Thursday, November 8, 2012

Gold and Silver news - updated through November 11th ! Harvey's blogspot - November 8th .....Casey Report - November 8th - data fom November 7th as well as news of note.....

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-11/chinese-gold-imports-surge-september-ytd-total-surpasses-official-indian-holdings



Chinese Gold Imports Surge In September, YTD Total Surpasses Official Indian Holdings



Tyler Durden's picture




Anyone who may have been concerned by the slowdown in Chinese gold imports in August, when the country imported "only" 53.5 tons of gold from Hong Kong (down from 75.8 in July), can breathe a sigh of relief. According to the Hong Kong Census Bureau, in September Chinese gross imports soared by 30% reverting to the long-term trendline of 65 tons in gross imports per month, and rising to a total of 69.7 tons. Net imports were 40% less, although that excludes organic Chinese gold mining and recirculation, which is why for all intents and purposes the gross number is the apples to apples one. And using that, Year-To-Date China has now imported a whopping 582 tons of gold, more than the official holdings of India at 558 tons, and which through November has certainly surpassed the holdings of the Netherlands, and make China's gross imports in just 2012 nominally the equivalent of Top 10 largest sovereign holder of gold.


This way at least we know where China is recycling all that vast trade surplus, which incidentally in October just printed, goalseeked or not, at the highest level - $32 billion - since January of 2009. Too bad China no longer recycles all those excess reserves into US Treasury paper (as we showed previously here).



Where does this put China:



And in historical perspective: the recent surge in demand for gold is quite unmistakeable:

and....







































http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2012/11/sprott-physical-silver-trust-prices.html


Press Release
Sprott Physical Silver Trust Prices Follow-on Offering of Trust Units In An Aggregate Amount of US$269,575,000

Nov 9, 2012

TORONTO, Nov. 9, 2012 /CNW/ - Sprott Physical Silver Trust (the "Trust") (NYSE: PSLV / TSX: PHS.U), a trust created to invest and hold substantially all of its assets in physical silver bullion and managed by Sprott Asset Management LP, announced today that it has priced its follow-on offering of 20,500,000 transferable, redeemable units of the Trust ("Units") at a price of US$13.15 per Unit(the "Offering"). As part of the Offering, the Trust has granted the underwriters an over-allotment option to purchase up to 3,075,000 additional Units. The gross proceeds from the Offering will be US$269,575,000 (US$310,011,250 if the underwriters exercise in full the over-allotment option). 

The Trust will use the net proceeds of the Offering to acquire physical silver bullion in accordance with the Trust's objective and subject to the Trust's investment and operating restrictions described in the prospectus related to the Offering. Under the trust agreement governing the Trust, the net proceeds of the Offering per Unit must be not less than 100% of the most recently calculated net asset value per Unit of the Trust prior to, or upon determination of, pricing of the Offering. 

The Units are listed on NYSE Arca and the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols "PSLV" and "PHS.U", respectively. The Offering will be made simultaneously in the United States and Canada by underwriters led by Morgan Stanley and RBC Capital Markets in the United States and RBC Capital Markets and Morgan Stanley in Canada...





http://www.silverdoctors.com/silver-cot-report-11912-commercials-cover-20-million-net-short-ounces/


SILVER COT REPORT 11/9/12: COMMERCIALS COVER 20 MILLION NET SHORT OUNCES!

Silver COT Report 11/9/12
Commercial paper added a large 1,787 longs on the week but also covered a very large -2,267 shorts to end the week with 45.63% of all open interest, a decrease of -0.75% in their share since last week, and now stand as a group at 248,390,000 ounces net short, which is a decrease of just over 20,000,000 net short ounces from the previous week. 

Large speculators were forced out of a massive 2,552 longs and reduced 454 short contracts decreasing their net long position to 170,595,000 ounces, a decrease in their net long position of just over 10.4 million ounces from the prior week.


Small speculators sold off a huge 1,131 longs and interestingly added a significant 825 short contracts for a net long position of 77,795,000 ounces a decrease of almost 10,000,000 ounces net long from the prior week.

This is a rare week where we get to see very clearly, in the COT numbers, the manipulative power of the commercial net short positions.

Silver price took a massive downturn on Friday followed by equally massive upturn on Tuesday.  What is so significant is that the numbers in both the large speculators and short speculators do not reflect massive long buying that agrees with that upturn on Tuesday.  Were they even buying longs into this so-called rally?  The answer is yes but they were probably late comers to the rally and during the down turn on Friday probably sold far more longs than we see in the numbers so their long buying on Tuesday does not even register or come close to breaking even for the close of the period Tuesday afternoon.  I’ll try to explain…

In the aggregated commercials we see two equally impressive numbers – heavy long buying and even heavier short covering.  True to their mandate, this was a classic short covering price raid followed by heavy long buying while at the same time the speculators were stunned trying to figure out if a bottom was in the cards.  Yes, the bottom was in but it is the bottom that has been set by the commercials not by the market.


