Saturday, September 1, 2012

Highlighting three recent pieces from Dave from Denver .... first , while Europe gets the headlines , the debt situation in the US is notably worse ( fiscal cliff upcoming after the election and 16 trillion in debt on the one hand that will be increased to another few trillion , interminal borrowing to de facto and constantly keep the banksters and our government afloat on the otherhand ) . Second , Dave' s modest proposal as we hit the current national debt ceiling ( which oh so conveniently ignores the FNM / FRE de facto government obligations which would tack on another 6 - 10 trillion to the national debt if this was required to be officially carried as government debt - government ponzi is okay just don't try that at home ) , the 4 trillion in debt carried by the 50 States and legacy liabilities such as SS / medicare / underfunded federal pensions ----- start with the political leeches giving up their salaries ( they're already millionaires and have the legal ability to make killings on legal insider trading based on laws they pass or government actions they have knowledge of beforehand ... consider giving up their "formal " salary akin to a symbolic contribution back to the society they've screwed over collectively......Third , Dave's take on Friday's metal moves - only question on the Bernank is whether he moves before or after the election with QE 3 ..... i think Bernank will watch the poll numbers as closely as Romney and Obama , unless he gets the cover of some type of " October Surprise " ! ...

http://soberlook.com/2012/08/monetary-expansion-dollar-and-commodity.html

( On further review , Dave may be right on the Fed holding off on actually enacting QE 3 until after the election - if they move in September , commodity prices will spike again.... )


FRIDAY, AUGUST 31, 2012

Monetary expansion, the dollar, and commodity prices

Economists continue to insist that there is no connection between Fed's monetary expansion and increases in commodity prices, particularly agricultural products globally (discussed here). Here is a typical comment:
If it is commonly believed that the FOMC can cause a worldwide food shortage then we are truly in a dark age of macro. The FOMC has no ability to raise the price of commodities relative to national income, and I can't even imagine the rationale that monetary expansion could somehow increased prices internationally (that is, denominated in foreign currencies). The only way they could raise food prices in real terms is if they could spur increased food consumption domestically, which would be much more likely if they strengthened the dollar than if they weakened it. The FOMC can cause a lot of trouble, but this is just not on the list of problems they can cause, and certainly not via monetary expansion.
Unfortunately macroeconomic theory here diverges from market experience. Monetary expansion in the recent past corresponded with significant dollar weakness. The chart below shows the dollar weakening during both QE1 and QE2. "Twist" on the other hand did not involve monetary expansion and only focused on reducing the average duration of treasuries.


Source: BNP Paribas

Dollar weakness to any commodity trader is a signal to buy - which is not necessarily linked to demand fundamentals. Those who don't believe this should only take a look at the following chart comparing the dollar (DXY) with the CRB commodity index.


Source: Bloomberg
What's important to point out here is that the commodity price movements have been much larger than the dollar movements. In fact on a percentage basis the CRB range in the graph above is almost double the dollar range. That means even for currencies that are not in any way tied to the dollar (although a number of emerging market currencies are), when the dollar weakens, commodity prices move higher even if denominated in these other currencies. Commodity price increases due to dollar weakness therefore propagate globally even in nations whose currencies are not linked to the dollar. This empirical relationship drives global commodity markets even if supply/demand fundamentals don't warrant such adjustments. But when one faces tight and uncertain supply conditions to begin with (as we have now for agricultural commodities), dollar weakness will force an even larger commodities swings to the upside.In 2011 the CIA was chastised for not being able to see the Arab Spring coming. Where did all that pro-democracy fervor come from all of a sudden? Why wasn't the CIA able to see key signs of the movement earlier? The answer has less to do with zeal for democracy and more to do with not being able to buy food. As food prices spiked across the Arab world, so did the protests.

Source: Bloomberg

Certainly in the long run macroeconomic fundamentals should play out. But we don't live in "the long run". Global markets take seconds to reprice, usually far overshooting/distorting the "fundamentals". And, as the Arab Spring showed, people don't wait for these fundamentals to settle to their expected levels.






and here's Dave .......








FRIDAY, AUGUST 31, 2012


The Action In The Metals Today

If you read between the lines of Bernanke's headline comments, he essentially is saying that he's ready to print a lot of money if "necessary."  That's why the metals where ambushed hard yesterday, it's why the dollar dropped like a rock on no other news overnight, it's why they took the metals down as the headlines hit and it's why the metals spiked hard after the initial hit today.  We actually removed all hedges from our fund yesterday after the ambush because I suspected this would be the case.
This is highly orchestrated at this point and frighteningly Orwellian.  The metals are getting ready for a big move higher and all of the short-term trading geeks/computer funds using rsi's and macd's are going to get hammered on shorts or miss out on a very big run if they are flat.

Bernanke's speech was exactly what I thought it would be in terms of FOMC policy promotion:  basically a regurgitation of the last FOMC meeting statement.  You don't need to dissect his statements word for word the way that bald idiot on CNBC (Steve Liesman) likes to do.  If you look at what he says contextually, it's easy to see that he's ready to drop a massive printed money into the system once the election is over.  I don't think its coincidental that the Treasury debt ceiling will be hit about a month AFTER the election.  Remember:  the purposes of money printing are 1)  to keep the banks solvent/liquid and 2) to finance Treasury debt.  Per the latter, we know that during one trailing 12 month period after QE2 was announced, the Fed indirectly bought 90% of all new Treasury debt issued.  For all of 2011, the Fed bought something like 60% of all Treasury debt issued.

That's why I can't understand why newsletter "experts" like  The King Report and Phoenix Capital, the latter featured on Zerohedge, are so adamant about their view that there will not be any more QE.  If that's the case, how will the Government fund its operations?  It's really that simple.  It's not about the economy, stupid.

The bottom line is that today's move in the metals took a lot of people by surprise.  In addition, the open interest in silver has declined quite a bit this week in what is likely aggressive short-covering by JP Morgan.  In other words, something is going on behind "the curtain" which we are not seeing that has triggered short covering by "insiders" to the market.  Next week should be interesting, to say the least.

I hope everyone has fun holiday weekend.  The tennis U.S. Open will be in full swing this weekend - hopefully Andy Roddick lasts a few more rounds before he retires and college football kicks into full gear, as does the Friday night lights of high school football.

No comments:

Post a Comment