot for Gold Eagles and other major coins and bars. So let’s say you want to liquidate five gold eagles. You can ask the custodian to convert them to cash at spot and send you a check. Or you can take delivery and sell them yourself for the extra 2%.


and from China Daily...


Interbank system to help gold shine

BY WU YIYAO IN SHANGHAI
Published: Dec 4 2012 8:50
 Email |  Print |  Share Text Size 

JING WEI / FOR CHINA DAILY
The headquarters of the Shanghai Gold Exchange. The exchange and China Foreign Exchange Trade System have launched an interbank system for gold price quotes to attract more investors to the precious metal.
A new interbank system for gold price quotes by Shanghai Gold Exchange could boost China's gold market and attract more investors to the precious metal, analysts have said.
The system, which went live on Monday, will allow approved traders from as many as 20 banks to obtain gold price quotes through the China Foreign Exchange Trading System & National Interbank Funding Center, a subsidiary of the country's central bank, according to a statement released by the exchange.
The transactions will be cleared through the exchange, according to the announcement.
This trial of interbank over-the-counter gold trading comes as a further step in the opening-up of China's gold market. The system will benefit domestic institutions' trade in large volumes of bullion and attract more individual investors to the precious metal, said Chen Xin, gold analyst with Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co Ltd.
The trading mechanism now used by individual investors still relies on a matching system. During the trial period for the new system, banks that have been approved to operate in the interbank market will be allowed to engage in over-the-counter trading, according to the exchange.
As many as 20 banks have received approvals to test out the interbank market, including Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd, China Construction Bank Corp, Bank of China Ltd, Bank of Communications Ltd, HSBC Bank (China) Co Ltd and Standard Chartered Bank (China) Ltd, the announcement said.
Buyers and sellers through the new system will each be charged a fee of 0.04 percent, according to rules announced by the exchange.
The introduction of interbank gold trading will enable gold investors to choose from among a wider variety of investments and make gold trading more subject to market forces, the exchange said.
The interbank market will also lead to a significant increase in gold trading, Chen said.
It will eventually be opened to banks other than those that are currently approved, said Jiang Qi, a gold analyst with the Fujian province-based Industrial Bank Co Ltd. He said the system will help banks develop a greater number of financial products that are related to gold trading.
The exchange said in early November that it will initiate over-the-counter trading, gold exchange-traded funds, Friday-night trading and take steps to improve the leasing market.
China is opening its domestic market for precious metals to the international community as Shanghai looks to offer gold exchange-traded funds, said officials attending a conference on gold in Hong Kong.
wuyiyao@chinadaily.com.cn






No comments:

Post a Comment