What we see in the chart from Sunday night to Monday morning is a hard fake where price rises a little then goes down about .40 only to be followed by significant volume with a slightly upward price action on Monday morning.  This is where the commercials buy all their longs while the specs are buying shorts.  Notice the shorts bought by the small specs.  What the commercials effectively did was get the speculators to believe the bottom was not in therefore they bought shorts (while the commercials are buying the other side of the bet long).  By 12 noon on Tuesday, these commercials have the speculators believing there is a long rally going on and they dive into the market buying with both hands only to get slammed down on Wednesday, a long stop price raid, followed by price drifting upwards ever since.  The commercials, mostly the swap dealers, are going to make nice profits off these longs they got at the so-called bottom.

To summarize, the price raid was so vicious the speculators were stunned and did not come even remotely close to recovering their prior numbers on Tuesday before insult to injury was added during Wednesday’s price raid.
The most important data point, I believe, of this COT is the producer merchant numbers.  Net change wise they were insignificant.  They even added a little to their net short position above last week’s numbers.  They are ready to pounce!

The commercials fully control price going down and price going up and this is clear data on how they do it.

The manipulative net short tag team match continues…


and....





http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-09/exclusive-bank-england-fed-no-indication-should-course-be-given-bundesbank


( So now there is proof Germany's gold has been ripped off - if this was done before the rehypo / swap games really got going , why should Germany have faith that their gold is either actually present at the BOE and  NY Fed in the quantities alleged to be present or that good quality bars are present ? It would explain the refusals to allow Germany to inspect their own alleged gold though.... )


Exclusive: Bank Of England To The Fed: "No Indication Should, Of Course, Be Given To The Bundesbank..."

Tyler Durden's picture




Over the past several years, the German people, for a variety of justified reasons, have expressed a pressing desire to have their central bank perform a test, verification, validation or any other assay, of the official German gold inventory, which at 3,395 tonnes is the second highest in the world, second only to the US. We have italicized the word officialbecause this representation is merely on paper: the problem arises because no member of the general population, or even elected individuals, have been given access to observe this gold. The problem is exacerbated when one considers that a majority of the German gold is held offshore, primarily in the vaults of the New York Fed, and at the Bank of England - the two historic centers of central banking activity in the post World War 2 world.
Recently, the topic of German gold resurfaced following the disclosure that early on in the Eurozone creation process, the Bundesbank secretly withdrew two-thirds of its gold, or 940 tons, from London in 2000, leaving just 500 tons with the Bank of England. As we made it very clear, what was most odd about this event, is that the Bundesbank did something it had every right to do fully in the open: i.e., repatriate what belongs to it for any number of its own reasons - after all the German central bank is only accountable to its people (or so the myth goes), in deep secrecy. The question was why it opted for this stealthy transfer.
This immediately prompted rampant speculation within various media outlets, the most fanciful of which, of course, being that the Bundesbank never had any gold to begin with and has been masking the absence all along. The problem with such speculation is that, while it may be 100% correct and accurate, there has been not a shred of hard evidence to prove it.As a result, it is merely relegated to the echo chamber periphery of "serious media" whose inhabitants are already by and large convinced that all gold in the world is tungsten, lack of actual evidence to validate such a claim be damned (just like a chart of gold spiking or plunging is not evidence that a central bank signed the trade ticket, ordering said move), and in the process delegitimizing any fact-based investigations that attempt to debunk, using hard evidence, the traditional central banker narrative that the gold is there and accounted for.
And hard evidence, or better yet a paper trail of inconsistencies, is absolutely paramount when juxtaposing the two most powerful forces of our times: i) the central banking-led status quo (which isde facto the banker-led oligarchy whose primary purpose in the past several centuries has been to accumulate as much as possible of the hard asset-based fruits of people's labor, who toil in exchange for "money" created out of thin air - a process which could be described as not quite voluntary slavery, but the phrase would certainly suffice), and ii) "everyone else", especially when "everyone else" still believes in the supremacy of democratic forces, accountability, and an impartial legal system (three pillars of modern society which over the past 4 years we have experienced time and again have been nothing but mirages). Because without hard evidence, not only is the case of the people against central bankers non-existent, even if conducted in a kangaroo court co-opted by the banker-controlled status quo, it becomes laughable with every iteration of progressively more unsubstantiated accusations against the central banking cartels.
Finally, when it comes to cold, hard facts, which expose central banks in misdeed, even the great central banks have to be silent silent, as otherwise the overt perversion of justice will blow up the mirage that modern society lives in a democratic, laws-based world will be torn upside down.
And while others engage in click-baiting using grotesque hypotheses of grandure without any actual investigation, reporting or error and proof-checking to build up hype and speculation, which promptly fizzles and in the process desensitizes the general public and those actually undecided and/or on the fences about what truly goes on behind the scenes, Zero Hedge travelled (metaphorically) in space - to London, or specifically the Bankof England Archives - and in time, to May 1968 to be precise.
While there we dug up a certain memo,coded C43/323 in the BOE archives, official title "GOLD AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE OFFICE FILE: FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK (FRBNY) - MISCELLANEOUS", dated May 31, 1968, written by a certain Mr. Robeson addressed to the BOE's Roy Bridge as well as its Chief Cashier, and whose ultimate recipient is Charles Coombs who at the time was the manager of the open market account at the Fed, responsible for Fed operations in the gold and FX markets.
This memo, more than any of the other spurious and speculative accusation about Buba's golden hoard, should disturb German citizens, and of course the Bundesbank (assuming it was not already aware of its contents), as the memo lays out, without any shadow of doubt, that the BOE and the Fed, effectively conspired to feed the Bundesbank due gold bars that were of substantially subpar quality on at least one occasion in the period during the Bretton-Woods semi-gold standard (which ended with Nixon in August 1971).
The facts:  
At least two central banks have conspired on at least one occasion to provide the Bundesbank with what both banks knew was "bad delivery" gold -the convertible reserve currency under the Bretton Woods system, or in other words, to defraud - amounting to 172 barsThe "bad delivery" occured even as official gold refiners had warned that the quality of gold emanating from the US Assay Office was consistently below standard, and which both the BOE and the Fed were aware of. Instead of addressing the issue of declining gold quality and purity, the banks merely covered up the refiners' complaints 
It is this that the Bundesbank, the German government, and the German people should be focusing on. If in the process this means completely ridiculing the Buba's "she doth protest too much" defense strategy that what is happening in the media is a "phantom debate" as perAndreas Dobret's recent words, so be it. In fact, one may be well advised to ignore anything Buba has said on this matter, because in attempting to hyperbolize the matter out of irrelevancy, the Buba is now cornered and will have no choice now but to explain just what the true gold content of the gold even in its possession is, let alone that which is allocated to the Buba account 50 feet below sea level, underneath the infamous building on Liberty 33.
Full May 1968 memo from the BOE to the NY Fed: highlights ours:
MR. BRIDGE
THE CHIEF CASHIER

