The ECB's press conference Thursday was declared a snooze by some who felt there was nothing new – and just plain frustrating for others who felt it introduced more new questions than it answered.
There was one exchange in the Q&A that deserves attention, though, because it reveals quite a bit about the thinking of the European leaders who are driving this crisis right now.
The exchange was between CNBC's veteran ECB watcher, Silvia Wadhwa, and ECB president Mario Draghi.
Wadhwa has been writing about how the notion of conditionality – the requirement that euro area member states must submit to austerity policies designed by supranational agencies before receiving ECB aid – seems to go way outside the mandate of the ECB.
Here is part of her response to the ECB's historic OMT bond-buying plan revealed in August – which features conditionality as its hallmark – and the apparent contradiction it poses:
It's really that simple: either bond purchases of euro countries where yields are blowing up in a fashion that threaten the functioning of the markets are within the ECB mandate. Then the ECB should embark upon them whenever it sees fit. Or they are not within the mandate; then it should jolly well stay away from them, because it would be illegal. Period. End of argument.
But to say "we are acting within our mandate"; but we shall only do so, if you (the country in question) deliver on certain political conditions; then — I am sorry — the ECB is taking on a role it was never designed for and that is certainly outside its mandate. The ECB was designed for supporting "the general economic policies in the Community with a view to contributing to the achievement of the objectives of the Community" (in as far as it doesn't infringe upon the primary mandate of safeguarding price stability). Supporting policy, not setting conditions for it or setting an agenda for which economic of financial policies a given country embarks upon.