U.S. Assay Office Gold Bars

1.  We have from time to time had occasion to draw the Americans’ attention of thepoor standards of finish of U.S. Assay Office bars. In addition in 1961 we passed on to them comments from Johnson Matthey to the effect that spectrographic examination did not support the claimed assay on one bar they had so tested(although they would not by normal processes have challenged the assayand that impurities in the bar included iron which caused some material to be retained on the sides of crucible after pouring.
2. Recently, Johnson Matthey have put 172 “bad delivery” U.S. Assay Office bars into good delivery form for account of the Deutsche Bundesbank. These bars formed part of recent shipments by the Federal Reserve Bank to provide gold in London in repayment of swaps with the Bundesbank.The out-turn of the re-melting showed a loss in fine ounces terms four times greater than the gross weight loss. Asked to comment Johnson Matthey have indicated verbally that:-

(a) the mixing of “melt” bars of differing assays in one “pot” could produce a result which might be a contributing factor to a heavier loss in fine weight but they did not think this would be substantial ;


(b) a variation of .0001 in assay between different assayers is an extremely common phenomenon;



(c) over a long period of years they had had experience of unsatisfactory U.S. assays

3. It is not, however, possible to say that the U.S. assays were at fault because Johnson Matthey did not test any of the individual bars before putting them into the pot.

4. The Federal Reserve Bank have informed the Bundesbank that adjustments for differences in weight and refining charges will be reimbursed by the U.S.Treasury.
5. No indication should, of course, be given to the Bundesbank, or any other central bank holder of U.S. bars, as to the refiner’s views on them. The peculiarity of the out-turn will be known to the Bundesbank:it has so far occasioned no comment.

6. We should draw the attention of the Federal to the discrepancy in this (and any similar subsequent such) result and add simply that the refiners have made no formal comment but have indicate that, although very small differences in assay are not uncommon, their experience with U.S. Assay Office bars has not been satisfactory.

7. We hold 3,909 U.S. Assay Office bars for H.M.T. in London (in addition to the New York holding of 8,630 bars). After the London gold market was reopened in 1954 we test assayed the bars of certain assayers to ensure that pre-war standards were being maintained. It might be premature to set up arrangements now for sample test assays of U.S. Assay Office bars but if it appeared likely that the present discontent of the refiners might crystalise into formal complain we should certainly need to do this.  In the meantime I would recommend no further action.
31st May 1968

P.W.R.R.
To summarize: Bank of England discovers discrepancies with US Assay Office gold bars, notifies the NY Fed that its gold bars have major "bad delivery" issues, but, and this is the punchline, on this occasion, we'll keep it quiet, because the Bundesbank got these bars. This is merely one documented assay occasion: one can imagine that of the hundreds of thousands of gold bars in official circulation, the "good delivery" quality of bars outside of the US, and perhaps BOE, official holdings has progressively declined over the decades of Bretton Woods. One can also only imagine what has happened to all those "good delivery" bars currently held by the Fed as custodian at the NY Fed. Literally: imagine. Because there is no way to check what the real gold consistency of these gold bars is, and whether the refiners found ongoing future inconsistencies with "good delivery" standards of bars handed off to other "non-core" central banks. And, yes, without further evidence the above is merely speculation.
As to the remaining relevant facts: the US ran out of good delivery gold in March 1968 and only had coin bars remaining. Which is why it closed the gold pool and went to a two-tier price system. The Bundesbank went on to cover some of the outstanding gold debts of the Fed to the gold pool. Subsequently, the US then did several deals with the BOC to get a substantial amount of gold to pay back the Bundesbank which was sent over to England from March until June 1968. One can, again, only speculate on the quality of said gold. The Fed then created unsettled accounts to account for these transfers between itself and the Buba.
In light of the above facts and evidence, one can see why the Buba is doing all in its power to avoid the spotlight being shone on the purity of its gold inventory: after all the last thing the German central banks would want is someone to go through the publicly available archived literature, to put two and two together, and figure out that it does not take one massive "rehypothecation" (see "to Corzine") event for German gold credibility to be impaired: all it takes is death from a thousand micro dilutions over the decades to get the same end result. Because chipping away one ounce here, one ounce there for years and years and years,ultimately adds up to a lot.
We eagerly look forward to the Buba's next iteration of self-defense. We can only hope that this one does not include a reference to a "phantom debate", to "East German terrorist Simon Gruber" or toGoldfinger, as it will merely further destroy any remaining credibility the Bundesbank may have left in this, or any other, matter.
* * *
Look forward to more archive-based disclosure ot what may have happened to Buba's, and not only, gold in the coming days and weeks.

and no wonder the Germans want their gold - and the NY Fed keeps saying go away .... So what Germany just needs to do is demand delivery of their gold ....



http://www.silverdoctors.com/german-calls-for-gold-repatriation-intensify-as-fed-refuses-to-allow-inspection/

GERMAN CALLS FOR GOLD REPATRIATION INTENSIFY AS FED REFUSES TO ALLOW INSPECTION

Calls for Germany to repatriate its 1,536 tons of gold reserves held at the NY Fed are intensifying as Der Spiegel reports the Federal Reserve has refused to allow German inspectors to even view the country’s massive gold reserves “in the interest of security and of the control process“.
We have stated repeatedly that with repatriation and/or audit requests completed or in progress by Venezuela, Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands, The BOE and the Fed suddenly find themselves in a heap of trouble as the situation (and confidence that the Central banks actually still hold the tungsten gold reserves on deposit) is rapidly deteriorating. 

More on the Fed’s non-compliance with German requests to view/inspect their own gold below.



Der Spiegel reports that nearly half of Germany’s entire gold reserves are still held (supposedly) 5 floors below the NY Fed:

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York continues to hold 1,536 metric tons of German gold — or nearly half of Berlin’s reserves. This enormous hoard of gold is stored in the fifth subfloor of the bank’s building on Liberty Street, 25 meters (80 feet) below street level, and 15 meters below sea level. According to the bank’s website, the vault rests on the bedrock of Manhattan Island.
The Fed has reportedly denied German requests to view their own gold reserves, ‘in the interest of security’:
Tourists are allowed to venture below street level to see the vault. After descending in an elevator, they stand in front of an enormous steel cylinder that pivots like a door in a 140-ton steel-and-concrete frame. But not even the owners are allowed to view their own gold. According to the Federal Audit Office report,the Fed explained that “in the interest of security and of the control process” no “viewings” are possible.

Of the 9 compartments supposedly storing German gold, German officials were finally allowed to briefly view a few bars from a single compartment in 2011:

Finally, in 2007, “following numerous enquiries,” Bundesbank staff members were allowed to see the facility, but they reportedly only made it to the anteroom of the German reserves.
In fact, auditors from the Bundesbank made a second visit in May 2011. This time one of the nine compartments was also opened, in which the German gold bars are densely stacked. A few were pulled out and weighed. But this part of the report has been blacked out — out of consideration for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.


Unlike the US financial MSM, the German media is willing to discuss not only the question of whether the Federal Reserve has absconded with Germany’s gold, but also the risk of a collapse of a fully fiat currency:
The debate over a collapse of strictly paper-based currency is experiencing a renaissance — as is the dispute over the gold reserves. Even Green Party financial expert Gerhard Schick has joined the fray: “I think the question of how much gold is available in an emergency is a valid concern.”

Not surprisingly, Bundesbank officials are attempting to smooth over German concerns about their gold reserves, with board member Thiele snidely remarking that he took a look inside of one of the vaults at the NY Fed recently, and “There was no paper in there, just gold.“:

The Bundesbank also objects to this notion for another reason. It says the gold is supposed to act as an emergency buffer. In the extreme situation of a currency collapse, the bankers say that the gold bars could easily and quickly be exchanged on location for pounds or dollars to pay urgent bills.
In a bid to calm the debate, the Bundesbank has pledged to bring back and inspect 150 tons of gold from abroad over the next three years. Furthermore, there are plans to count and weigh the gold bars stored in one of the nine chambers at the Fed in New York — although no date has been set for this.
Bundesbank board member Thiele was also recently in New York where he took a look behind one of the vault doors. He had good news for the members of the parliamentary budget committee: “There was no paper in there, just gold.”


While Bundesbank officials likely understand the reality (much better than German politicians do) that a German repatriation of it’s entire 1,536 tons of gold reserves held at the NY Fed would likely cause a complete Western financial collapse if/when the Fed failed to promptly deliver said gold (tungsten free), confidence in the Fed and the BOE has clearly been shattered, and it is now only a matter of time for an absolute mad run on every last gram of physical metal underneath the NY Fed ensues.



and....




 http://www.silverdoctors.com/new-royal-canadian-mint-silver-etr-is-just-another-fractional-bullion-scam/

NEW ROYAL CANADIAN MINT SILVER ETR IS JUST ANOTHER FRACTIONAL BULLION SCAM!

The Royal Canadian Mint Silver ETR  is simply absurd. This security is a fractional bullion scam!
The new RCM paper form of silver has several embedded issues which can create the inability of the holder to actually receive the physical silver which they think they are investing in. At the end of the day, when you buy an RCM ETR thinking that you are investing in physical silver and thinking that you can take actual delivery if you want, the RCM has made it extremely burdensome to take actual delivery and can cancel your right to take delivery pretty much at its discretion. I don’t know about anyone else, but if I want to own physical bullion, I would not take the risks embedded in the Royal Canadian Mint ETR. It is nothing more than another version of the fractional ownership paper scam. Wash, rinse, repeat!

Submitted by Dave in Denver:

I just read through the prospectus for the new Royal Canadian Mint ETR, priced on Monday at $20 per unit. Each unit initially entitles the holder to a .619525 share of 1 oz. of silver bullion, to be safe-kept by the RCM. Notwithstanding the complicated formula required to calculate the share of bullion ratio on an ongoing basis for several reasons – the new RCM paper form of silver has several embedded issues which can create the inability of the holder to actually receive the physical gold ( editor question - silver ? )  which they think they are investing in.

The RCM does not directly link the prospectus on its website. In fact, it made it a pain the a** to track down and get a copy of it. My bet is that I’m one of the few people out there who has actually undertaken this task and read to the prospectus. I’ve linked it below.
To begin with, like all the other paper metal trusts (except the Sprott trusts – this write up does not apply to the Sprott trusts, let me make that clear), the RCM is the custodian of the bullion and states up front that the silver which is supposed to be for the trust will be held in an unallocated account. This may seem trivial right now, but if and when silver bullion becomes scarce and more people demand physical delivery of bullion that is being safe kept by the RCM, the RCM ETR has NO LEGAL STANDING FOR A SUPERIOR CLAIM on the bullion.
In other words, let the lawsuits begin and wait in line if there’s more claims on the silver in at the RCM vault than the RCM can produce. This is the number one and most egregious problem with all paper bullion trusts. Quite frankly, it would not cost any more money to create a separate, allocated storage section which legally specificies that all silver in that part of the vault belongs to the ETR trust. Why do they not do this? Because this security is a fractional bullion scam. Also, don’t forget that it was just a couple years ago that both the U.S. and Canadian mints had suspend production of bullion products because of a shortage.
Second, in order to make a redemption claim on the bullion, the holder much own a minimum of 5000 ETRs, or roughly $100,000 worth of ETRs. This is another hurdle that the promoters of these trusts build into them in order to avoid creating a 1:1 physical backing and in order to try and avoid the problem created by using an unallocated account for the mint. For most investors, $100,000 is too high of a commitment. In other words, the RCM is hoping that most ETR holders never redeem then and instead sell the ETRs in the market in exchange for paper dollar settlement. This issue is endemic to the paper bullion trust scam and the RCM is perpetuating and expanding the scam.
Third, the redemption process itself is quite burdensome. The person redeeming has to follow a mult-step redemption process perfectly, or the RCM can cancel the redemption. Besides the paper work involved, the redeemer ALSO has to provide for a Carrier to go to the RCM vault and pick up the silver. This includes the fact that the redeemer bears all the risk and expense of pick-up, transfer and delivery. While on the surface not unreasonable, typically the delivering party will take the responsibility of this step, including any insurance involved. The way this part of the ETR is structured tells me that the RCM was looking to erect yet another hurdle in order to discourage actual physical redemption and further reinforce the fractional scam that has been created.
Finally, just in case the holder seeking redemption successfully clears the above hurdles, the RCM has added a very broad clause giving it the power to suspend or cancel the redemption. This provision is directly from the prospectus: The Mint may suspend the right of an ETR Holder to redeem its ETRs or postpone the date of delivery or payment of the redemption proceeds (whether physical silver bullion and/or cash, as the case may be) for any period during which the Mint determines that conditions exist which render impractical the fabrication, evaluation or sale of silver or which impair the ability of the Mint to determine the value of the silver bullion owned by the ETR Holder or the redemption amount for the ETRs. Any declaration of suspension made by the Mint shall be conclusive.

I don’t think I need to restate the obvious there. At the end of the day, when you buy an RCM ETR thinking that you are investing in physical silver and thinking that you can take actual delivery if you want, the RCM has made it extremely burdensome to take actual delivery and can cancel your right to take delivery pretty much at its discretion. I don’t know about anyone else, but if I want to own physical bullion, I would not take the risks embedded in the Royal Canadian Mint ETR. It is nothing more than another version of the fractional ownership paper scam. Wash, rinse, repeat.



And who makes the world go round ? JP Morgan and GS of course - as the Regulators bow down once again....


FED DELAYS BASEL III RULES INDEFINITELY



The Fed issued a statement Friday morning that they are delaying the implementation of the Basel III capital rules which were to go into effect January 1st. 
Apparently JPM and Goldman whined that they were not ready for the implementation of the new rules, so they have been postponed indefinitely.  Is anyone surprised?
Full Federal Reserve statement below:
U.S. regulators on Friday delayed the effective date of a global agreement on greater bank capital buffers reached in response to the financial crisis of 2008.
The rule delay could help big banks such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group who must ultimately comply with the rules, as well as smaller banks who also will have to meet the requirements.

The Fed gave no timetable for the implementation:

Specifically, the Federal Reserve and two other bank regulators introduced a proposal in June to implement the global agreement known as Basel III that suggested an effective date for institutions to comply of Jan. 1.
However, the U.S. regulators agreed Friday that “due to the wide range of views” expressed by interested institutions and others that a delay was necessary.
They did not provide a substitute effective date for the rules, arguing that they are “working as expeditiously as possible to complete” them.

Apparently gold will have to take out the $2,000 level on it’s own bullish fundamentals without assistance from tier 1 asset status, which it will no doubt do quite easily and successfully.

Click here for full report from MarketWatch:
The Fed’s full press release:

AGENCIES PROVIDE GUIDANCE ON REGULATORY CAPITAL RULEMAKINGS


The U.S. federal banking agencies issued three notices of proposed rulemaking in June that would revise and replace the current regulatory capital rules. The proposals suggested an effective date of January 1, 2013. Many industry participants have expressed concern that they may be subject to a final regulatory capital rule on January 1, 2013, without sufficient time to understand the rule or to make necessary systems changes.
In light of the volume of comments received and the wide range of views expressed during the comment period, the agencies do not expect that any of the proposed rules would become effective on January 1, 2013. As members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the U.S. agencies take seriously our internationally agreed timing commitments regarding the implementation of Basel III and are working as expeditiously as possible to complete the rulemaking process. As with any rule, the agencies will take operational and other considerations into account when determining appropriate implementation dates and associated transition periods.











http://harveyorgan.blogspot.com/2012/11/dexia-needs-new-bailoutgold-and-silver.html


THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2012


Dexia needs a new bailout/gold and silver have second day of an outside day reversal/Greek unemployment rises again/B. and England stops QE

Good evening Ladies and Gentlemen:

Gold closed up again to the tune of $12.20 or 1725.40. Silver also rose by 58 cents closing the comex session at $32.23.  Gold and silver trading has been unusual during the past two sessions as the banker raids have been repelled with such force and then on both days, our two precious metals closed at their highs. This is great for us and a bad omen for our bankers who are losing control of the paper game. Thus we have had two outside day reversals in a row and  both to the upside.  The bankers never like to see an outside day reversal and always attack on the second day. This is also the second day in a row that gold/silver rose and the Dow plummeted on both days.


In the access market late tonight:

gold:  $1731.90
silver: $32.31
In early morning news from Europe we were told that Greece saw their unemployment rise again to over 25.4% with youth capable of working having an unemployment rate of 58%.  England surprised us all today by announcing that they were suspending their QE because in their words they saw no noticeable effect.  QE is nothing but a detriment.  Late in the day, Dexia announced a further bailout which will put further pressure on France and Belgium. Spanish bonds retreated in price (rose in yield) as investors start to worry that Spain will not ask for a bailout this year. Japan continues to collapse as it's current account surplus shrinks as did its factory machine orders.

In the USA, initial claims fell in the USA and this was coupled with a better trade figures. The Dow plummeted anyway despite this good news.


We will go over all of these stories but first...........................


Let us now head over to the comex and assess today's trading.

The total comex gold OI rose by 3,239 contracts as newbie longs piled into the metal.  The print tonight on the total gold comex rests at 450,393.  Last night's OI stood at 447,154.  The non active November gold contract month saw it's OI fall by 15 contracts from 44 down to 29.  We had 25 delivery notices yesterday so in essence we gained 10 contracts or an additional 1,000 oz of gold will stand for delivery in November.
The big December contract is now 3 weeks away as it's OI rests tonight at 269,950 a fall of 8,933 contracts from yesterday's print of 278,883.  The players who left December rolled in February.  The estimated volume today at the gold comex came in at a very light 146,212. The volume yesterday was quite large at 306,313.  It seems that everybody wanted to jump on the bandwagon in gold yesterday.The total silver comex OI refused to follow in gold's footsteps.  It's total  OI fell by 1497 contracts from 139,313 down to 137,816 as the bankers got nervous and covered their shortfall.  The bankers are becoming quite nervous as they pour over the data for silver.  The non active November silver month saw it's OI rise from 23 to 27 for a gain of 4 contracts.  We had 3 delivery notices filed yesterday so again we gained 7 additional silver contracts or 35,000 oz of additional silver will stand in November.  The big December silver contract month saw it's OI fall by 3686 contracts from 69,758 down to 66,072.  Some rolled, while others like  the bankers covered their shorts.  We probably had some newbie longs take some profits off the table in silver.  The estimated volume at the silver comex came in at a very respectable 48,611.  The confirmed volume yesterday was humongous at 78,285.




Comex gold figures 

Nov 8-.2012   

Today, we again had tiny activity inside the gold vaults.



The dealer had no deposits and no withdrawals. 

The customer had one  deposit and no withdrawals:




Customer deposit:

i) Into Scotia 1478.90 oz



Adjustments: none


Thus the dealer inventory rests tonight at 2.587 million oz (80.466) tonnes of gold.



The CME reported that we had   4 notices  filed  or 400 oz of gold. The total number of notices filed so far this month is thus 291 notices or 29,100 oz of gold.
To determine what is left to be served upon, I take the OI standing for November (29) and subtract out today's notices (4) which leaves us with 25 notices or 2,500 oz left to be served upon our longs.

Thus the total number of gold ounces standing for delivery in November is as follows:

29,100 oz (served)  +  2,500 oz (to be served upon)  =  31,600 oz (.9828 tonnes of gold).  we gained 1000 oz of additional gold standing for November.




Silver:

Nov 8.2012:



Today, we had some activity inside the silver vaults.
 we had no dealer deposit and no dealer withdrawal.



The customer  had no  deposits today:



we had the following customer withdrawals:

i) Out of Scotia:  309,750.3 oz




total customer withdrawal:  309,750.30 oz



we had 2 adjustments:

Out of the CNT vault:

62,047.000 oz was withdrawn from the customer account at CNT and re enter the dealer at CNTii)  Out of the Delaware vault


83,873.357 oz of silver was withdrawn from the customer and re enter the dealer at Delaware. 






Registered silver remains this weekend  at :  36.408 million oz
total of all silver:  142.625 million oz.




The CME reported that we had 10 notices filed for 50,000 oz . The total number of silver notices filed  this month is thus 36 contracts or 180,000 oz of silver.  



To determine the number of silver ounces standing for November, I take the OI standing for November (27) and subtract out today's notices (10) which leaves us with 17 notices or 85,000 oz ready to be served upon.

Thus the total number of silver ounces standing in this non active month of November is as follows:

180,000 oz (served) +  85,000 oz ( to be served upon)  =  265,000 oz
we  gained 35,000 oz of additional  silver ounces standing in the November delivery month.

*   *   * 


Obama Victory: Increased Gold And Silver Storage In Zurich And Asian Capitals





*   *   * 


Gold rose for a third day yesterday after confirmation that President Barack Obama won re- election, while stock markets fell sharply and treasuries headed for the biggest advance in 11 weeks.

Robust investment demand continues and may intensify after the election and exchange traded products backed by gold attracted $2.5 billion of inflows in October alone.

Total inflows in commodities ETPs were $3.1 billion last month, taking assets under management to $201.6 billion for Blackrock Inc alone according to Bloomberg.

Many analysts believe that President Obama’s re-election is the “best- case” scenario for precious metals due to implications for monetary and fiscal policy. Obama faces chronic high unemployment, weak economic growth and the upcoming fiscal cliff, not too mention very difficult geopolitical challenges in the form of Israel, Iran, Russia and China.Today, The European Central Bank has its rate decision at 1245 GMT and they are expected to leave rates unchanged.
Investors are now again focussing on the US fiscal cliff which will enact $600 billion in tax hikes and severe budget cuts, if no action is taken by the US Congress, than the US will fall deeper into its recession.

*   *   * 


Gold bullion is not only supported by the uncertainty of the “fiscal cliff” but the Eurozone debt crisis is set to deepen again.

There remains the real risk of an exit from the single currency by one or more members and of course the risk of a global recession and Depression which will be responded to by more loose monetary policies by various central governments.

More of the world's rich are moving their gold, silver and other valuables away from the economic turmoil in the West to the Asian capitals of Singapore and Hong Kong according to Reuters (see commentary).

This is prompting vaulting and storage specialists in the increasingly prosperous region to increase their capacity by creating extra vaulting space.

Depositories in Asia report that there are a lot of enquiries from European banks, not because the banks themselves necessarily want to move the assets to Asia, but because their clients are asking them to.

These clients include rich Asians who want their valuables closer to home as well as Westerners.
Singapore and Hong Kong are two of the favoured destinations. Both have seen a significant increase in gold importations in 2012.
With Chinese demand for gold and silver surging depositories are looking to cater to the huge growing swathe of wealthy Chinese and this is leading to increasing vaulting services being offered in Singapore, Hong Kong and now even Shanghai.
China is on its way to overtake India as the world's biggest gold consumer this year, as India's gold demand has taken a blow on record rupee prices and higher import tax while Chinese consumers' appetite for gold remains resilient.

We have firsthand experience of this increasing preference for 
secure bullion storage  as we have seen an increased preference for storage in Zurich and Hong Kong.

Zurich remains the preferred destination for most western investors and of investors internationally but we and other bullion providers are seeing some western clients opt for secure storage in Asia.

There is a definite sense amongst some of our American and European clients that storing gold in Zurich and Asia is safer than in London, New York, Delaware or elsewhere in U.S. and this trend is set to continue.

Throughout history capital has flowed to where it is most favourably treated and today there is a definite move to own capital and assets outside of massively indebted and near insolvent western democracies.

Obama’s second term is likely to see Ben Bernanke continue to devalue and debase the dollar which will lead to increased investment demand and store of wealth demand for gold and to investors seeking storage in Zurich, Singapore and Hong Kong.










http://www.silverdoctors.com/max-keiser-with-ned-naylor-leyland-on-germanys-gold-jp-morgans-shorts-and-bart-chiltons-investigation/#more-16948


MAX KEISER WITH NED NAYLOR-LEYLAND ON GERMANY’S GOLD, JP MORGAN’S SHORTS AND BART CHILTON’S ‘INVESTIGATION’

In the latest Keiser Report, Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert discuss Goldfinger at the New York Fed in Lower Manhattan where Germany’s gold did not dissolve in the Hurricane Sandy floods, but $13 trillion in paper assets did. They also discuss Treasury secretaries and Goldman CEOs as the stuff of nightmares. In the second half, Max Keiser talks to our good friend Ned Naylor-Leyland about Germany’s gold, JP Morgan’s shorts and Bart Chilton’s ‘investigation.’


and.......



GERMAN CALLS FOR GOLD REPATRIATION INTENSIFY AS FED REFUSES TO ALLOW INSPECTION




Calls for Germany to repatriate its 1,536 tons of gold reserves held at the NY Fed are intensifying as Der Spiegel reports the Federal Reserve has refused to allow German inspectors to even view the country’s massive gold reserves “in the interest of security and of the control process“.
We have stated repeatedly that with repatriation and/or audit requests completed or in progress by Venezuela, Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands, The BOE and the Fed suddenly find themselves in a heap of trouble as the situation (and confidence that the Central banks actually still hold the tungsten gold reserves on deposit) is rapidly deteriorating. More on the Fed’s non-compliance with German requests to view/inspect their own gold below.



Der Spiegel reports that nearly half of Germany’s entire gold reserves are still held (supposedly) 5 floors below the NY Fed:

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York continues to hold 1,536 metric tons of German gold — or nearly half of Berlin’s reserves. This enormous hoard of gold is stored in the fifth subfloor of the bank’s building on Liberty Street, 25 meters (80 feet) below street level, and 15 meters below sea level. According to the bank’s website, the vault rests on the bedrock of Manhattan Island.

The Fed has reportedly denied German requests to view their own gold reserves, ‘in the interest of security’:

Tourists are allowed to venture below street level to see the vault. After descending in an elevator, they stand in front of an enormous steel cylinder that pivots like a door in a 140-ton steel-and-concrete frame. But not even the owners are allowed to view their own gold. According to the Federal Audit Office report,the Fed explained that “in the interest of security and of the control process” no “viewings” are possible.


Of the 9 compartments supposedly storing German gold, German officials were finally allowed to briefly view a few bars from a single compartment in 2011:

Finally, in 2007, “following numerous enquiries,” Bundesbank staff members were allowed to see the facility, but they reportedly only made it to the anteroom of the German reserves.
In fact, auditors from the Bundesbank made a second visit in May 2011. This time one of the nine compartments was also opened, in which the German gold bars are densely stacked. A few were pulled out and weighed. But this part of the report has been blacked out — out of consideration for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.



Unlike the US financial MSM, the German media is willing to discuss not only the question of whether the Federal Reserve has absconded with Germany’s gold, but also the risk of a collapse of a fully fiat currency:

The debate over a collapse of strictly paper-based currency is experiencing a renaissance — as is the dispute over the gold reserves. Even Green Party financial expert Gerhard Schick has joined the fray: “I think the question of how much gold is available in an emergency is a valid concern.”


Not surprisingly, Bundesbank officials are attempting to smooth over German concerns about their gold reserves, with board member Thiele snidely remarking that he took a look inside of one of the vaults at the NY Fed recently, and “There was no paper in there, just gold.“:

The Bundesbank also objects to this notion for another reason. It says the gold is supposed to act as an emergency buffer. In the extreme situation of a currency collapse, the bankers say that the gold bars could easily and quickly be exchanged on location for pounds or dollars to pay urgent bills.
In a bid to calm the debate, the Bundesbank has pledged to bring back and inspect 150 tons of gold from abroad over the next three years. Furthermore, there are plans to count and weigh the gold bars stored in one of the nine chambers at the Fed in New York — although no date has been set for this.
Bundesbank board member Thiele was also recently in New York where he took a look behind one of the vault doors. He had good news for the members of the parliamentary budget committee: “There was no paper in there, just gold.”



While Bundesbank officials likely understand the reality (much better than German politicians do) that a German repatriation of it’s entire 1,536 tons of gold reserves held at the NY Fed would likely cause a complete Western financial collapse if/when the Fed failed to promptly deliver said gold (tungsten free), confidence in the Fed and the BOE has clearly been shattered, and it is now only a matter of time for an absolute mad run on every last gram of physical metal underneath the NY Fed ensues.




and......




http://www.caseyresearch.com/gsd/edition/john-hathaway-gold-set-super-surge-new-all-time-highs


John Hathaway: Gold Set to Super-Surge to New All-Time Highs

Nov
8

No comments:

Post a Comment